2

big event won vs consistent qualifcation

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
tuxmko

would you win one big event (acend,gambit,sentinels) and go on a little downward spiral or have really consistent qualification in mostly all the vct majors with maybe only winning one big event or not (drx,kru,prx,optic,fnatic)
edit: i may gotten the teams to compare a bit mistaken but u get the question tho

#2
egg80085
13
Frags
+

bro no way you put optic in the same tier as drx, drx has not done shit, optic placed 1st, 2nd and 3rd at internationals

#3
tuxmko
4
Frags
+

bro u didnt answer the question :(

#4
zardinez
5
Frags
+

Consistent winning is the best ofc. Optic is the only team that's done that (2nd at berlin, 1st at iceland, 3rd at copenhagen). If FPX win champs, then they will be the best so far. This will all change during franchising tho.

#6
Kiklop
0
Frags
+

Consistently losing to emea teams>>>>>>
Sorry I had to :(

#12
zardinez
5
Frags
+

I mean yeah that too but they've still made it deep in 3 out of 4 major tournaments.

#15
Kiklop
0
Frags
+

I agree with u. just had to say that

#17
sheahhhh
0
Frags
+

u didnt have to say that as also Emea has never beaten loud

#5
arecyc
-1
Frags
+

how is optic consistent? they have one legitimate result which was at masters 2 when they got 2nd to gambit

#18
loseralex
2
Frags
+

2nd at berlin, 1st at master 1 this year, 3rd at copenhagen. has qualified for every insternation event besides masters iceland last year

#20
arecyc
0
Frags
+

masters 1 was non legitimate and at copenhagen they didnt beat any top 6 teams

#21
InXtiNct
0
Frags
+

They still make a deep run anyways, be it luck or not

#7
trola
6
Frags
+

i dont think optic belongs to that category. drx is one team region same as kru

#8
tuxmko
1
Frags
+

yeah i just put teams as a placeholder that usually almost always qualify so yeah, but i think there's better comparisons I'm just brain decay rn

#9
Kiklop
3
Frags
+

Winning event and staying t1 team. Just like OPTIC gambit acend (yes I still think acend is t1 team and that I would do well on international lan, maybe champs? 👀👀👀)

#10
Cresp
1
Frags
+

Pujan says acend is incredibly good still, emea is a hard region to get through

#13
Kiklop
0
Frags
+

Yep, and not only him.

#19
BoF7ooM
0
Frags
+

They were few rounds away from 2-0 ing FPX and knocking them out. M3C vs FPX was extremely close as well.

#11
meyournightmare
1
Frags
+

win one big event
what a team supposed to do by qualifying thousand times if they cant win shit (DRX,KRU)

#16
loeffelus187
1
Frags
+

winning a big event gives u more money than just qualifiyng so economically that would be better

#14
Targu1n
2
Frags
+

I think it depends on what region you're playing in; if you can manage to consistently qualify in EMEA that's SO much more valuable than winning a single event, because on average you will make it to a decently high ranking in the international event
For a small region like Japan on the other hand the run Zeta is invaluable because you now set the bar for future Japanese teams (and also prove that your region CAN do damage at international events and shouldn't be dismissed)

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment