Not my favorites teams but I wouldn't mind seeing SEN vs TSM here
April 25, 2021
3:00 PM EDT
Patch 2.06
Viper and Yoru buffs
HRTF Audio
C9 pick Bind; C9 pick Haven; SEN pick Split; SEN pick Icebox; Ascent remains
VODs
Maps/Stats
All Kills
First Kills
Op Kills
ShahZaM
SEN
|
dapr
SEN
|
TenZ
SEN
|
zombs
SEN
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
poiz
C9
|
5
7
-2
|
2
9
-7
|
8
15
-7
|
13
7
+6
|
6
16
-10
|
|
leaf
C9
|
10
8
+2
|
9
9
+0
|
7
15
-8
|
5
8
-3
|
5
11
-6
|
|
xeta
C9
|
7
6
+1
|
12
9
+3
|
9
11
-2
|
9
5
+4
|
6
19
-13
|
|
floppy
C9
|
6
5
+1
|
6
3
+3
|
5
9
-4
|
7
12
-5
|
9
18
-9
|
|
mitch
C9
|
8
12
-4
|
10
12
-2
|
13
10
+3
|
6
8
-2
|
10
7
+3
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
dapr
SEN
|
TenZ
SEN
|
zombs
SEN
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
poiz
C9
|
2
0
+2
|
0
1
-1
|
1
3
-2
|
3
2
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
|
leaf
C9
|
4
3
+1
|
0
3
-3
|
1
6
-5
|
2
3
-1
|
1
1
+0
|
|
xeta
C9
|
|
1
0
+1
|
2
1
+1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
floppy
C9
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
2
1
+1
|
2
1
+1
|
2
1
+1
|
|
mitch
C9
|
0
2
-2
|
1
1
+0
|
2
1
+1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
dapr
SEN
|
TenZ
SEN
|
zombs
SEN
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
poiz
C9
|
0
2
-2
|
|
0
2
-2
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
leaf
C9
|
0
1
-1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
xeta
C9
|
0
1
-1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
floppy
C9
|
0
2
-2
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
mitch
C9
|
0
3
-3
|
|
|
|
|
| 2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
xeta
C9
|
|
9
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
6
|
0
|
|
mitch
C9
|
|
6
|
3
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
9
|
1
|
|
poiz
C9
|
|
2
|
3
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
3
|
0
|
|
leaf
C9
|
|
5
|
3
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
0
|
1
|
|
floppy
C9
|
|
5
|
1
|
2
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
3
|
1
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
6
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
2
|
1
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
13
|
6
|
1
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
8
|
3
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
3
|
4
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
8
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
1
|
1
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
8
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
3
|
1
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
dapr
SEN
|
TenZ
SEN
|
zombs
SEN
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
poiz
C9
|
0
2
-2
|
0
3
-3
|
2
6
-4
|
5
2
+3
|
0
4
-4
|
|
leaf
C9
|
2
0
+2
|
2
2
+0
|
0
7
-7
|
1
5
-4
|
1
2
-1
|
|
xeta
C9
|
4
1
+3
|
1
6
-5
|
3
3
+0
|
2
2
+0
|
2
5
-3
|
|
floppy
C9
|
3
0
+3
|
1
1
+0
|
2
3
-1
|
2
4
-2
|
1
8
-7
|
|
mitch
C9
|
2
3
-1
|
3
5
-2
|
4
3
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
3
2
+1
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
dapr
SEN
|
TenZ
SEN
|
zombs
SEN
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
poiz
C9
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
1
+0
|
|
|
leaf
C9
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
0
2
-2
|
1
3
-2
|
|
|
xeta
C9
|
|
|
1
1
+0
|
|
|
|
floppy
C9
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
|
|
|
mitch
C9
|
0
1
-1
|
|
1
1
+0
|
|
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
dapr
SEN
|
TenZ
SEN
|
zombs
SEN
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
poiz
C9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
leaf
C9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xeta
C9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
floppy
C9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mitch
C9
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
xeta
C9
|
|
3
Round 13
TenZ zombs
Round 14
TenZ ShahZaM
Round 15
SicK ShahZaM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
1
|
0
|
|
mitch
C9
|
|
2
Round 5
TenZ SicK
Round 12
dapr zombs |
2
Round 11
TenZ dapr SicK
Round 16
TenZ ShahZaM dapr |
|
|
1
Round 16
dapr |
|
|
|
|
73
|
1
|
1
|
|
poiz
C9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
1
|
0
|
|
leaf
C9
|
|
|
1
Round 9
ShahZaM SicK dapr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
0
|
0
|
|
floppy
C9
|
|
1
Round 14
zombs SicK |
|
|
|
1
Round 9
TenZ |
|
|
|
|
42
|
0
|
0
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
2
Round 2
poiz leaf
Round 15
poiz floppy |
3
Round 6
poiz leaf floppy
Round 8
leaf xeta poiz
Round 10
poiz mitch floppy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
0
|
0
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
3
Round 1
leaf poiz
Round 3
poiz floppy
Round 17
poiz floppy |
2
Round 7
floppy xeta mitch
Round 11
leaf poiz floppy |
|
|
1
Round 12
mitch |
|
|
|
|
74
|
1
|
1
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
1
|
0
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
4
Round 1
xeta floppy
Round 4
leaf floppy
Round 5
leaf floppy
Round 16
poiz leaf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
0
|
0
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
3
Round 7
poiz floppy
Round 10
leaf xeta
Round 13
xeta mitch |
2
Round 9
poiz xeta mitch
Round 12
leaf poiz xeta |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
2
|
1
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
dapr
SEN
|
TenZ
SEN
|
zombs
SEN
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
poiz
C9
|
4
2
+2
|
1
4
-3
|
2
3
-1
|
3
3
+0
|
1
5
-4
|
|
leaf
C9
|
1
3
-2
|
1
6
-5
|
2
3
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
2
6
-4
|
|
xeta
C9
|
0
3
-3
|
5
1
+4
|
2
5
-3
|
3
3
+0
|
2
5
-3
|
|
floppy
C9
|
1
2
-1
|
2
1
+1
|
2
3
-1
|
2
6
-4
|
4
3
+1
|
|
mitch
C9
|
3
5
-2
|
3
1
+2
|
3
4
-1
|
3
4
-1
|
2
2
+0
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
dapr
SEN
|
TenZ
SEN
|
zombs
SEN
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
poiz
C9
|
1
0
+1
|
|
1
1
+0
|
0
1
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
leaf
C9
|
0
2
-2
|
0
2
-2
|
0
1
-1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
xeta
C9
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
floppy
C9
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
1
+0
|
2
1
+1
|
|
|
mitch
C9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
dapr
SEN
|
TenZ
SEN
|
zombs
SEN
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
poiz
C9
|
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
|
|
leaf
C9
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
xeta
C9
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
floppy
C9
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
mitch
C9
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
xeta
C9
|
|
3
Round 5
 dapr  SicK
Round 6
dapr zombs
Round 19
dapr  TenZ |
1
Round 18
dapr TenZ zombs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
3
|
0
|
|
mitch
C9
|
|
3
Round 2
zombs SicK
Round 6
TenZ ShahZaM
Round 13
dapr ShahZaM |
|
|
|
1
Round 2
SicK |
|
|
|
|
56
|
3
|
0
|
|
poiz
C9
|
|
2
Round 7
ShahZaM zombs
Round 9
zombs ShahZaM |
1
Round 3
dapr TenZ zombs |
|
|
1
Round 7
zombs |
|
|
|
|
39
|
2
|
0
|
|
leaf
C9
|
|
1
Round 2
TenZ ShahZaM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
0
|
0
|
|
floppy
C9
|
|
2
Round 7
TenZ SicK
Round 11
TenZ dapr floppy |
|
1
Round 12
zombs dapr ShahZaM SicK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
3
|
0
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
4
Round 4
floppy mitch
Round 5
leaf xeta
Round 12
poiz xeta
Round 17
xeta mitch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
0
|
1
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
4
Round 2
leaf xeta
Round 8
poiz leaf
Round 9
floppy poiz
Round 19
poiz mitch |
2
Round 13
floppy poiz xeta
Round 15
poiz xeta mitch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
4
|
1
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
5
Round 1
mitch floppy
Round 7
leaf mitch
Round 8
xeta mitch
Round 10
mitch poiz
Round 18
leaf xeta |
|
|
|
2
Round 18
xeta
Round 19
floppy |
|
|
|
|
64
|
1
|
3
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
2
Round 2
poiz floppy
Round 3
mitch floppy |
1
Round 16
poiz mitch floppy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
1
|
0
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
3
Round 5
mitch poiz
Round 14
floppy poiz
Round 16
leaf xeta |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
1
|
0
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
dapr
SEN
|
TenZ
SEN
|
zombs
SEN
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
poiz
C9
|
1
3
-2
|
1
2
-1
|
4
6
-2
|
5
2
+3
|
5
7
-2
|
|
leaf
C9
|
7
5
+2
|
6
1
+5
|
5
5
+0
|
3
3
+0
|
2
3
-1
|
|
xeta
C9
|
3
2
+1
|
6
2
+4
|
4
3
+1
|
4
0
+4
|
2
9
-7
|
|
floppy
C9
|
2
3
-1
|
3
1
+2
|
1
3
-2
|
3
2
+1
|
4
7
-3
|
|
mitch
C9
|
3
4
-1
|
4
6
-2
|
6
3
+3
|
2
3
-1
|
5
3
+2
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
dapr
SEN
|
TenZ
SEN
|
zombs
SEN
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
poiz
C9
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
2
0
+2
|
1
0
+1
|
|
leaf
C9
|
3
1
+2
|
|
1
3
-2
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
xeta
C9
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
|
floppy
C9
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
2
1
+1
|
|
mitch
C9
|
0
1
-1
|
1
1
+0
|
1
0
+1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
dapr
SEN
|
TenZ
SEN
|
zombs
SEN
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
poiz
C9
|
0
2
-2
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
leaf
C9
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
xeta
C9
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
floppy
C9
|
0
2
-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
mitch
C9
|
0
3
-3
|
|
|
|
|
| 2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
xeta
C9
|
|
3
Round 12
ShahZaM zombs
Round 22
TenZ dapr
Round 26
dapr zombs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
2
|
0
|
|
mitch
C9
|
|
1
Round 2
zombs ShahZaM |
1
Round 24
SicK ShahZaM TenZ |
|
1
Round 7
TenZ dapr zombs SicK ShahZaM |
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
5
|
0
|
|
poiz
C9
|
|
|
2
Round 4
ShahZaM zombs TenZ
Round 6
TenZ dapr SicK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
0
|
0
|
|
leaf
C9
|
|
4
Round 5
dapr ShahZaM
Round 8
dapr TenZ
Round 12
TenZ dapr
Round 20
zombs ShahZaM |
2
Round 3
TenZ SicK dapr
Round 21
TenZ ShahZaM zombs |
1
Round 1
ShahZaM TenZ poiz dapr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
0
|
1
|
|
floppy
C9
|
|
2
Round 2
SicK dapr
Round 5
SicK zombs |
1
Round 23
TenZ dapr zombs |
1
Round 17
zombs dapr ShahZaM SicK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
0
|
1
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
|
2
Round 9
poiz floppy mitch
Round 18
leaf xeta floppy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
2
|
0
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
6
Round 10
floppy mitch
Round 15
floppy xeta
Round 16
leaf xeta
Round 21
poiz mitch
Round 24
poiz xeta
Round 26
floppy xeta |
2
Round 22
leaf xeta floppy
Round 25
leaf xeta poiz |
1
Round 13
poiz xeta floppy mitch |
|
1
Round 17
floppy |
|
|
|
|
60
|
3
|
1
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
2
Round 8
floppy leaf
Round 23
leaf poiz |
|
|
|
1
Round 8
leaf |
|
|
|
|
46
|
1
|
1
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
2
Round 11
leaf poiz
Round 17
leaf poiz |
|
|
|
1
Round 24
mitch |
|
|
|
|
31
|
0
|
1
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
2
Round 3
mitch xeta
Round 26
leaf poiz |
1
Round 14
mitch floppy xeta |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
0
|
0
|
Stats from this map are not available yet
Stats from this map are not available yet
Head-to-head
Past Matches
SEN beat ABX. Then T1 beats C9. Then SEN beat T1. TSM vs SEN upper finals. SEN wins and TSM vs IMT for lower finals. TSM win and face SEN in grand. SEN win and sweep all. (I know very bold predictions and watch me get everything wrong but idc)
Well you definitely called it. At least the part where you get everything wrong lol
This could be SEN vs any team tbh so im going to just make a random guess and say SEN vs IMT
ayt prediction would be SEN vs TSM/NRG (come back and look at this fail so bad im so bad at predicting lol)
I hope TSM v SEN. If so it would be a game for the ages. Although think SEN would come out on top assuming Sick/Tenz show up
I hope it's SEN vs TSM, it's been a months since the last time they meet with each other. Iirc the last time they meet is in JBL Quantum when SEN beat TSM 13-1
If it really does happen i hope it going to be close match like on FaZe Invitational
NRG is the dark horse for this tournament. S0m and android look really good.
But my finals prediction is TSM vs Sentinels just for old times sake.
6 man roster could really abuse how teams anti strat against TSM if done correctly. But TSM needs to prove their consistency other than letting Wardell's AWP and Drone's fragging abilities carry through.
Drone hasn't been fragging for a while bud and Wardell's back about to give up from all that carrying.
Tbh idk how people even consider TSM going to the finals. They are lacking.
I remember that s0m was a prodigy who was just as promising as TenZ in CS:GO, but the games I saw he was by far the bottom frag. 26 frags across 2 or even 3 maps is problematic imo. thought that he was supposed to be a star in nrg
impact frags baby in ascent poor first map, both teams really didn't give a fuck
they really could, they just gotta beat andbox and hopefully win the rematch vs IMT
I believe. Even though floppy is new and isnt looking very good I do think the rest of the team is playing well enough that they could make it. If NRG saves strats and doesn't tryhard as much as usual C9 could make it.
(I know i will be wrong but no one predicted this outcome so i will take a shot)
C9 vs andbox
welp .. i was wrong..
If floppy plays the same as he played against NRG, C9 will even dominate SEN
i reallly hope they do. I mean poiz, floppy and leaf all looking strong right now
C9B vs SEN
Winner of this match gets to permanently keep TENZ, I don't make the rules
I know, It really was a shock to see Dev1ce go to NIP and I really want to see wh they get to replace him.
3-1 SEN, SEN is going to look shaky at first and lose map 1, but Shaz will have a good read on C9
a lot of ppl thought that would happen when faze was hard smeaging. but who knows what could happen
A win-win situation for C9. It's either their team wins or make Tenz's price tag higher lol
Prediction: 3-2 C9
Not really... if u lose this u play NV... so u have a much higher chance of going to lower brackets... but if u win u play V1 which imo is the weakest team to qual
honestly i feel like both these teams could take on NV just 100T is harder imo.
I think if C9 win this they can have a real shot at iceland but you never know.
hoping for a 3-2 for C9 very excited to watch tenz vs c9
Hard to see who wins this. Sent should take ascent and icebox as those are their best maps. I could see cloud9 taking split. Haven and bind could go either way. Hopefully, no one gets stomped and my prediction is completely wrong but sent win this like 3-1.
C9 taking split is good for Sen, considering the fact that TenZ plays Reyna like he did against And Box. Given these assumptions Sen will prolly take this 3-1
Im very disappointed in you. You follow esports so much and you still don't realize that the grand finals are always bo5. Tsk tsk tsk
Who will throw harder?
Loser gets the easier side of the bracket with xset envy nrg....
Winner has to go up against the cracked csgo team V1 and then 100T/andbox
Its either you play V1 then 100T or Envy then XSET. I think they are both equally hard brackets except on the second side you have the hard team first, so you don't wanna play them first because you will lose momentum.
The ceo of C9 telling TenZ to throw cuz technically TenZ is still under their contract.
I know SEN is a strong team but I think you are underestimating C9 here.
Everyone in C9 is popping off right now
Floppy was having a hard time but if you saw C9 vs NRG ... he shitted on them
if they play like that, this match def will not be ah one-sided and C9 may win 3-2, 3-1.
Imma C9 fan so i might be biased :)
its time to show you guys made ah huge progress C9...
Win this :)
i believe in them
I think plenty of people are overrating C9, they're doing good and have insane potential, but they're not top 1 NA yet. However, SEN are dogs rn so 3-1 C9B
Tbh i dont think they are overrated. Im a C9 fan so a little biased but they have been dominating every team with 2-0’s. They also beat Gen g and IMT last challenger
We gonna see TenZ and good friends vs Poiz and boiz in the SEN vs C9 grand final SHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
wow such a good matchup. I think sentinel will win this 3-1. Can't wait to watch!
C9 is looking more crisp :( The fact that they just added Floppy to the roster and he is fresh from the CSGO scene. But still, I will be going for "Shahzam and Fam" against "Poiz and the Boyz".
tbh c9 could win this if sen plays like they have in the last 2 tourneys plus c9 has been looking very good imo
I really wanted c9 to win this. but looking at Sen i dont think they would have an easy time winning this match. neverless, looking forward to it tonight!
I like how INDIANS make a very huge part of this community and ironically they are the very only few people to not be even given a chance to compete in the VCT. /SUCKS
Riot NEEDS to put INDIA on the map and fkin soon.
Yesss, there is already news that maybe Riot is giving a chance to India for Champions. Hopefully.
no way C9 is using this comp haha i guess this is what you do when you play a seeding match on ur map ban
C9 are so dumb why would they troll this match
if they beat SEN, they play V1 in the first round
if they lose, they have to play vs Envy
cmon fellas
well considering C9 have it harder against 100t rather than NV or XSET, it makes sense
and they probably want either 100t or SEN out on the second round
C9 would lose to NV, people seriously underestimate NV in early round matchups.
if you're trying to go to Iceland it doesn't matter what your second round matchup is or what side of the bracket you are since you'll have to play all the best teams either way
you have to get top 2 in the next stage to qualify for Iceland. It doesn't matter who u play first there is not gonna be an easy path to top 2.
WHY DID I DOUBT SEN? C9 3-13’D ON THEIR MAP PICK LMAO! 3-0 FOR SEN
Edit: jkkkk
i dont know if you are trolling but C9 was def trolling... i mean bind is there pick but its not "THEIR" map...its like their insta ban map...lmao
SEN might have won even c9 played seriously but def it wouldnt have been ah 3-13
You do realize SEN perma ban Bind too right? It's not a good look regardless.
well but still if C9 really tried ,the map would have atleast gone 9-13 ...not ah lowly 3-13
people complained about the map advantage so they toof it off a couple tournaments ago
and upper brackets will choose first 2 maps then lower bracket right?
C9 is throwing bcz they don't want to face 100T if they beat V1 xd...
But atleast i would like to see ah close match not like this trolling with YORU...lmao
I mean C9 has better chance against NV than 100T lets be honest...
if they win against NV ..
i think they can beat NRG or XSET....
This explains C9B loss: https://twitter.com/leaf_cs/status/1386126539016839171?s=19
SHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESH
Sentinels will either do a tactical throw (5Head) and lower TenZ buyout and defeat one of their hardest competitions of NV in finals. Or win and take an easier first game against V1.
That didn't end up happening (as of the start of map 2). They want to prove a point and will take an easier first game of Challengers Finals.
Best Duelist Duo in NA, One of the best controllers, One of the best Sentinels, One of the best IGL and consistent player. Dang, they have to go Iceland man, I wanna see them play against international teams.
About a month ago, when I saw that C9B had like a coach and an assistant coach, I thought they were being extra lol, but now it seems like they are improving A LOT as a team. Worth it i guess
Didn't leaf just confirm they are Tactical throwing here for better match ups? This is lowkey Match Fixing.
i mean that was his personal opinion on seeding and such right? doesn't necessarily mean c9 agrees and that they are throwing. it's a possibility but in this match it doesn't rlly matter anyways since both c9 and sen have already qualified for finals
Seeding Matches should have never exist to be honest. As you said both already qualified but still you can tactical throw to win more Money in the end by placing Bets against your own Team in the end.
bruh just don't dump here without watching C9s previous matches...
this is not even c9s split comp
Bro its not even C9s split comp
Mitch plays-sage
xeta-Skye
Poiz-Reyna
NICE THROW CLOWN 9 BUNCH OF FUCKING CUNTS CSGO TRASH GOING TO VALULRANT JUST TO BE A FKIN RETARDS
WHY DOES EVERY TEAM IN NA WHIFF ON SENTINELS, EVERY SINGLE ONE JUST STARTS AIMING WITH THEIR BIG TOE
To think that SEN would've been disqualified without losers bracket... This is why rito have brainrot for not assigning EU challengers qualifiers losers brackets RO8 and forward.
this is the third challengers event where SEN would not have made it to the grand final if there wasn't double elim. Riot tf are you doing with EU
C9 looked like they were trying new starts cause this match isn't as important
that is true. but personally, i would've wanted to play v1 instead of envy. winning this match would've made it easier but i mean c9 could think differently
Stop saying C9 threw for the better seed... you have to get top 2 to go to Iceland anyways. So you have to fight the good teams regardless. Stop crying and making excuses for the team, let the team make the excuses
True but you know what? C9 might have won a lot of more Money by Tactical Throwing this Match and placing bets against their own Team. This we call Match Fixing.
To everyone who are saying C9 threw...
they were trying new strats and comps.....like that's not their usual comp
so chill the fuck down
cause it's a seeding match and the difficulty of teams they're facing in the next tournament doesn't change that much. NV and XSET are as difficult a bracket as V1 and 100T.
That's not a problem for me to be honest. My concern is that they might have placed Bets against their own Team and this is a crime.
actually if you look at twitter LEAF actually mentioned about these seeding for better understanding you can read that..
https://twitter.com/leaf_cs/status/1386126539016839171?s=19
ask them not me...
i saw so many c9 matches...tbh every c9 match which streamed and they rarely play that comp on split...
i dont even remember them playing bind
Haven their comp was correct but they got fuckeeddd sooo....yeah
I unfoIIowing c9 tenz no shot he goes sentinels....sentinels come on tenz u betray c9 how ccould u do dis. If i was tenzz, i would sabotage the sentinle from the inside like imposter from amongus
Discord