I’ve read some braindead shit rn and if u think eu scene is more competitive than NA ur delusional asf.
I’ve read some braindead shit rn and if u think eu scene is more competitive than NA ur delusional asf.
If it's unprovable then you agree with the person who made the post
He said "if you think they're more competitive than NA ur delusional"
He didnt say "NA is more competitive than EU"
eu? the only eu I know is the ex-tier 2 team eunited that had players like "jmoh" or "scourge". I think you're getting confused here because eu is quite literally tier2 na
It literally is though. Eu challengers is arguably more competitive than masters lol.
I’m just saying eu wasn’t accurately represented at this masters. There will always be an asterisk on this masters.
but you didn't say that. you said that eu challengers was more competitive than masters when the two european teams that went full-strength to masters massively underperformed compared to their european results.
True. What I’m trying to say is without war and other shit, the competition and level of skill in eu is insane. It wasn’t shown properly at masters because of the many issues going on. Sure liquid and g2 didn’t perform as great but you can argue that those two teams were not supposed to be there and were not accurate representations of EU competition and skill.
Oh I'm sorry is that the gambit that lost to g2, or is it the fnatic that lost to g2
Oh no maybe it's fpx who lost to ldn utd and didn't win maps against other eu teams like loud did
Damn it’s almost like a fucked schedule, war and one loss define how good a team is!
here we go with vlr massively overrating EU again. daily reminder #2 G2 went out in 6th place at iceland.
G2 is not an accurate representation of what #2 eu is. M3C should’ve beat them but their schedule fucked them over.
g2 almost pushed FPX to a final map if they didn't throw on split, so I would say they are an accurate picture of a top EMEA team.
Eh, it’s debatable. Yay, Chet, and Aspas all said that when they scrimmed fpx and m3c that those teams were incredible. So I guess we will never know but from the gameplay I see, I would say eu is more competitive.
And if you think Na scene is equally competitive as Eu u Go touch grass
okay na is ten times better than eu if it makes you happy. enjoy your time at the top, you sen fans said the same thing after Iceland 2021 and we saw what happened afterwards, let's see how it goes this time.
the #1 NA team (optic) just slightly better than Team Liquid (only the 4th EMEA seed)
tbh, as a Liquid fan, i think if Liquid were in the grand finals instead of LOUD, we would've also gotten 3-0'd by OpTic
I do agree that emea TREMENDOUSLY underperformed at this LAN, I'd still say that they are the most competitive region out there but only by a little bit. NA, EMEA, BR and even APAC all have more than 1 team who could make a deep run at masters and imo, thats the way valorant should be. It shouldnt have just 1 dominant region who wins everything like in CSGO.
tbh whichever scene u support just seems more competitive for you. Personally i dont like watching NA and others probably think EU is tier 69 so there is no way to compare
Didnt heard anything like that since emea playoffs. And it was actually true. Fnc vs gmb was best game i ever watched.