Is Kaajak the best player in the world rn?
Question
posted in
Valorant Discussion
idk, I feel like Kaajak's playmaking has been ridiculous recently. Alfa is definitely a close contender in my eyes
the sheer amount of rounds he's turned in FNC's favour and the multikill clips he hits prove enough to me
if you actually bothered to read my replies, you would know that im not making thsi concluson off of one or two series bum
Dude, you’re claiming he’s the best in the world when the community doesn’t even have him in their top 10.
Sure kaajak has better stats in stage 1. But alfajer has better stats in toronto. A stage with world class teams.
How are we putting kaajak over alfajer. A guy who has flexed for FNC, won two trophies, and proved himself as a mechanical demon on the world stage multiple times on 3 different iterations of the FNC roster. Kaajak is cracked but he’s not the best till he proves he’s the best.
Bum
because you're confusing best in the world (what im asking) with best of all time (not what i asked). kaajak also put up a very impressive performance in toronto, and performed better than alfajer in other recent events. besides, it isnt all stats either cause some impact cant be measured like that
I’m just gonna agree to disagree with you. Clearly we both have different ideas on what makes the best player in the world.
I don’t think anyone can be crowned the best in the world currently without results and achievements.
If Kaajak keeps this performance up (better than Alfa) and FNC wins champs? Then yes he’s going to the best in the world.
https://www.vlr.gg/498628/paper-rex-vs-fnatic-valorant-masters-toronto-2025-gf
Lmao. Vlr and recency biases are insane. Giving a crown to a trophyless player 🤣
bro putting that grand final doesnt prove anything. paper rex played far better as a team and deserved the win. im talking about individual recent performance, in which regards kaajak is better
What?
What is worth more:
GF against PRX in Masters Toronto
Group Match against KC and Melons
brother im not talking just about specific series, the guy has been dominant through stage 1, toronto and ewc, with a few bad games here and there. i dont see anyone else putting up his numbers
i mean how else are you supposed to judge a rookie without recency bias? just curious
Not really what i was asking but okay... let me rephrase. How can you determine if a rookie is good or bad without using recency bias?
Discord