-
Americas
-
EMEA
-
APAC
-
China
not true, apac is horrible outside of PRX and maybe nongshim if they lock in again
neither region is looking like champs winners and the average level is higher in EMEA
if you define good as "can win an international", then yeah i agree
the median team in EMEA is much better than the median team in APAC
the bottom 4 in EMEA are much better than the bottom 4 in APAC
the top end is now just PRX and they aren't good enough to justify putting the entire region above
good rn but they're not going to win an international, same story with say BBL in our region
can’t rank a one team region that high, and EMEA had a higher average placement than APAC in London sooooo yea
wow they beat PRX in EWC where they were experimenting, they are goated ig
NS also graped BBL in ewc anyways
Experimenting what? They played the same comps they always did and BBL are not very good
on average EMEA teams place better than pacific in internationals, and a mid tier EMEA is better than a mid tier APAC team, we saw FS vs FUT in london, just bc apac houses a top 3 team itw doesn’t automatically excuse the other 6+ shit teams it has
FS isnt the mid tier lol, they are currently the worst team in pacific.
Also, just wait until the korean teams get to champs.
Also if average placement matters more, does that mean China is better than EMEA? They placed better in both santiago and london
APAC>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EMEA
The mid table EMEA teams can't even beat tier 2 teams bro, they are not number 2