Where does alecks rank
1 or 2
between him or bonkar imo
not necessarily because of pedigree alone
but because they managed to deadlift the weight of the horrible dogshit callers on their team and cover it up with set strats and good reads
i think it is VERY impressive to have such a terrible caller and be such a good coach you carry them to an undefeated champs win and a podium at a masters
don't know why you're so upset about it
Calling is probably the most overrated skill unless you are consistently hitting free bombsites, and at that point it also for sure partly on the defense being bad rather than the attack side calling being good. Winning with a bad IGL is easier than winning with bad team fundamentals.
Bonkar also isn't really a strong macro strategic coach imo, he is more of a teamplay planner. NRG strength is undoubtedly team fundamentals and doing a lot of the basic things right.
They trade well, they play off each other well, the utility is well planned on execs, and they have strong communication across the board.
His reads aren't good either. Even if ethan was the worst caller of all time, if bonkar truly had good reads, ethan would be able to just follow the basic indicators bonkar points out to hit the understacked site every single time, which is not true at all.
Nah, David and Forsaken have pretty good calls and reads. Even jinggg does good mid-rounding
id say number 2 i think mini still 1 but if alecks wins london he will overtake mini and will be 1 for sure