2-0 NSIC I guess
Noia
V1
|
sarahcat
V1
|
alexis
V1
|
meL
V1
|
florescent
V1
|
|
fiziq
NSIC
|
4
5
-1
|
4
3
+1
|
5
5
+0
|
9
1
+8
|
3
4
-1
|
oderus
NSIC
|
5
4
+1
|
10
4
+6
|
5
2
+3
|
6
4
+2
|
4
1
+3
|
epathy
NSIC
|
6
4
+2
|
5
3
+2
|
4
2
+2
|
1
4
-3
|
5
3
+2
|
jakee
NSIC
|
6
2
+4
|
2
3
-1
|
7
1
+6
|
6
6
+0
|
8
5
+3
|
Shawn12590
NSIC
|
7
2
+5
|
7
4
+3
|
7
5
+2
|
6
3
+3
|
9
3
+6
|
Noia
V1
|
sarahcat
V1
|
alexis
V1
|
meL
V1
|
florescent
V1
|
|
fiziq
NSIC
|
1
1
+0
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
oderus
NSIC
|
0
1
-1
|
1
1
+0
|
|
1
1
+0
|
2
1
+1
|
epathy
NSIC
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
3
0
+3
|
jakee
NSIC
|
2
0
+2
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
4
0
+4
|
Shawn12590
NSIC
|
1
1
+0
|
0
2
-2
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
Noia
V1
|
sarahcat
V1
|
alexis
V1
|
meL
V1
|
florescent
V1
|
|
fiziq
NSIC
|
|
|
|
|
|
oderus
NSIC
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
epathy
NSIC
|
3
0
+3
|
3
0
+3
|
|
|
2
0
+2
|
jakee
NSIC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shawn12590
NSIC
|
|
|
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
fiziq
NSIC
|
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
67
|
3
|
0
|
epathy
NSIC
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
1
|
1
|
oderus
NSIC
|
|
5
|
4
|
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
67
|
1
|
1
|
Shawn12590
NSIC
|
|
10
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
90
|
1
|
2
|
jakee
NSIC
|
|
4
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
0
|
0
|
meL
V1
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
4
|
0
|
alexis
V1
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
4
|
0
|
Noia
V1
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
0
|
0
|
florescent
V1
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
0
|
0
|
sarahcat
V1
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
1
|
0
|
Noia
V1
|
sarahcat
V1
|
alexis
V1
|
meL
V1
|
florescent
V1
|
|
fiziq
NSIC
|
3
2
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
2
4
-2
|
5
0
+5
|
1
2
-1
|
oderus
NSIC
|
3
1
+2
|
6
3
+3
|
3
0
+3
|
3
4
-1
|
3
0
+3
|
epathy
NSIC
|
4
3
+1
|
2
2
+0
|
3
2
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
2
0
+2
|
jakee
NSIC
|
3
2
+1
|
2
2
+0
|
5
0
+5
|
2
4
-2
|
4
4
+0
|
Shawn12590
NSIC
|
2
2
+0
|
3
4
-1
|
1
2
-1
|
3
2
+1
|
5
1
+4
|
Noia
V1
|
sarahcat
V1
|
alexis
V1
|
meL
V1
|
florescent
V1
|
|
fiziq
NSIC
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
oderus
NSIC
|
|
1
1
+0
|
|
1
1
+0
|
1
0
+1
|
epathy
NSIC
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
jakee
NSIC
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
2
0
+2
|
Shawn12590
NSIC
|
0
1
-1
|
0
2
-2
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
Noia
V1
|
sarahcat
V1
|
alexis
V1
|
meL
V1
|
florescent
V1
|
|
fiziq
NSIC
|
|
|
|
|
|
oderus
NSIC
|
|
|
|
|
|
epathy
NSIC
|
2
0
+2
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
jakee
NSIC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shawn12590
NSIC
|
|
|
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
fiziq
NSIC
|
|
3
Round 10
meL
alexis
Round 13
alexis
meL
Round 16
sarahcat
florescent
|
|
|
|
|
1
Round 16
sarahcat
florescent
|
|
|
|
61
|
3
|
0
|
epathy
NSIC
|
|
3
Round 1
florescent
alexis
Round 12
florescent
Noia
Round 15
Noia
alexis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
1
|
0
|
oderus
NSIC
|
|
2
Round 1
Noia
sarahcat
Round 15
florescent
sarahcat
|
3
Round 2
meL
sarahcat
alexis
Round 12
alexis
sarahcat
meL
Round 16
meL
Noia
alexis
|
|
|
1
Round 17
florescent
|
1
Round 1
Noia
sarahcat
|
|
|
|
76
|
0
|
0
|
Shawn12590
NSIC
|
|
2
Round 9
alexis
meL
Round 13
Noia
sarahcat
|
|
1
Round 6
sarahcat
Noia
florescent
meL
|
|
|
|
1
Round 6
meL
florescent
Noia
|
|
|
67
|
1
|
1
|
jakee
NSIC
|
|
3
Round 4
alexis
florescent
Round 9
florescent
Noia
Round 11
meL
alexis
|
2
Round 14
Noia
sarahcat
florescent
Round 17
sarahcat
Noia
alexis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
0
|
0
|
meL
V1
|
|
3
Round 4
Shawn12590
jakee
Round 8
oderus
Shawn12590
Round 13
oderus
jakee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
3
|
0
|
alexis
V1
|
|
2
Round 3
fiziq
Shawn12590
Round 5
fiziq
epathy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
1
|
0
|
Noia
V1
|
|
3
Round 5
jakee
Shawn12590
Round 6
oderus
fiziq
Round 7
Shawn12590
epathy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
0
|
0
|
florescent
V1
|
|
1
Round 1
Shawn12590
fiziq
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
0
|
0
|
sarahcat
V1
|
|
2
Round 3
oderus
epathy
Round 16
oderus
Shawn12590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
1
|
0
|
Noia
V1
|
sarahcat
V1
|
alexis
V1
|
meL
V1
|
florescent
V1
|
|
fiziq
NSIC
|
1
3
-2
|
3
2
+1
|
3
1
+2
|
4
1
+3
|
2
2
+0
|
oderus
NSIC
|
2
3
-1
|
4
1
+3
|
2
2
+0
|
3
0
+3
|
1
1
+0
|
epathy
NSIC
|
2
1
+1
|
3
1
+2
|
1
0
+1
|
0
3
-3
|
3
3
+0
|
jakee
NSIC
|
3
0
+3
|
0
1
-1
|
2
1
+1
|
4
2
+2
|
4
1
+3
|
Shawn12590
NSIC
|
5
0
+5
|
4
0
+4
|
6
3
+3
|
3
1
+2
|
4
2
+2
|
Noia
V1
|
sarahcat
V1
|
alexis
V1
|
meL
V1
|
florescent
V1
|
|
fiziq
NSIC
|
1
1
+0
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
oderus
NSIC
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
1
1
+0
|
epathy
NSIC
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
2
0
+2
|
jakee
NSIC
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
|
2
0
+2
|
Shawn12590
NSIC
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
|
|
Noia
V1
|
sarahcat
V1
|
alexis
V1
|
meL
V1
|
florescent
V1
|
|
fiziq
NSIC
|
|
|
|
|
|
oderus
NSIC
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
epathy
NSIC
|
1
0
+1
|
2
0
+2
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
jakee
NSIC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shawn12590
NSIC
|
|
|
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
fiziq
NSIC
|
|
1
Round 4
alexis
meL
|
1
Round 10
meL
alexis
florescent
|
1
Round 7
Noia
sarahcat
florescent
meL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
0
|
0
|
epathy
NSIC
|
|
2
Round 4
Noia
sarahcat
Round 14
sarahcat
Noia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
0
|
1
|
oderus
NSIC
|
|
3
Round 6
alexis
sarahcat
Round 9
Noia
meL
Round 12
meL
Noia
|
1
Round 8
florescent
meL
alexis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
1
|
1
|
Shawn12590
NSIC
|
|
8
Round 1
Noia
sarahcat
Round 3
Noia
florescent
Round 5
sarahcat
Noia
Round 9
alexis
sarahcat
Round 10
Noia
sarahcat
Round 11
meL
florescent
Round 13
alexis
meL
Round 14
alexis
meL
|
1
Round 2
alexis
florescent
Noia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
0
|
1
|
jakee
NSIC
|
|
1
Round 11
Noia
alexis
|
1
Round 5
meL
alexis
florescent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
0
|
0
|
meL
V1
|
|
1
Round 4
epathy
Shawn12590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
1
|
0
|
alexis
V1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
3
|
0
|
Noia
V1
|
|
1
Round 5
oderus
fiziq
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
0
|
0
|
florescent
V1
|
|
3
Round 6
Shawn12590
fiziq
Round 7
jakee
epathy
Round 11
fiziq
epathy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
0
|
0
|
sarahcat
V1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
0
|
0
|
raynexo [#5]Incorrect Guess
U delusional af if u think they can beat NA top 9, I support them but it's not gonna happen
sheahhhh [#8]NSIC is literally top 5 at this event, ur delusional
i am saying NSIC is going to win. what are u on. i wrote incorrect guess cuz @Scar98 said "2-0 NSIC". it should be "0-2 NSIC" if he is supporting NSIC. the score of the team goes next to the team
Scar98 [#6]U delusional af if u think they can beat NA top 9, I support them but it's not gonna happen
brother u wrote the score wrong. it should be 0-2 NSIC. the treams score goes next to its name
raynexo [#9]i am saying NSIC is going to win. what are u on. i wrote incorrect guess cuz @Scar98 said "2-0 NSIC". it should be "0-2 NSIC" if he is supporting NSIC. the score of the team goes next to the team
i think that dude is saying 2-0 by NSIC
sheahhhh [#11]i think that dude is saying 2-0 by NSIC
yeah i got that now, he wrote it incorrectly so i misunderstood him
TwentySeven [#20]This is actualy going to be a lot closer than yall are expecting just wait
Bro is on acid
TwentySeven [#20]This is actualy going to be a lot closer than yall are expecting just wait
whether its close or not V1 is still gonna lose
raynexo [#12]yeah i got that now, he wrote it incorrectly so i misunderstood him
that's the standard way of writing predictions on vlr???
Raiiii [#41]Is Flor not good anymore?
thats not the case. keep in mind that v1 is a brand new team and in comparison, ex-soar has been dominating the t2 scene with other notable teams for the past year. this result is expected because ex-soar has had more experience playing together as a team and in general. don’t discredit v1 just yet.
aylez [#46]thats not the case. keep in mind that v1 is a brand new team and in comparison, ex-soar has been dominating the t2 scene with other notable teams for the past year. this result is expected because ex-soar has had more experience playing together as a team and in general. don’t discredit v1 just yet.
shawn and jakee are new to the roster
TwentySeven [#20]This is actualy going to be a lot closer than yall are expecting just wait
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
G2ShahZaM [#49]shawn and jakee are new to the roster
okay but this was still expected coming from a brand new GC team anyways.. they dont have as much experience as a whole in comparison to ex-soar. + there is a pretty big difference from top 10 NA team to a new team.
TwentySeven [#20]This is actualy going to be a lot closer than yall are expecting just wait
LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO i mean tbf 5 rounds is more than I expected
SIRRAH [#40]u were generous
tbh i was actually going to put 13-1 but i didnt want to get -10 downvotes from the simps lurking these matches
aylez [#53]okay but this was still expected coming from a brand new GC team anyways.. they dont have as much experience as a whole in comparison to ex-soar. + there is a pretty big difference from top 10 NA team to a new team.
yeah bro dont even start with the excuses. nsic is just LEVELS above.
SIRRAH [#52]I'll eat my shoe, sell my PS5 and donate my PC to a woman's esports charity if V1 make a lower bracket run
they wont, its too difficult to begin with + a surprising number of upsets are now in lower bracket
andrewdamf [#55]tbh i was actually going to put 13-1 but i didnt want to get -10 downvotes from the simps lurking these matches
real
andrewdamf [#56]yeah bro dont even start with the excuses. nsic is just LEVELS above.
what excuses? did i not say top 10 NA team vs a new team? if you cant bear to hear the truth its your problem lmfao. keep hating bro, good personality trait.
aylez [#60]what excuses? did i not say top 10 NA team vs a new team? if you cant bear to hear the truth its your problem lmfao. keep hating bro, good personality trait.
are you actually trolling? jakee and shawn joined the team literally this month. the others just joined some months ago, if we are talking about "experience" 3 players from v1 except flor and sarah have WAY more exp. youre trying to find an argument to their loss when thats just simply not true. maybe use your brain?
andrewdamf [#61]are you actually trolling? jakee and shawn joined the team literally this month. the others just joined some months ago, if we are talking about "experience" 3 players from v1 except flor and sarah have WAY more exp. youre trying to find an argument to their loss when thats just simply not true. maybe use your brain?
1) no i havent made a single excuse for v1s loss, it was very expected. however a reason for this is because they are a brand new team. this is always a big thing to take notice, if a team is brand new, they will not be insane right away. + none of these players have ever played together before except alexis and mel. its not solely about individual experience, also the amount of time they have spent as a team. its purely facts, and can be seen everywhere.
2) they are a full GC team. everyone hates to see it but it is inevitable, there is a skill gap between gc and mainstream vct. however, people have to realize the skill gap wont close if gc teams dont try or play events against mainstream teams. this is v1s first tournament ever and have already done fairly well being the only gc team in ro32. this is a learning experience for the team and helps them know what to improve and work on. + not sure if this is 100% true but florescent is now the igl (? twitter bio) which is a huge change coming from someone who has never done that role before.
v1 wholeheartedly deserved that loss but there is more to it than what everyone is saying. no the players did not fall off and no this team isnt going to be trash. accept the loss, move on and work to be better.
aylez [#65]1) no i havent made a single excuse for v1s loss, it was very expected. however a reason for this is because they are a brand new team. this is always a big thing to take notice, if a team is brand new, they will not be insane right away. + none of these players have ever played together before except alexis and mel. its not solely about individual experience, also the amount of time they have spent as a team. its purely facts, and can be seen everywhere.
2) they are a full GC team. everyone hates to see it but it is inevitable, there is a skill gap between gc and mainstream vct. however, people have to realize the skill gap wont close if gc teams dont try or play events against mainstream teams. this is v1s first tournament ever and have already done fairly well being the only gc team in ro32. this is a learning experience for the team and helps them know what to improve and work on. + not sure if this is 100% true but florescent is now the igl (? twitter bio) which is a huge change coming from someone who has never done that role before.v1 wholeheartedly deserved that loss but there is more to it than what everyone is saying. no the players did not fall off and no this team isnt going to be trash. accept the loss, move on and work to be better.
they dont have as much experience as a whole in comparison to ex-soar.
is literally a definition of an excuse. doenst matter if they had more experience, chemistry, practice. they still would lose. you said theres a skill gap but i dont understand what point youre trying to prove when you are contradicting yourself lmao.
andrewdamf [#67]they dont have as much experience as a whole in comparison to ex-soar.
is literally a definition of an excuse. doenst matter if they had more experience, chemistry, practice. they still would lose. you said theres a skill gap but i dont understand what point youre trying to prove when you are contradicting yourself lmao.
its pure facts, you may just view it as an excuse, but that is on you. if they had practice and team chem, the games would have been closer and they could have even gotten a close map off of ex-soar. there is a skill gap, however that gap wouldnt be as big if v1 was given the opportunity to bootcamp and prepare for the qualifiers. in the end it doesnt matter as it is a great learning experience, however put some respect on v1’s name.
aylez [#69]its pure facts, you may just view it as an excuse, but that is on you. if they had practice and team chem, the games would have been closer and they could have even gotten a close map off of ex-soar. there is a skill gap, however that gap wouldnt be as big if v1 was given the opportunity to bootcamp and prepare for the qualifiers. in the end it doesnt matter as it is a great learning experience, however put some respect on v1’s name.
nice excuse
Rubrik_Duck [#23]that's the standard way of writing predictions on vlr???
is no one understanding what i am saying ((((((((((((
raynexo [#9]i am saying NSIC is going to win. what are u on. i wrote incorrect guess cuz @Scar98 said "2-0 NSIC". it should be "0-2 NSIC" if he is supporting NSIC. the score of the team goes next to the team
It’s normal to say “2-0 NSIC” and it is also correct. Let’s say in the NBA for example if a team like Milwaukee won a series by sweeping them you would say 4-0 Milwaukee you’re not going to say 0-4 Milwaukee
Darkblade [#74]It’s normal to say “2-0 NSIC” and it is also correct. Let’s say in the NBA for example if a team like Milwaukee won a series by sweeping them you would say 4-0 Milwaukee you’re not going to say 0-4 Milwaukee
fuck it