5 ROOKIES KICKED THE NA'S FIRST SEED OUT OF TOURNAMENT
why would seeds not mean anything? there is a luck element/matchup involved but doesnt it mean they topped NA?
Honest to God, FURIA overperformed their expectations in Kick-Off. They played really well, but they definitely missed their win-con with an operator for Koalanoob. This series was very fun to watch still.
EMEA #1 and #2 seed in lower bracket while Americas #2 and #3 seed in upper bracket
dont you mean "emea 1 seed and na 1 seed go to elim match before any of the 2nd and 3rd seeds?"
5 ROOKIES, COMING FROM PREMIER, AGAINST LAST WORLD CHAMPIONS. DELUSIONAL
5 rookies got the EMEA first seed and kicked the NA first seed out of tournament? And they 5 rookies lost against last world champions? Try to respect bro. Grow up
i agree with you but argument-wise it is flawed, you're comparing seeds and then getting mad when someone calls out how the seeding doesn't actually mean anything when NRG as the 3rd seed beat BBL when FUR as the 1st seed couldn't. Still you are right in saying that it was great for BBL to push the last world champions this hard.
I didn't compare seeds. I said 5 Rookies kicked NA first seed. I didn't say EMEA first seed at the beginning. Read again and try to respect. Grow up guys
where in my whole post am i disrespecting BBL?
i apologize for misreading tho.
You are trying to manipulate what I said about BBL at the beginning. This is disrespectful