Both games have been bangers and also super close which shows the level of competitiveness in the region and y'all will still call them bad all the while 100T vs G2 and LEV vs FUR were massacres
Both games have been bangers and also super close which shows the level of competitiveness in the region and y'all will still call them bad all the while 100T vs G2 and LEV vs FUR were massacres
The same region that won the most completive tourney to date in champs '25
....
when both the upper finals and lowers for qualifications are this close ( not to even mention FNC vs TH) it's gotta be a sign
once again
there's no point in being "competitive" regionally if they're not competitive internationally
no i used the results of the previous masters to come to that conclusion
emea looked oh so competitive in kickoff
and they got eliminated before china in santiago
by that logic pacific are the favourites and they're winning everything. literally only PRX and EDG/XLG are the same teams and the rest of them is new so why are we judging these teams based on completely unrelated performances of other teams
that's like saying GE/FS are tournament favourites because pacific did really good last tournament no?
its a sign everyone is leveled down. are you watching TH vs EF? this fracture was really bad specially the last few rounds
competitive ≠ good does not mean competitive = bad
it means that they are entirely separate from one another
if the region is bad internationally does it even matter how competitive they are within the region 😭
it's just like china lol, most competitive region internally but that doesn't mean shit in terms of how good they are comparatively to other regions
competitive ≠ good
FNATIC is still the best team in EMEA (just got unlucky with Veqaj situation)
China’s games are ridiculously close and yall call them dogshit, but when people do it to YOUR region you bitch and moan. EMEA is competitive because there is not a single good team in this region.