Why tf only 3 teams from EU for champions. Last year there were 4. Same number of teams from NA and EMEA??
0
NA=EMEA??
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
Kiklop [#5]Don't underestimate na. If someone has to get less spots it's latam and Brazil
LSET is horrible, they should give their spot to M3C or TL.
emirerays [#4]last year was 3 also, there were 4 because gambit won berlin
Fpx won copenhagen so why not 4 again
sutta [#8]Fpx won copenhagen so why not 4 again
because masters berlin had direct qual for the winner
Shownu [#6]LSET is horrible, they should give their spot to M3C or TL.
For once I can agree with you tbh, NA secondary team performance at masters has been absolute ass
Subreezy [#14]to be fair, there's only 2-3 good EMEA teams the can hold their own internationally, the rest have internal conflicts atm or can't hold their own like they used to
EMEA team or good, pick one bozo
Realistically the only tournament that EMEA has sent 2 competent teams to was Champions
lilcheese [#2]NA should get 0 until they get a series against EMEA
how are they gonna get a series then
babysasuke [#18]EMEA team or good, pick one bozo
Realistically the only tournament that EMEA has sent 2 competent teams to was Champions
EMEA just got 1st and 4th at Copenhagen, and had 4 teams make it out of groups at champions.
I'm on that NA Copium usually too but you're an addict
Subreezy [#16]EMEA just got 1st and 4th at Copenhagen, and had 4 teams make it out of groups at champions.
I'm on that NA Copium usually too but you're an addict
Idrc about placements, I was watching the games
Fnatic were a disappointment as usual, and FPX overperformed
Nothing to do with NA
Mapusaurus [#12]why not this year tho?
Should both masters give a spot to champs or just the one FPX won?
Subreezy [#14]to be fair, there's only 2-3 good EMEA teams the can hold their own internationally, the rest have internal conflicts atm or can't hold their own like they used to
So you are saying that EMEA should have more slots than NA just like the op
edit: nvm u arent baiter
camosoulja [#13]M3C is the only team in this LCQ that looks good enough to play champions whereas NA has multiple champ level teams like 100T TG Faze and Sentinels. Fair slots.
bro im a SEN fan too but come on they would get shat on at Champs rn
KyLZi [#19]Should both masters give a spot to champs or just the one FPX won?
the most recent one should
camosoulja [#13]M3C is the only team in this LCQ that looks good enough to play champions whereas NA has multiple champ level teams like 100T TG Faze and Sentinels. Fair slots.
100T, Guard, Faze, sentinels would not do better than guild, tl or m3c at champions, stop coping.
patuj [#20]So you are saying that EMEA should have more slots than NA just like the op
edit: nvm u arent baiter
i was saying 3 slots is a fair amount to give, since i can only really see 2-3 EMEA teams performing well internationally
Subreezy [#14]to be fair, there's only 2-3 good EMEA teams the can hold their own internationally, the rest have internal conflicts atm or can't hold their own like they used to
Emea is the deepest region in valorant, but they get less slots than apac or sa
camosoulja [#13]M3C is the only team in this LCQ that looks good enough to play champions whereas NA has multiple champ level teams like 100T TG Faze and Sentinels. Fair slots.
lmaooooooooooooooo
decent bait i give 4/8
Subreezy [#25]i was saying 3 slots is a fair amount to give, since i can only really see 2-3 EMEA teams performing well internationally
I mean all 3 EMEA teams did well in last Masters (Guild got eliminated by the finalist) and even in Masters 1 Team Liquid as 4th seed (even 4th is arguable) got out of groups and did decent. What did APAC 2nd and 3rd seed do? Brazil 2nd seed? LATAM 2nd? Even NA looking at only OpTic looking decent compared to XSET etc.
Discord