SEN 2-0 SHARKS
May 28, 2021
1:25 PM EDT
Patch 2.09
TL ban Icebox; VKS ban Split; VKS pick Ascent; TL pick Haven; Bind remains
Streams
Maps/Stats
8
Team Vikings
4 /
4
Ascent
PICK
46:47
Team Liquid
8 /
5
13
VKS 
TL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
All
Attack
Defend
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.21 0.99 1.50 | 238 181 315 | 17 7 10 | / 14 9 5 / | 4 2 2 | +3 -2 +5 | 81% 67% 100% | 148 130 171 | 16% 13% 20% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.87 0.79 0.97 | 196 155 251 | 15 7 8 | / 16 10 6 / | 4 2 2 | -1 -3 +2 | 57% 50% 67% | 127 105 156 | 21% 27% 17% | 3 0 3 | 1 0 1 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.87 1.08 0.58 | 156 148 168 | 10 6 4 | / 14 8 6 / | 3 1 2 | -4 -2 -2 | 71% 67% 78% | 106 111 99 | 23% 31% 14% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.68 0.37 1.09 | 126 71 200 | 8 2 6 | / 15 10 5 / | 7 4 3 | -7 -8 +1 | 81% 75% 89% | 87 47 140 | 21% 25% 19% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.58 0.40 0.81 | 136 119 158 | 9 4 5 | / 17 11 6 / | 3 3 0 | -8 -7 -1 | 48% 42% 56% | 96 95 98 | 17% 14% 20% | 6 4 2 | 6 6 0 | 0 -2 +2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.49 1.28 1.64 | 306 279 328 | 24 9 15 | / 11 6 5 / | 3 1 2 | +13 +3 +10 | 76% 56% 92% | 166 146 181 | 20% 23% 19% | 6 2 4 | 6 4 2 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
1.34 1.04 1.56 | 195 206 187 | 17 7 10 | / 10 7 3 / | 5 2 3 | +7 0 +7 | 86% 78% 92% | 105 82 123 | 30% 29% 31% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.01 0.58 1.33 | 203 99 281 | 14 3 11 | / 15 8 7 / | 10 4 6 | -1 -5 +4 | 71% 67% 75% | 156 86 208 | 30% 42% 26% | 2 0 2 | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | |
|
|
0.93 1.17 0.75 | 152 236 90 | 10 6 4 | / 12 7 5 / | 5 4 1 | -2 -1 -1 | 71% 56% 83% | 103 139 75 | 17% 16% 17% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
|
0.88 0.75 0.98 | 146 73 202 | 11 3 8 | / 11 5 6 / | 5 3 2 | 0 -2 +2 | 81% 89% 75% | 95 48 131 | 17% 8% 22% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 |
All
Attack
Defend
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.13 0.61 0.93 | 198 200 189 | 24 16 8 | / 29 17 12 / | 7 4 3 | -5 -1 -4 | 72% 75% 67% | 127 140 107 | 27% 35% 15% | 2 1 1 | 5 1 4 | -3 0 -3 | |
|
0.77 1.15 0.91 | 190 156 256 | 26 13 13 | / 30 19 11 / | 6 2 4 | -4 -6 +2 | 67% 58% 80% | 116 103 138 | 19% 18% 20% | 2 0 2 | 3 2 1 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
|
0.73 0.59 0.66 | 152 151 162 | 21 13 8 | / 32 20 12 / | 8 4 4 | -11 -7 -4 | 46% 46% 47% | 98 94 105 | 25% 34% 15% | 4 1 3 | 5 3 2 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
|
0.51 0.90 0.66 | 150 120 192 | 19 9 10 | / 31 22 9 / | 11 7 4 | -12 -13 +1 | 74% 71% 80% | 93 73 125 | 19% 18% 20% | 2 2 0 | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
|
0.64 0.51 0.59 | 139 152 118 | 17 11 6 | / 33 21 12 / | 5 4 1 | -16 -10 -6 | 54% 58% 47% | 98 112 76 | 20% 19% 22% | 7 5 2 | 7 7 0 | 0 -2 +2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.43 1.67 1.58 | 289 267 306 | 41 14 27 | / 18 8 10 / | 10 4 6 | +23 +6 +17 | 85% 73% 92% | 171 155 180 | 22% 20% 23% | 12 4 8 | 7 4 3 | +5 0 +5 | |
|
0.73 1.64 1.29 | 220 145 265 | 33 9 24 | / 20 10 10 / | 10 3 7 | +13 -1 +14 | 82% 73% 88% | 124 61 164 | 38% 33% 39% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
|
1.27 1.18 1.21 | 267 260 263 | 37 15 22 | / 24 12 12 / | 18 6 12 | +13 +3 +10 | 79% 80% 79% | 158 130 175 | 28% 43% 22% | 3 1 2 | 2 0 2 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.84 0.97 0.92 | 186 146 207 | 26 10 16 | / 23 9 14 / | 12 5 7 | +3 +1 +2 | 85% 93% 79% | 102 75 118 | 18% 22% 16% | 5 1 4 | 4 2 2 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
1.30 0.61 0.87 | 138 218 91 | 18 12 6 | / 22 8 14 / | 13 5 8 | -4 +4 -8 | 77% 67% 83% | 92 125 71 | 19% 24% 14% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 |
5
Team Vikings
5 /
0
Haven
PICK
41:03
Team Liquid
7 /
6
13
VKS
TL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
All
Attack
Defend
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.00 1.17 0.65 | 240 251 220 | 14 10 4 | / 15 9 6 / | 4 3 1 | -1 +1 -2 | 72% 83% 50% | 152 169 119 | 30% 38% 15% | 2 1 1 | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
|
0.64 0.65 0.61 | 173 170 180 | 11 7 4 | / 16 12 4 / | 4 3 1 | -5 -5 0 | 67% 67% 67% | 101 100 103 | 17% 16% 21% | 1 1 0 | 2 2 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
|
0.60 0.88 0.05 | 142 184 58 | 8 7 1 | / 16 10 6 / | 2 1 1 | -8 -3 -5 | 61% 75% 33% | 100 129 43 | 24% 23% 33% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
|
0.57 0.54 0.62 | 142 130 168 | 9 6 3 | / 16 10 6 / | 2 0 2 | -7 -4 -3 | 50% 50% 50% | 80 76 87 | 29% 36% 20% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
|
0.42 0.66 0.02 | 107 147 28 | 6 6 0 | / 16 10 6 / | 4 2 2 | -10 -4 -6 | 33% 42% 17% | 65 84 28 | 35% 42% 0% | 1 1 0 | 4 3 1 | -3 -2 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.69 1.66 1.70 | 272 248 285 | 17 5 12 | / 7 2 5 / | 7 3 4 | +10 +3 +7 | 94% 100% 92% | 176 169 180 | 25% 15% 30% | 6 2 4 | 1 0 1 | +5 +2 +3 | |
|
|
1.45 2.31 1.02 | 330 503 244 | 23 12 11 | / 9 4 5 / | 8 2 6 | +14 +8 +6 | 89% 100% 83% | 159 196 141 | 27% 44% 16% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
|
1.23 0.26 1.72 | 245 53 342 | 16 2 14 | / 10 3 7 / | 5 1 4 | +6 -1 +7 | 78% 67% 83% | 146 29 205 | 48% 100% 47% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
|
0.96 0.97 0.96 | 226 255 213 | 15 7 8 | / 12 4 8 / | 7 2 5 | +3 +3 0 | 89% 100% 83% | 109 115 106 | 18% 36% 12% | 5 1 4 | 1 0 1 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
|
0.80 1.49 0.46 | 124 191 91 | 8 6 2 | / 10 1 9 / | 8 1 7 | -2 +5 -7 | 83% 83% 83% | 79 104 66 | 24% 50% 11% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 |
Head-to-head
Past Matches
Damn I laughed hard when I read that message, ever more when I saw who posted (srs)
Assuming VKS meet Liquid here, think it'll be a tight one. 2-1 Liquid, please don't bottle it again.
Do not see Vikings taking this against Liquid. Could def be a map 3 though
Vks 2-0 liquid. Even if vks plays badly they 2-1 liquid. Liquid has to step it up wayy more if they want to move past vks. Saadhak supremacy
Liquid 2-0
Liquid is suspect rn but Vikings look like absolute dogshit. 2020 comps and gtn just doesnt cut it as a duelist at this level
TL 2-0 VKS
It seems like a meme but VKS being a super top team does not want to adapt to the goal and that cost them everything I hope they work more for the Berlin masters
Liquid 2-0 ez, brazilian teams sticking to the same comps that are making them get 2-0'd, watch them neglect viper sage (icebox) and astra again
spoiler: they wont. too much ego not enough gameplay to back it up
probably liquid 2-0 VKS, theres a chance that theres a third map, but i cannot see them beating liquid, this isnt the same liquid that we saw beating fpx but whatever VKS has no chance at all lmao
Underperforming liquid vs underperforming vks. I expected a lot more from both of these teams and I'm still hoping we see a good match. idk about picks here tho. Vks bans split and tl bans icebox. Both generally pick ascent so maybe tl ascent and vks haven with bind left over? Feel free to enlighten me. This game really depends on whos mind is in the game more. Thoughts?
That's a 100% sober comment lol Pretty on point. In the end it will come down to how much impact does ScreaM brings as well as how gtn and frz perform... I don't see Liquid as a team like Sentinels that is going to completely impose its strats and rhythm on VKS , unless ScreaM just go mad in both maps (which he hasn't done yet).
I feel like the duelist duo in VKS are falling short and that is what is difficulting the execution of strats by VKS.
can you imagine scream losing a single trade to gtn or frz? kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
gtn with sunglasses + brazilian flag = biggest joke ever, 150 ACS duelist kkkkkkkkkkkk
A semana inteira
Fiquei esperando
Pra te ver SACY
Pra te ver ultando
Quando a gente luta
Não pensa em dinheiro
Só te ver sovar, te ver sovar, te ver sovar
#goVKS #goVikings
Im biased for liquid but at the same time vikings hasnt showed anything too impressive yet. Will be interesting matches for sure. 2-1 for TL overall.
It would be cool to see if TL's comps can stand a chance against a team like SEN. They underperformed against V1, but against a team like SEN they could lose even if they are playing their A game.
Ascent
Haven
Bind
Three maps. I feel like Ascent will be close. If liquid takes their map pick, 2-0 liquid.
is Jamppi finally waking up from his sleep that lasted throughout the beginning of the week?
guys, any1 know how some of them get insane colors? looks like sweetfx from csgo? :D
vikings lost before the first round even started...
- by picking ascent against liquid
- picking yoru and not even having good set strats
gtn, time to go
there is no way a team wins if their duelists doesnt perform
frz is also playing extremely bad
I don't care who wins. This is just bad Valorant game plays. Not exciting at all lol.
people blaming on duelist, but even with good duelist, VKS will still lose.
they just got outplayed macro wise.
funny how liquid said they got dominated by vks in scrims xD not that scrims matter but ye, i guess u could use some of that scrim practice and turn it into a match :) what do i know i aint pro kekw
you think so i thought if they had someone like tenz or shahz they could definitely do better
Sacy is idiot to said that, he thinks only because BR Server have some pugstars he can compare them to someone like TenZ
Holy fuck, that frz Jett should be ashamed for even trying to play Jett. What the hell is that aim.
Their tactics aren't even bad. It's just execution and pure aim. Their Jett has worse fragging score than the rest of the players.
cut frz and gtn, just get heat and mwzera and this would actually be a good team lol
I did not see that, there was no aggression, any atempt of first pics.. FRZ in the last rounds stay 1min with operator locked in a single spot in a 3 bomb map..
There was aggression at the beginning of the maps, but that got easily shut down/countered as the games went on. I think it simply comes down to BR style being figured out, therefore making BR players to play something else which of course they are quite uncomfortable playing to begin with.
BR style is very easy to figure out, i dont think that is the problem.. I think our duelists needs to be better for our style to work.. But our teams with the best duelists did not qualify so.. Hhaha.. I would rather loose playing like Xand or Mwzera than loose like this..
You right, to be aggressive, duelists are the best, but on VKS they don't perform well, so the aggressive factor doesn't fit
BR style is very easy to figure out, i dont think that is the problem..
I think it is a problem in the current meta, there are far too many agents that can shut BR style quite effortlessly. Astra, Viper, Sage come to mind in particular.
I agree with you, especialy this Viper meta.. I think they bufferd her too much and that ruin our style, in fact thats what made Gamelanders loose the Masters spot..
in fact thats what made Gamelanders loose the Masters spot..
Pretty much my thoughts too, Gamelanders simply had no answer to viper's bullshit
First map was good i think from vks since they did not win the pistols.. But second map was not good, but better than sentinels anyway.. I think overall BR teams choked..
This thread has been locked.
Discord