0

people calling EMEA bad

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
islaaa

Both games have been bangers and also super close which shows the level of competitiveness in the region and y'all will still call them bad all the while 100T vs G2 and LEV vs FUR were massacres

#2
shrike-
0
Frags
+

competitive ≠ good

#8
mustafais
-2
Frags
+

We saw how g2 performed in a uncompetitive americas last year

#11
shrike-
0
Frags
+

AMER was bad last year, what’s your point

#14
Mysticv1
0
Frags
+

in champs mibr, g2 and nrg did really good? exceeded their expectations except for g2

#19
shrike-
0
Frags
+

Up until champs americas was pretty bad

First time ever an americas team didn’t have a podium finish (in an NA event)

#15
Mqrio
0
Frags
+

The same region that won the most completive tourney to date in champs '25

....

#10
islaaa
0
Frags
+

so competitive= bad
not competitive= one team region
i see

#12
SENfns
0
Frags
+

competitive ≠ good
is not the same thing as competitive = bad

#18
islaaa
0
Frags
+

when both the upper finals and lowers for qualifications are this close ( not to even mention FNC vs TH) it's gotta be a sign

#20
SENfns
0
Frags
+

once again
there's no point in being "competitive" regionally if they're not competitive internationally

#21
islaaa
0
Frags
+

and you guessed that before masters even started wow you must be really good

#22
SENfns
0
Frags
+

no i used the results of the previous masters to come to that conclusion
emea looked oh so competitive in kickoff
and they got eliminated before china in santiago

#26
islaaa
0
Frags
+

by that logic pacific are the favourites and they're winning everything. literally only PRX and EDG/XLG are the same teams and the rest of them is new so why are we judging these teams based on completely unrelated performances of other teams

#27
SENfns
0
Frags
+

i guess bro

#28
islaaa
0
Frags
+

that's like saying GE/FS are tournament favourites because pacific did really good last tournament no?

#24
foythvlr
0
Frags
+

its a sign everyone is leveled down. are you watching TH vs EF? this fracture was really bad specially the last few rounds

#13
shrike-
0
Frags
+

competitive ≠ good does not mean competitive = bad

it means that they are entirely separate from one another

#17
Conceit
0
Frags
+

Playing good gameplay = good, it has nothing to do with competititveness

#25
islaaa
0
Frags
+

yeah okay good luck getting people to agree on a team having "good gameplay " in this site

#29
Conceit
0
Frags
+

Yeah no shit sherlock

#3
SENfns
0
Frags
+

if the region is bad internationally does it even matter how competitive they are within the region 😭

#9
MrBlooBloom
1
Frags
+

it's just like china lol, most competitive region internally but that doesn't mean shit in terms of how good they are comparatively to other regions

#4
GodAwfulGod
0
Frags
+

Competitiveness does not mean these teams are good

#5
Mysticv1
0
Frags
+

bro fnatic were 5-0 with subs

#16
faloxxl
0
Frags
+

babybay 30yo caster mogged NA..

#6
Marii
0
Frags
+

So they’re all equally shit is what you’re saying

#7
sentinelmain377
0
Frags
+

competitive ≠ good

FNATIC is still the best team in EMEA (just got unlucky with Veqaj situation)

#23
snowconedeity
0
Frags
+

China’s games are ridiculously close and yall call them dogshit, but when people do it to YOUR region you bitch and moan. EMEA is competitive because there is not a single good team in this region.

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment