But being a World Champion is a feeling that you will never experience.
0
You can win 3 Masters
posted in
Valorant Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
Being "THE FIRST VALORANT CHAMPION" is more special, the first page of the book is a historical moment.
Winning 3 masters is better then winning champions as masters is an INTERNATIONAL tournament so as Champions so you would experience the same feeling
Being a World Champion (VCT Champs Winner) is worth more than winning 3 Masters
Usually the rates is this winning 2 masters = champions
Winning 3 masters = champions + master
If you understand what i am saying is that there is 3 international tournaments 2 masters and 1 champions
Champions is equalvent to 2 masters as they will reach equal supply.
Thanks for the yap session and all, but equating 2 masters to a champs is stupid. Even more so 3 masters to a champs/masters.
You’re simply devaluing/inflating the worth of said trophies. 3 masters being the equal to a champs would be fair at best.
Acend as a whole fluked that trophy so at least choose comparable players. Lock/In doesn’t have the same worth as a masters/champions to add onto my point.
Explain 2 masters is the default in riot, and one champs is default so value wise it is 2 master - 1 champions
Mr. Yappington
You're equating 2 masters = 1 champs because riot holds 2 masters and 1 champs only? Seriously? Actual smooth brain
Alright let's just say this who is more valueable Chronicle who won berlin, sao paulo, and tokyo or BoneCold who won champs
So Sacy > Chronicle All time?
Chronicle won 2021 masters and 2023 masters which = Sacy's 2022 champs, and single elim lock in << Masters 2024
So Sacy > chronicle?
Why value champs so high when right before every champs there are always huge meta changes and a new map introduced into the pool
Good argument, the prize pool difference is pretty massive but that means we would have to start devaluing the first masters of the year when its prize pool is only 500k to the 1mil of the 2nd masters of the year.
The main problem comes from Riot doing a poor job of making the distinction between masters and champs in the first place back in 2021. Now all fans just naturally value both events as a major in their eyes since 2021. I think its still poorly advertised between the difference of the events. Champs just feels like its just marketing the champs bundle or whatever new agent or map they're releasing, and the hype from fans dont feel immensely different.
masters 1 should be less impressive than masters 2; 8 team event with a shorter qualification span allows flukes or teams without actual long standing skill to be better. (KC was able to make masters off really good set plays and comps) also the better teams aren't necessarily the teams that have outstanding play but rather teams that have gotten a stable base on the game before others. (NRG wasn't good but was able to pull through fine in kickoff due to being a team that already had chemistry between 2 groups of players.) Even a team like sentinels wasn't necessarily better at the time than any 2023 champs contender as much as they just had so many reps in and was simply ahead of other teams. The rule normally is either more teams = more prestigious (except for lock-in which had no qualification process) or later in the season = more prestigious
dude has never played real sports and it shows.
same reason the Olympics are valued more than any other international competition
I can't believe a couch potato who types on VLR is trying to tell another user they haven't played sports before😂😂😂
Most casual fans/normies do not care about or feel for the hype difference between masters and champs. Both events are just a marketing ploy for riot to promote skins, new maps, or new agents.
If Riot cared for the competitive integrity and prestige value between champs and masters. They wouldn't make so many questionable changes to schedules, formats, and huge meta-shifts in the middle of the season.
The Olympics is an event every 4 years to promote world peace and unity through a worldwide showcase of various sporting competitions with teams based on countries. Champs comes nowhere close to what the Olympics is trying to promote or is in principle.
BTW certain sports like soccer value the World Cup as a more prestigious and bigger event than the Olympics.
And there's no way you're trying to say that a masters in valorant is like the In Season Tournament in the NBA and champs in valorant equates to the NBA Finals
yes, that is what I am saying.
it's the END OF THE YEAR TOURNAMENT
you gain CHAMPIONS POINTS from the lower tier tournaments
just because you can't seem to see the difference between the two events doesn't mean there isn't one.
1 champ every year. it's the biggest tournament. period. end of story.
Champs event is 1.5 of masters MAXIMUM
Champs are not rly that much different from masters
Discord