Yay is just doing his "el diablo" things....
| Flag: | Scotland |
| Registered: | March 14, 2021 |
| Last post: | June 9, 2024 at 7:40 PM |
| Posts: | 1029 |
Yay is just doing his "el diablo" things....
https://www.vlr.gg/event/stats/466/valorant-champions-tour-stage-3-masters-berlin
nAts 267.9 acs
Asuna 270.6 acs
What a FLEX, given that nAts is playing on Sen/control agents and Asuna is a duelist.
On a more serious note, you don't claim someone is the best in the world based on one match and use terms like "average." You can't make decisions like that. The sample is insignificant and unreliable, from one game. And we're in the environment(like a video game) where probability make up for a significant portion of the game. Meaning that if one small thing went wrong in one game, a player's previous ranking could drop, making a sample size crucial in such estimation to provide consistency - not a one-time thingy at all. More rounds will always be better no matter what.
You are incorrect in your statement. If you're discussing a statistical sample using terms like "AVERAGE," you should also consider "ROUNDS PLAYED." Although Asuna is a fantastic player, he has only played 100 rounds compared to nAts' 197. You rank Asuna based on a short sample size compared to any other Gambit player, therefore you're way off here. We'll have to wait till after today's game against Acend to assess his performance, but not before that. Furthermore, there's no need to rush because conclusions are usually made at the end of competitions.
Back then OG knocked them out, hence why we will not see them in Berlin instead of G2. Despite your flawed logic, I truly hope GG will come back stronger one day.
Sincere condolences to Marqnue and their family.
Yes, as of now he's playing on IMT roster with 144 ping in Nerdstreet Gamers Summer. Check out the latest IMT matches.
I'm not sure whether that's the real cause, given that we're in a new gaming environment and that some of the pros had moved to Valorant with VAC bans from CS as well. I basically paraphrased what he said, only guessing with "possibly," though he may clarify the missing details in the future.
LOL ... Nah bro, I only have 3 that I'm currently monitoring including his. Like the person in comment #7 above said that 1tapping in NA, and on 144 ping(to be correct), is VERY NORMAL to him/her LOL. To which I'd reply that being match MVP with 36k and K:D of 3.0 on the same ping is NOT VERY NORMAL - more like INSANELY GOOD... and the link ofc:
He said that he doesn't play in EU cause he doesn't have same motivation as in NA and that NA region is his dream. Possibly, he had exhausted some paths in EU but looks like he's found the way to get signed in quite short time and in NA and by Immortals - trully amaizing.
Not just a potential but his initial dream is to play in NA.
He peaked at #12 radiants of NA after 329 matches in current E3:A1. All that on average ping of 150....
Come on broski, not like that. He's been quite consistent agains some of the bigest names in NA.
https://tracker.gg/valorant/profile/riot/TwitchEmilShe1n%23EUGUY/overview
No worries, it's just a day in the office....
Let me help you a little here ;)
Define what is a "normal EU radiant" for you or >>>>>>G..T..F...O..<<<<<<
Yeah, I'm here with you my darling ;) Wanna get married so I can teach you how to talk sense?
Do you really want to flex your REAL LIFE on me?
On the other hand, you said, "A normal EU radiant could have played better than Jamppi", so I am calling you out to explain your uneducated and fictional statement, and please enlighten me in your "deep" knowledge.
Define normal EU radiant please.
Jamppi as of current is top 163 EU radiant, and as of last episode is top 253 radiant. I am really confused by what do you might think of a "normal EU radiant."
Cypher:
Nats, Sayf and Chiwawa
Killjoy:
Suygetsu, Logan and Xistou
Cross Cyph/KJ:
Meddo, Suygetsu and Magnum
Sage:
Scream, Hoody and Sheydos
Notable:
Dimasick, Monsteer, Leo and AimDLL/Paura
Edit:
Emil has peaked at #12 top radiant in NA on 144 ping on average - crazy impressive.
https://tracker.gg/valorant/profile/riot/TwitchEmilShe1n%23EUGUY/overview
https://tracker.gg/valorant/profile/riot/SEN%20TenZ%2351770/overview?season=all
That is TenZ's account in EU, the one he played on before Iceland LAN. He had reached only Immoratal but with impressive run.
The coach's absence had always been a huge setback for TSM. We began to witness a more consistent winning performance from them after the arrival of Chet in May - Bang and Levi, of course, further boosted TSM's squad. In my opinion, they need a little more time with their current coach and squad to obtain more experience. They have shown that they have the ability to be a top team; they simply require more time to transfer to the next, stable top 3 levels. By crunching the data, an analyst might perhaps improve their roster even more, relieving the coach and their igl of these responsibilities - only about $20k a year. Last but not least, the team's discipline should be top notch, as competition is becoming more fierce, and individual mechanics will no longer be sufficient to win series.
In general, a skilled coach and analyst may boost any new or struggling team in a variety of ways. Their job is vastly undervalued at the moment, perhaps due to Shahzam's excellent work. But not many teams have someone as giffted as Shahzam who could cover for coach/analyst/igl and grow as individual player + stream 6hr every day, if any teams at all LOL. A coach and an analyst can bring order to teams by providing a vision and reassigning responsibilities from players who must keep up with their own personal development. For instance, after losing Johnta, FPX found itself in a very difficult and vulnerable position. Now, their former analyst must serve as both a coach and a data cruncher for the team which is reflected in their recent negative performance. I'm not going to get into this topic in depth because it would require some research, but both SMB and FF hired EU coaches (Tanizhq and Salah) to tackle EMEA, which has proven to work for Turkish talent, especially SMB. FF also put forth a strong effort, but they were unable to advance due to their possibly inexperienced team and the inexperience of their individualy young talents. VGIA also promoted Pipson to full-time coaching, and with the addition of new players, things began to click for them as well.
Yes, and it appears that this is the only category in which they are above 100t. The difference is merely 25 circuit points, which is a negligible difference.
https://liquipedia.net/valorant/VALORANT_Champions_Tour/2021/Circuit_Points/North_America
The OP claimed that Split was key in winning NV in the 100t equation. However, he/she forgot that NV also won 100t's second best map, Icebox, which, in theory, evens out the score between the two teams. NV should have won their Ascent pick in order to win the game, but they did not. It was their own choice that they failed to win. As some have stated, you can't blame the system that is strategically exploited to win series, hence his whole argument is void of reasoning. Furthermore, the OP is arrogant and delusional, refusing to accept the opinions of others. Like, how does he/she want to discuss thing through his pathetic thread? I just don't know....
No worries and good luck in your Critical Thinking classes.
No, it was not a smug... it was just a simple observation of the past events. No matter what you claim, you just have to consider at least their recent games. 100t won the two recent games and that tells a lot on who is stronger, at least for the time being. We can speculate all day long but if there's no data to support our claims, we just can't consider it legitimate.
Give me a shout, if one day you'd need a lesson in critical thinking - it will cost you $$.
I'm completely puzzled at this point.... Did you actually start this topic just to disagree with people? Or do you believe your view on things is so superior to others' that it allows you to flex your "critical thinking" and black/white thingy? Some of us(cough..cough) on here have sufficient academic experience to provide you with a complete semester on critical thinking and decision-making, let alone comparing two teams.
Technically, 100t are a better team in terms of money won, trophies won - First Strike... and up to date score between the two stands NV 2-4 100t with 100t winnig NV in the last two recent matches. If there's another way to look at it, please let me know.
Since that loss to Andbox 2-0 on 22/04/21, SEN have won 19 Havens and only managed to lose 2 to only one team - XSET. Moreover, between the two on Haven, the score stands SEN 7-1 100t so far - since the beginning.
BTW, SEN's Haven is the best map out of the six ---> SEN's map stats:
https://www.vlr.gg/team/stats/2/sentinels/
You are right.... 100t could've picked Icebox (their 2nd best map) instead of SEN's most played and best map to date - Haven. But tbh, SEN are good on any map, hence it doesn't really matter what you pick against them imho. Maybe 100t thought SEN would not practice Haven enough in favour other maps they've played less, as a counteracting measure. But we can see SEN's Haven is still very intimidating.
Edit: Sorry, 1Header from me.... In bold previously mentioned Ascent replaced for Icebox as Ascent had been banned by SEN.
I don't recognise FPX anymore. They are still a good team but something is missing(obviously... if you look at their match history).
Since Johnta's departure(conflict with management from what I heard), things don't go well for FPX. Not going to lie but I kind of prefered more Johnta as a coach and d00mbr0s as an analyst due to massive work required to prepare for catching up, ascending competition in the region - not just d00mbr0s as of now. However, Johnta with TH already but it is still possible to hire either a coach or an analyst for FPX. Hope Chinese owners realise that and get us someone to strenghtend the squad.
He said about seven months ago that he doesn't want to only play for an org as a sole player, but also have some power over choosing the appropriate players and so on. He and Faze had a thing back when Faze had been forming, but they didn't agree in the end. He also mentioned how much he enjoys streaming but he is open to new opportunities, if the proper one presents itself.
No, that's not the case as Gambit has never been SCRIMBUX team in the first place! Due to coming from CIS, they have to scrim other teams cause of higher level competition outside of CIS but, they are legit top 1 CIS team and a PRO team. Calling them SCRIMBUX team is utterly disrespectful to the boys. This "scrimbux" is for some reason only applies to GAMBIT. As, I said PlatChat have mentioned in the past that but community keep dragging this eventhough PlatChat already moved on. Yes, for people who doesn't follow CIS, Gambit is uknown but that doesn't give them permission to downgrade such pro team calling them "scrimbux" team. Like, imagine you play for a pro team since beginning of Valorant and community keeps calling you a "scrimbux" even though you have won big teams outside of scrims.
Can we stop associating this stupid and inferior term as "scrimbux" with GAMBIT? They have never been a scrimbux team in the f-ing first place! With all due respect to PlatChat boyz, we don't have to keep parroting this bs. They have said it once and have already moved on yet VLR keep parroting this shit. Gambit is legit top tier, CIS top1 team that plays differently, given occasion, tourny or time. They have won big teams from different regions through VCT and are trying their best atm.
Listen, you are criticising MVP of the match. And even such players are not insured against making mistakes on occasions - remember that 5% human error can go to 20% too. Like that was some CRACKING and intensive game, man.
I just wanted to say that all those plays have been agreed within their respective teams. It's not that Yay had suddenly decided to play uber agressive and went on with that approach. Faze are themselves very agressive team and will punish you for playing deep/passive style, hence the agressive response from Yay and NV. But NV lost too many clutches in that game which led to their defeat IMHO. BTW, if you want to spot an agressive Jetts, just check out their first player to die percentage. There is a lot of similarity between variaty of Jetts that kind of divides them in two groups.
Guys it's an agressive style of play on Jett. You push/dash or whatever and get SPACE for your team, picking up few kills before getting killed, if at all. Yay played that Haven very good, getting MVP of the match ffs. Regarding, Wardell or cNed type of Jett style - it's different mainly in its pace. They play slower Jett style compared to TenZ/Derke/Yay and Jamppi. People blaming Jamppi getting killed too quickly forget that they don't know the initial goal of TL on how their Jett should be played. Well, their Jett create space and maybe pick up some kills then ScreaM or rest gets in to clear etc.
Yeah, I know very well about them, and ofc will be watching the match tomorrow - it will be a good test for both teams. Though G2 vs Oxygen is another great test match for both teams - new G2 vs improving Oxygen.
SociablEE impressed me very much especially on Ascent but both looked very intimidating. Given Oxygen's win over Giants, this kind of level from Turkish teams we want to see more.
Bruvvv... neither your "British person's teeth..." nor your "EU val is worse than NA" statements are constructive or objective, because Brits have normal teeth like everyone else, and EU is not worse than NA, judging from a very tight two-game series between FNC and SEN. It's almost as if some NA members have decided to be arrogant and disrespectful to everyone outside of NA, flexing their foolish beliefs on others.
KID, get REAL or F off.
BTW, I'm from CANADA
I eat lots of cheesburgers myself but I don't think that's the reason why Hiko or Ange1(yeah, he also has baby face) has a baby face. And reacton times are irrelevant measure as we haven't put them both in test yet. Quit BS kid.... and leave alone saturated fat rich food as it's my favorite ;)
Cough ... cough ... Hiko is actually OLDER than Ange1 while Steel is 3 months younger.
I expected better from them too but win is a win at the end of the day.
Thank you, bro, for the explanation. I was aware of the translation, but you provided a far more complete breakdown.
Bruhh... you don't even need to play Valorant to have a valid opinion on Pro teams and building strats etc, let alone be highly ranked in this game. As an example, we could look at Forze's ex-coach Pnukh under whom they won CIS's First Strike. Or maybe we could look at Mourinho success in RL football and many more ofc. Should we tell them all they need to be SHUSHED cause they are BOTS?
I've never understood such a NARROW-MINDEDNESS in people like you. Like where do you get those 1Head bollock opinions? How do they form at all in your head?
Discord