Sharks 2 - 1 Nuturn
SHK
NU
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2.10 2.17 1.96 | 311 328 279 | 22 16 6 | / 6 3 3 / | 9 8 1 | +16 +13 +3 | 72% 83% 50% | 199 198 201 | 47% 50% 40% | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
1.42 1.54 1.16 | 259 264 251 | 15 10 5 | / 9 5 4 / | 7 7 0 | +6 +5 +1 | 78% 92% 50% | 168 174 155 | 25% 22% 33% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.33 1.57 0.85 | 337 363 286 | 20 16 4 | / 14 8 6 / | 6 2 4 | +6 +8 -2 | 78% 75% 83% | 198 239 118 | 26% 28% 21% | 6 4 2 | 5 3 2 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.68 0.78 0.48 | 143 160 111 | 9 7 2 | / 12 7 5 / | 0 0 0 | -3 0 -3 | 67% 67% 67% | 92 102 72 | 17% 19% 13% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.61 0.83 0.17 | 86 83 96 | 5 3 2 | / 10 5 5 / | 7 6 1 | -5 -2 -3 | 72% 83% 50% | 46 55 28 | 9% 14% 0% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.93 1.12 0.84 | 221 227 218 | 13 5 8 | / 14 4 10 / | 3 1 2 | -1 +1 -2 | 67% 100% 50% | 149 135 156 | 33% 27% 39% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.86 0.84 0.86 | 190 145 213 | 11 3 8 | / 13 3 10 / | 2 2 0 | -2 0 -2 | 61% 67% 58% | 114 93 124 | 34% 14% 53% | 2 0 2 | 2 2 0 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
0.77 1.38 0.46 | 180 316 113 | 11 7 4 | / 14 4 10 / | 1 1 0 | -3 +3 -6 | 50% 83% 33% | 101 156 74 | 22% 26% 18% | 2 2 0 | 3 0 3 | -1 +2 -3 | |
|
0.61 1.09 0.36 | 157 240 116 | 8 5 3 | / 15 3 12 / | 1 1 0 | -7 +2 -9 | 56% 100% 33% | 105 131 92 | 14% 25% 8% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.51 0.37 0.58 | 134 107 148 | 8 3 5 | / 15 5 10 / | 2 0 2 | -7 -2 -5 | 56% 50% 58% | 75 39 93 | 32% 40% 29% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.34 1.36 1.35 | 238 223 257 | 47 25 22 | / 34 17 17 / | 12 8 4 | +13 +8 +5 | 54% 57% 50% | 145 137 155 | 33% 37% 28% | 9 4 5 | 6 1 5 | +3 +3 0 | |
|
0.98 0.68 0.85 | 216 224 206 | 37 24 13 | / 44 22 22 / | 12 4 8 | -7 +2 -9 | 59% 50% 71% | 132 146 115 | 25% 26% 22% | 10 7 3 | 13 10 3 | -3 -3 0 | |
|
0.89 0.62 0.77 | 149 160 137 | 25 14 11 | / 39 20 19 / | 18 14 4 | -14 -6 -8 | 54% 67% 38% | 91 99 81 | 22% 24% 19% | 1 1 0 | 3 1 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.77 0.63 0.71 | 148 160 135 | 26 16 10 | / 40 20 20 / | 3 2 1 | -14 -4 -10 | 57% 57% 58% | 93 102 83 | 28% 27% 31% | 0 0 0 | 5 3 2 | -5 -3 -2 | |
|
0.75 0.52 0.65 | 116 93 146 | 18 8 10 | / 40 18 22 / | 17 10 7 | -22 -10 -12 | 63% 70% 54% | 73 61 87 | 17% 16% 18% | 2 1 1 | 5 2 3 | -3 -1 -2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.52 1.05 1.26 | 224 268 189 | 40 23 17 | / 29 13 16 / | 21 13 8 | +11 +10 +1 | 76% 88% 67% | 151 180 128 | 27% 39% 18% | 6 3 3 | 3 1 2 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
1.52 1.01 1.24 | 228 284 185 | 45 26 19 | / 31 13 18 / | 12 5 7 | +14 +13 +1 | 74% 88% 63% | 126 149 108 | 24% 24% 25% | 8 6 2 | 4 1 3 | +4 +5 -1 | |
|
1.25 0.88 1.04 | 207 233 186 | 39 20 19 | / 31 11 20 / | 12 8 4 | +8 +9 -1 | 76% 88% 67% | 121 141 106 | 25% 29% 22% | 5 1 4 | 2 0 2 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
0.84 1.08 0.97 | 211 204 217 | 38 16 22 | / 32 17 15 / | 16 9 7 | +6 -1 +7 | 72% 75% 70% | 118 98 134 | 23% 23% 23% | 6 3 3 | 4 1 3 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
0.88 1.03 0.96 | 184 159 205 | 35 15 20 | / 30 13 17 / | 7 5 2 | +5 +2 +3 | 67% 67% 67% | 117 108 124 | 27% 24% 30% | 7 2 5 | 9 6 3 | -2 -4 +2 |
SHK
NU
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.06 1.32 0.94 | 196 224 184 | 13 5 8 | / 13 3 10 / | 2 2 0 | 0 +2 -2 | 61% 67% 58% | 118 128 113 | 54% 50% 57% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.90 1.32 0.69 | 204 251 182 | 13 6 7 | / 15 4 11 / | 2 0 2 | -2 +2 -4 | 50% 67% 42% | 122 134 117 | 36% 50% 29% | 3 2 1 | 4 0 4 | -1 +2 -3 | |
|
0.69 0.61 0.74 | 155 92 187 | 8 1 7 | / 15 4 11 / | 5 3 2 | -7 -3 -4 | 61% 83% 50% | 102 70 117 | 17% 13% 19% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.67 1.25 0.38 | 168 248 128 | 8 5 3 | / 15 3 12 / | 5 1 4 | -7 +2 -9 | 56% 50% 58% | 116 156 97 | 18% 25% 12% | 2 2 0 | 2 1 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.35 0.63 0.21 | 77 118 57 | 4 2 2 | / 15 4 11 / | 6 4 2 | -11 -2 -9 | 44% 83% 25% | 39 45 36 | 15% 33% 0% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.75 1.83 1.61 | 315 299 349 | 21 14 7 | / 9 5 4 / | 3 3 0 | +12 +9 +3 | 83% 92% 67% | 166 159 179 | 28% 26% 33% | 5 4 1 | 0 0 0 | +5 +4 +1 | |
|
1.30 1.73 0.43 | 220 299 64 | 14 13 1 | / 10 6 4 / | 11 9 2 | +4 +7 -3 | 78% 92% 50% | 153 214 32 | 44% 55% 0% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
1.27 1.47 0.87 | 233 243 214 | 15 10 5 | / 8 4 4 / | 5 5 0 | +7 +6 +1 | 78% 83% 67% | 142 182 63 | 34% 34% 33% | 2 1 1 | 2 0 2 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.02 1.33 0.39 | 174 218 87 | 12 11 1 | / 9 5 4 / | 3 2 1 | +3 +6 -3 | 67% 83% 33% | 131 161 72 | 30% 33% 22% | 2 2 0 | 3 1 2 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
0.94 0.88 1.06 | 185 185 186 | 11 7 4 | / 10 7 3 / | 9 8 1 | +1 0 +1 | 72% 83% 50% | 109 117 94 | 30% 35% 18% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 |
SHK
NU
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.05 0.52 2.12 | 198 106 384 | 12 3 9 | / 13 10 3 / | 1 0 1 | -1 -7 +6 | 39% 25% 67% | 115 79 186 | 15% 9% 21% | 3 0 3 | 2 1 1 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.64 0.75 0.43 | 107 105 113 | 5 4 1 | / 15 9 6 / | 5 1 4 | -10 -5 -5 | 56% 50% 67% | 70 62 87 | 23% 19% 27% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.55 0.37 0.90 | 111 76 182 | 6 2 4 | / 15 11 4 / | 5 3 2 | -9 -9 0 | 39% 33% 50% | 67 52 96 | 20% 25% 18% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.54 0.25 1.13 | 142 73 280 | 9 3 6 | / 15 11 4 / | 1 1 0 | -6 -8 +2 | 44% 25% 83% | 82 49 149 | 32% 25% 37% | 2 1 1 | 6 6 0 | -4 -5 +1 | |
|
0.39 0.50 0.16 | 105 127 63 | 4 4 0 | / 15 10 5 / | 1 0 1 | -11 -6 -5 | 44% 42% 50% | 69 88 31 | 22% 22% 22% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.55 1.49 1.58 | 231 248 223 | 13 5 8 | / 5 3 2 / | 7 3 4 | +8 +2 +6 | 83% 67% 92% | 151 159 147 | 14% 25% 11% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.47 1.24 1.58 | 314 339 302 | 19 6 13 | / 7 5 2 / | 5 1 4 | +12 +1 +11 | 89% 83% 92% | 170 118 196 | 16% 8% 21% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.26 0.98 1.40 | 230 206 243 | 16 5 11 | / 8 4 4 / | 6 2 4 | +8 +1 +7 | 94% 83% 100% | 117 68 141 | 27% 13% 32% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.19 1.05 1.26 | 190 223 174 | 13 5 8 | / 8 4 4 / | 8 1 7 | +5 +1 +4 | 89% 83% 92% | 112 121 108 | 20% 16% 24% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.00 0.03 1.52 | 187 52 255 | 12 1 11 | / 8 5 3 / | 2 1 1 | +4 -4 +8 | 72% 33% 92% | 106 17 151 | 13% 0% 16% | 3 0 3 | 4 3 1 | -1 -3 +2 |
Sharks 0 - 2 NUTURN
EDIT:
Sharks 2-1. This could go easily go either way imo and it should be a close one.
This match is really dangerous for Sharks, even being my guess. I think KR and BR are the most creative regions, so wins who surprises the other most.
Sharks 2-0 Nuturn (60% vs 40%)
Sharks have better players and make better decisions in the middle of the round, they have much better aim, but Nuturn can surprise with new tactics and compositions.
Close match here, but I don't see Nuturn winning this. Sharks have players with better aim, a different style to play and to be read by NU
EZ game for NUTURN they outperformed Vision strikers what more do you want
I could see Nuturn getting a map, but I'm going for 2-0 Sharks. Based on what I've watched NA EU BR (not in order), are the major and best regions in this tournament. Until Korea has more of a player base I'm going BR.
BR second seed goes straight to upper round 2 but fnatic has to play in round 1?
I think Nuturn is really a team to beat in this tournament! Amazing team, treat to watch.
i think it's because they " Team Points" in the rankings are better than Sharks
go put some money on Sharks then. It is good to take advantage in early days of esports because I think the odds sometimes are not acccurate. For example, last time VS vs Nuturn, they got Nuturn odds at 4.0 or something like that, and I made some money that way
rooting for nuturn, one of the best matches we see this round, second to fnc/kru vs sen
2-1 Sharks, but it will be a close BO3. I bet there may be one or two overtimes.
To the people who said Sharks 2-0 Nuturn, I hope you sold the house and went all in on Sharks because according to you baffoons the odds are saying this is free money.
Can't wait to make a clown out of XQOM after this.
Let's go! I see a lot of ppl underestimating SHK. I really think they will make a good run (5-6 th).
So far, this is just pure outaiming and outbraining by Sharks. I know it's early, but those were some impressive damn rounds.
The utility from Nuturn is super cool, but super cool utility doesn't matter when these cracked guys are shooting your heads off.
They have good timing reads and flank watches too. They know when to be aggro, how to get info and to starve info and how to midround.
Nuturn played way more reactively when it came to tactics, except for like 3 rounds where they started pushing stuff, but there sharks just turtled and outaimed them.
Didn't think Nuturn would be so trash lol. Regardless of who picked the map, I think their strats and utilities usage are not good.
Edit: Now they are the ones doing 13-5 lol.
they're atleast 3x times better than CR tbh, so matematicaly they would win V1
Odds were way off.
https://www.vlr.gg/19520/nuturn-is-favored-heavily-over-sharks
Sharks just farming.
I thought sharks had a good shot at this one, but i thought it would be closer.
Today Asian Valorant scene got exposed as not being world-class competitive. NUTURN completely dominated Korea, yet can't show anything internationally.
Their best player in Korea is on c9 so yeah, their scene is dead skillwise in reality.
First map is not even over yet, and people is already trash talking Nuturn. And heaven is not their pick btw...
my my. That spam lineup by sova, is next level stuff. Will surely see more of that for sure.
bad enough they are able to take a map off a BR team 13-5. yeah KR pretty bad I suppose, since BR team is not even a strong competitor
yea someone did say that sharks are beasts in haven, guess this map won't be the same
Their second best map is Ascent with 75% winrate not sure if this it will be enough to win
Haven winrate for sharks: 89% (best %)
Bind winrate for sharks: 50%
Haven winrate for nuturn: 81%
Bind winrate for nuturn: 83% (best %)
Doesn't explain it alone, but the way Nuturn are approaching this map right now is way different. It's like a different set-up for each round. Their aim seems warmed up too.
sharks stomp map 1
very probable nuturn stomp map 2 at this rate.
The Slobberknocker!
That was how to play bind 101
Any team just watch that, perfect t side by NU with the use of teleporters
Perfect calls
weird how last 40mins when bind is being played, there's not 1 brazilian comment lmao.
Sharks is a really good team in heaven and Nuturn proved be very superior on bind, lets see this 3 map
Nuturn has 73% winrate on Ascent. Lower than Sharks but still clapping them right now.
Sharks only look beast in one map, lmao. Where are all Brazilians now ???
Holy shit. Thank god this is not a Sharks stomp. The Korean scene needs this.
Nobody has stolen spots, TR and CIS will be their own spots. There is a pandemic occurring
Nuturn's strategy is laughable....real teams like liquid and v1 will expose their over-aggressive playstyle
nuturn looks even better than 1-2 months ago, but sharks look so fucking broken on ascent. not clearing corners, dry peeking op, late recon util, not playing the meta. it’s ugly :(
e: im still praying shk win for my pickems
finally you said something smart.
in fact, latin americans are not good in mind games, when someone brokes our minds we struggle to come back, just remember 7-1 lmao, after 1-0 till 5-0 was a total blackout of brazilian team.
GG, in haven i think NU were just cold and Sharks were just hitting everything, i don't think that's an indication of anything
NU just seems a superior team
Pelo amor de deus Sharks! Erro atrás de erro nos dois últimos mapas! Levaram 2 stomps seguidos!
FRASAN VS NU - SKILLS - INSANE AIM - MAGIC - THE MASTERCLASS- HIGHLIGHTS 2021
people complain about KR/JP getting a spot, but how did BR even get 2 spot? KEKW
well we won't know for now yet....
we can say it when the match actually happen.
You: thinks Nuturn can't beat Sharks
Also you: thinks V1 can't take a map off Nuturn
Dude, just watch the games and calm down. None of us know what's going to happen until it happens
Im just saying, there is a gap between the 1 Seed and the 2 Seed in Brazil and NA, if you think that we dont deserved a 2 spot than NA doenst deserve tho. And i did think that nuturn could win against sharks lol
Sad to se sharks losing, but cool that Koreas can be competitive. Hope that sharks do well in lower and VKS shows why they are the 1 seed
Sharks god team, but solo and peri oldest cstrike1.6 proplayers (1991 and 1988)
Nuturn adapted so fast to Sharks' tactics on map 1 they totally destroyed the brazilians on maps 2 and 3.
Sharks is just TR all over again. Dry peeks everything and hope for superior aim. I hope vks will be different not "different" like everyone said futbolist are