Winning against stronger teams but losing to weaker teams
or
Losing to stronger teams but winning against weaker teams
Winning against stronger teams but losing to weaker teams
or
Losing to stronger teams but winning against weaker teams
sm1th0o [#2]doesn't matter if you can't win the tournament at the end
doesn't matter if you can't qualify for the tournament at the end
unknown_trash [#4]winning to stronger and losing to weaker teams
then you just look like a fluke, neither option is really good as the other option just means ur a mid team
ntro [#5]then you just look like a fluke, neither option is really good as the other option just means ur a mid team
ok TL fan, mid is mid either way. i want a mid team that can be a dark horse than a mid team capped comfortably at mid.
sm1th0o [#2]doesn't matter if you can't win the tournament at the end
off topic but moving on
depends on region if you play in a goated one like china /j
you will get to play offs then to a tourney and will only lose to frauds ( like nrg or l0lquid )
unknown_trash [#6]ok TL fan, mid is mid either way. i want a mid team that can be a dark horse than a mid team capped comfortably at mid.
had to bring up the flair when you dont even have one classic vlr user. if you are a team who wins against strong teams but cant win any weak teams it literally means u are a fluke and you are below mid because u can't beat a shit team. if you beat the shit teams at least u can be called mid
K4ziuHa [#8]depends on region if you play in a goated one like china /j
you will get to play offs then to a tourney and will only lose to frauds ( like nrg or l0lquid )
have no connection to playoffs... just straight which is better to have/be
Pengu12 [#10]Is it like close losses or just demolitions?
both wins and losses are demolitions, you win with large margin, you lose with large margin
TheLoque [#11]have no connection to playoffs... just straight which is better to have/be
I guess winning to goated teams losing to flukes