calabasa
Country: United States
Registered: March 15, 2023
Last post: August 10, 2023 at 1:58 PM
Posts: 347
1 2 3 4 5 •• 7

no reason, just vibe based. jingggs the goat tho

posted 8 months ago

i just want them to do bad and kick ardiis, so yay can be employed again

posted 9 months ago

Barely beating Bilibili who look absolutely terrible except for Biank. Ardiis statpadding with 0 impact like usual

posted 9 months ago

that sounds wrong, babysasuke has 0 stars and 15k posts

posted 9 months ago

Couldn't break out of Tier 3, and even in ranked he's kind of shit. He's radiant sure, but he has like a 51% win rate and a 1.0 KD after 100's of games on broken characters like Jett and Raze lol. Was this guy ever even that good at CSGO? Like he wasn't ever HLTV top 20 right? So even Ethan clears him? Damn and he's cocky as hell for no reason

posted 9 months ago

lol u see my flair? leaf is an omega talent but hasn't proven jack on LAN and is a choker. the guy I forgot is Zekken, he's probably even better than crashies

posted 9 months ago

i think loud is more successful, (champions > masters) and they win the H2H. I think they're more talented in that, I just straight up think theyre better and can beat more teams. Speaking about Prime LOUD vs Optic btw. Like in sports, when ranking all time greats who are pretty equal in achievements, edge goes to the guy who is more talented (like KG > Dirk in basketball).

posted 9 months ago

i think loud is more successful, (champions > masters) and they win the H2H. I think they're more talented in that, I just straight up think theyre better and can beat more teams. Speaking about Prime LOUD vs Optic btw. Like in sports, when ranking all time greats who are pretty equal in achievements, edge goes to the guy who is more talented (like KG > Dirk in basketball).

posted 9 months ago

my takes r too controversial

posted 9 months ago

plz blow up this roster, i want to see leaf and xeppa succeed.

posted 9 months ago

these answers r messing w my peepee statistics

posted 9 months ago

me: 280 posts. who has the most likes/post aka best takes aka biggest peepee

posted 9 months ago

thats fair, i just think loud roster is more talented w/ equalish success

posted 9 months ago

I think LOUD > Optic, they won Champs which is more prestigious, and they are almost as consistent internationally. H2H they're kinda tied, but Optic had a big lead early on and LOUD caught up which means theyre more successful recently.

posted 9 months ago

ok we are both arguing on a forum about competitive valorant, and our egos are on the line. i think thats a loss for both of us

posted 9 months ago

ig this is a drop in the bucket of ur 10k posts

posted 9 months ago

how in the fuck is mako the main player, hes literally on smokes. he is definitely DRX's best player but they don't play around him

posted 9 months ago

witless npc response

posted 9 months ago

s0m is overrated, he is performing well on a middling NRG. him performing well =/= NRG winning. I think Marved is a lil overrated but when he was performing well, you could really see his impact on Optic w his clutches and lurk timings. s0m is like bradley beal putting up 26ppg on the wizards.

posted 9 months ago

says dexter with 9.7k posts. i can taste the cheeto crumbs on ur keyboard

posted 9 months ago

ur streak of me not knowing who u are continues. care to give a response or are u chill being an npc

posted 9 months ago

I still think he's the 2nd best controller after Mako, better than Pancada and s0m. Aside from Nats, he prob has the GOAT lurk timings. But maybe thats rose colored glasses. These are his stats since Reyjkjavic.

Reyjkavic: 1.13 - what solidified him as a top 10 player itw, iceman. Won MVP but still outperformed by yay tho imo
Copenhagen: 1.05 - considered a slight underperformance after Reykjavic
Champions: 0.99 - def an underperformance

Americas League: 1.01 - pretty good IGLing a shitty team
Americas LCQ: 0.87 - his worst performance in a long time

Idk seems like his legacy is carried by Reykjavic where I think Yay outperformed him tbh. Def in the top 20 best looking pros tho.

posted 9 months ago

are u actually asking?

  1. Weather - LA is sunny all the time, almost never rains, always blue clouds
  2. Diversity - LA has lots of poc's and ppl from diff backgrouds, Alabama is very openly racist, ppl in LA are also way more attractive
  3. Industry and job opportunity - LA has entertainment, tech, defense, etc, jobs there pay way better, universities there are way better
  4. Shit to do - clubs, bars, beaches

Is this a serious question bro. This is like comparing NYC to the Florida everglades

posted 9 months ago

my advice still stands

posted 9 months ago

franchising gonna be hella boring after a few years, I don't wanna watch NRG face C9 for the 369th time. I liked pre-franchising where any team could get to Masters and win. Competition and skill ceiling def increased tho.

posted 9 months ago

if there's no chemistry between u and her, just move on and raise ur standards. u can find someone else better suited and it will be better for both of u

posted 9 months ago

ive lived in LA and my brother lived in alabama for a bit. there is no comparison

posted 9 months ago

yall thinking about this list wrong. Some of these players like Chronicle, Leo, FNS, Saadhak, Cloud, etc are irreplaceable. Ppl like Klaus and Daveeys may deserve to be in franchising but are hella hella replaceable

posted 9 months ago

CHICHOO was godtier at Lock//In and Smoggy was super solid in Tokyo. EDG didn't get top 5-6 with just Kangkang. If it's just KK performing at Champs, then they get grouped.

posted 9 months ago

I made another thread about how kobe/ronaldo are r*pists but everyone seems to love them and ignore that fact, even tho ppl on vlr hate sinatraa + other people for the same shit. So there seems to be a point of fame where people can ignore that. I don't even know how I feel about it because I really respect Kobe, it was more of an open question. I just disrespect when people ask "who cares" in an open forum because it's literally an open forum

posted 9 months ago

I made another thread about how kobe/ronaldo are r*pists but everyone seems to love them and ignore that fact, even tho ppl on vlr hate sinatraa + other people for the same shit. So there seems to be a point of fame where people can ignore that. I don't even know how I feel about it because I really respect Kobe, it was more of an open question. I just really disrespect when people ask "who cares" in an open forum because it's an open forum.

posted 9 months ago

those two aren't mutually exclusive, it just means I didnt enjoy the movie

posted 9 months ago

well no response to the kobe/ronaldo thing, I guess you're just gonna tuck that away in the corner of your mind, which is fair bc everyone else does that

posted 9 months ago

not trying to glorify nuclear war, im saying nuclear war is so unfathomable and terrifying and the movie didnt convey that enough. I guess the book is boring too

posted 9 months ago

u are insane if u think Alabama is a nice place to live, especially compared to LA lmaoooo

posted 9 months ago

ya I agree that minimizes the importance of champs, masters is pretty much a feeding tournament into Champs which minimizes both tbh.

posted 9 months ago

u are just salty that I'm calling out kobe and ronaldo for being literal rapists, and u cant acknowledge or reconcile that fact. and I'm calling out the community for their inconsistency bc they hate sinatraa for the same reason. respond w ur opinion on this matter if u have actual takes instead of just saying who asked bruh

and I like your take that he discovered it the same as any other American citizen, I think that makes sense.

posted 9 months ago

a biopic about someone as impt as Oppenheimer should have been better imo. This movie has the same depth given to the biopic of the guy who started mcdonalds.

posted 9 months ago

I don't like movies that are summaries bc I can read those on wikipedia. I like movies that are visually stunning and that make me ask questions or challenge my beliefs, and this movie did none of that even if the acting is good or the cinematography is good. VERY MID and 3 hours is way too long for this midness

posted 9 months ago

because it's basically a summary. my first sentence of this post, is that I find movies w/out explosions very interesting which is why I pointed out that you didn't read my post.Tthis one just doesn't ask the right questions imo or push forward the right emotions. For me, nukes = existential terror, which this movie did not produce at all. It's very political, but it didn't even make me ask the question if it was good to be a communist at the time or no?

posted 9 months ago

did you really think this movie was interesting??? it's about him being trialed for maybe being a communist? thats so straightforward and uninteresting?? it doesn't even ask questions about if being a communist is right or not, it's just literally a trial about him being maybe a communist?? its just a biopic and I was so disappointed

posted 9 months ago

u didnt read my shit at all, I love good plot. I was just disappointed it wasn't about NUKES and how terrifying nuclear war is, it's actually literally about oppenheimers life which vs the implication of NUKES is super boring. its just a biopic and I was expecting way more. it's also 3 hours long

posted 9 months ago

and ya the nukes burning the atmosphere is terrifying, but its 100% theoretical and didn't happen. nukes are terrifying enough, show THAT goddamn

posted 9 months ago

and I love boring dialogue movies like Lost in Translation or 12 angry men

when I watch a movie about nuclear bombs, I want to feel terrified and absolutely small at the scale of destruction nukes could cause. oppenheimer did none of that, even tho oppenheimer the dude was saying it's a completely different world after he invented nukes, the movie showed none of that. I was so bored, it was all super straightforward boring politics, and they didn't even show the nukes landing on japan. I liked the scene where opp was giving his speech and he was pretending to be proud but he was guilty, but it doesnt replace a scene bombing Hiroshima or Nagasaki at all, they completely glossed over that shit like what??? Chernobyl the series is way better, and the prospect of nuclear war is way scarier in that show.

posted 9 months ago

Fnatic is the best of all time undisputed. There's 0 argument for NRG core, they won 1 masters.

posted 9 months ago

EG has a completely mickey mouse group, and I'll only consider their playoff performance. I consider NRG = Liquid and they only have to place top 2 in their group with fucking Bilibili gaming and Zeta who has been shit since Reykjavic. LOUD is definitely not a shoe-in for playoffs given they're in the group of death, and I dont know why you as an American feel any solidarity with them bc they're from South America.

Bc of franchising, NA ppl have started to group together themselves with South America bc tbh their teams are better (LOUD >> anyone, FURIA, LEV and KRU are very good). Don't be confused, you are two very different continents and there's 0 camaraderie between you two. You only group yourselves together to seem superior against EMEA which you aren't even and this is coming from an American.

posted 9 months ago

ya but france's quality of life is def better than alabama's. EU qol is better than US in general even tho gdp is higher, u have to look at purchasing power. in LA a sandwich is 15-20 bucks

posted 9 months ago

bro isn't even the 2nd best player on his team. Aspas/Derke/Kangkang hard clear, both at entrying and oping, and they can all play Raze. Demon1 just has prettier knives

posted 9 months ago

thats fair, but in that case, LOUD >= Optic > Navi. Optic is way more consistent than Navi but has equal achievements (1 masters). Loud has better achievements (1 champions) plus at their peak w Sacy and Pancada, I think their roster was just more talented than Optic's.

posted 9 months ago

i fucking live for this shit, i love arguing online while I'm drunk it gets me super aroused

posted 9 months ago
1 2 3 4 5 •• 7