TSM vs. BASILISK | Knights Monthly Gauntlet 2022: February | Playoffs | Valorant match

	R	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
corey TSM	1.36 1.49 1.26	298 381 236	22 12 10	/ 11 7 4 /	3 1 2	+11 +5 +6	86% 78% 92%	194 229 168	34% 26% 45%	4 1 3	0 0 0	+4 +1 +3
WARDELL TSM	1.28 0.88 1.58	245 100 355	18 3 15	/ 10 4 6 /	1 0 1	+8 -1 +9	71% 56% 83%	145 56 212	12% 0% 14%	2 0 2	3 2 1	-1 -2 +1
Rossy TSM	1.22 1.13 1.29	185 202 173	16 7 9	/ 9 6 3 /	1 0 1	+7 +1 +6	67% 56% 75%	118 132 106	26% 28% 24%	0 0 0	0 0 0	0 0 0
LeviathanAG TSM	0.92 1.15 0.75	166 156 174	11 5 6	/ 12 4 8 /	5 1 4	-1 +1 -2	76% 89% 67%	107 83 125	18% 33% 13%	3 2 1	2 0 2	+1 +2 -1
Subroza TSM	0.91 0.73 1.04	176 132 210	12 3 9	/ 16 7 9 /	6 3 3	-4 -4 0	76% 56% 92%	129 90 159	23% 31% 19%	4 1 3	3 3 0	+1 -2 +3

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

corey

TSM

1.36 1.49 1.26

298 381 236

22 12 10

/ 11 7 4 /

3 1 2

+11 +5 +6

86% 78% 92%

194 229 168

34% 26% 45%

4 1 3

0 0 0

+4 +1 +3

WARDELL

TSM

1.28 0.88 1.58

245 100 355

18 3 15

/ 10 4 6 /

1 0 1

+8 -1 +9

71% 56% 83%

145 56 212

12% 0% 14%

2 0 2

3 2 1

-1 -2 +1

Rossy

TSM

1.22 1.13 1.29

185 202 173

16 7 9

/ 9 6 3 /

1 0 1

+7 +1 +6

67% 56% 75%

118 132 106

26% 28% 24%

0 0 0

LeviathanAG

TSM

0.92 1.15 0.75

166 156 174

11 5 6

/ 12 4 8 /

5 1 4

-1 +1 -2

76% 89% 67%

107 83 125

18% 33% 13%

3 2 1

2 0 2

+1 +2 -1

Subroza

TSM

0.91 0.73 1.04

176 132 210

12 3 9

/ 16 7 9 /

6 3 3

-4 -4 0

76% 56% 92%

129 90 159

23% 31% 19%

4 1 3

3 3 0

+1 -2 +3

	R	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
duck AI	1.02 1.27 0.68	181 249 90	14 11 3	/ 14 9 5 /	1 1 0	0 +2 -2	57% 58% 56%	109 148 58	37% 31% 67%	5 3 2	1 0 1	+4 +3 +1
Nanners AI	1.01 0.95 1.08	247 220 283	16 8 8	/ 16 9 7 /	6 5 1	0 -1 +1	67% 67% 67%	169 157 185	17% 18% 17%	2 0 2	6 5 1	-4 -5 +1
ohai AI	0.83 0.83 0.83	180 141 232	12 5 7	/ 17 10 7 /	4 3 1	-5 -5 0	57% 58% 56%	118 99 145	22% 20% 23%	1 0 1	1 0 1	0 0 0
royal AI	0.67 0.65 0.70	133 146 118	11 7 4	/ 16 10 6 /	4 1 3	-5 -3 -2	62% 67% 56%	82 82 83	36% 33% 40%	0 0 0	2 1 1	-2 -1 -1
eVoL AI	0.49 0.10 1.00	57 28 95	5 1 4	/ 16 11 5 /	2 0 2	-11 -10 -1	33% 17% 56%	29 17 44	40% 50% 38%	0 0 0	3 3 0	-3 -3 0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

duck

1.02 1.27 0.68

181 249 90

14 11 3

/ 14 9 5 /

1 1 0

0 +2 -2

57% 58% 56%

109 148 58

37% 31% 67%

5 3 2

1 0 1

+4 +3 +1

Nanners

1.01 0.95 1.08

247 220 283

16 8 8

/ 16 9 7 /

6 5 1

0 -1 +1

67% 67% 67%

169 157 185

17% 18% 17%

2 0 2

6 5 1

-4 -5 +1

ohai

0.83 0.83 0.83

180 141 232

12 5 7

/ 17 10 7 /

4 3 1

-5 -5 0

57% 58% 56%

118 99 145

22% 20% 23%

1 0 1

0 0 0

royal

0.67 0.65 0.70

133 146 118

11 7 4

/ 16 10 6 /

4 1 3

-5 -3 -2

62% 67% 56%

82 82 83

36% 33% 40%

0 0 0

2 1 1

-2 -1 -1

eVoL

0.49 0.10 1.00

57 28 95

5 1 4

/ 16 11 5 /

2 0 2

-11 -10 -1

33% 17% 56%

29 17 44

40% 50% 38%

0 0 0

3 3 0

-3 -3 0

	R	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
WARDELL TSM	1.68 1.42 2.19	333 275 377	41 22 19	/ 15 9 6 /	3 2 1	+26 +13 +13	83% 81% 86%	188 168 218	14% 8% 18%	5 2 3	3 2 1	+2 0 +2
LeviathanAG TSM	1.33 1.41 1.40	252 252 209	29 20 9	/ 18 9 9 /	11 6 5	+11 +11 0	86% 95% 71%	145 144 146	22% 26% 18%	6 4 2	2 0 2	+4 +4 0
corey TSM	1.30 1.41 0.98	303 359 218	38 27 11	/ 21 16 5 /	7 5 2	+17 +11 +6	83% 81% 86%	206 240 155	33% 28% 48%	6 3 3	3 3 0	+3 0 +3
Rossy TSM	1.08 0.97 1.51	157 151 181	22 11 11	/ 17 14 3 /	16 15 1	+5 -3 +8	77% 76% 79%	100 92 111	25% 26% 24%	0 0 0	0 0 0	0 0 0
Subroza TSM	0.77 0.66 0.98	150 140 180	19 10 9	/ 23 14 9 /	8 5 3	-4 -4 0	74% 62% 93%	107 87 136	22% 25% 19%	5 2 3	5 5 0	0 -3 +3

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

WARDELL

TSM

1.68 1.42 2.19

333 275 377

41 22 19

/ 15 9 6 /

3 2 1

+26 +13 +13

83% 81% 86%

188 168 218

14% 8% 18%

5 2 3

3 2 1

+2 0 +2

LeviathanAG

TSM

1.33 1.41 1.40

252 252 209

29 20 9

/ 18 9 9 /

11 6 5

+11 +11 0

86% 95% 71%

145 144 146

22% 26% 18%

6 4 2

2 0 2

+4 +4 0

corey

TSM

1.30 1.41 0.98

303 359 218

38 27 11

/ 21 16 5 /

7 5 2

+17 +11 +6

83% 81% 86%

206 240 155

33% 28% 48%

6 3 3

3 3 0

+3 0 +3

Rossy

TSM

1.08 0.97 1.51

157 151 181

22 11 11

/ 17 14 3 /

16 15 1

+5 -3 +8

77% 76% 79%

100 92 111

25% 26% 24%

0 0 0

Subroza

TSM

0.77 0.66 0.98

150 140 180

19 10 9

/ 23 14 9 /

8 5 3

-4 -4 0

74% 62% 93%

107 87 136

22% 25% 19%

5 2 3

5 5 0

0 -3 +3

	R	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Nanners AI	1.00 0.50 1.11	262 198 299	27 8 19	/ 29 11 18 /	7 5 2	-2 -3 +1	69% 57% 76%	175 145 195	22% 17% 25%	3 0 3	9 6 3	-6 -6 0
ohai AI	0.89 0.99 0.87	207 158 231	23 7 16	/ 31 12 19 /	6 3 3	-8 -5 -3	60% 64% 57%	132 110 147	23% 30% 20%	3 0 3	2 0 2	+1 0 +1
duck AI	0.66 0.65 0.51	136 218 96	18 11 7	/ 29 11 18 /	2 1 1	-11 0 -11	54% 57% 52%	87 131 58	40% 30% 55%	5 3 2	4 1 3	+1 +2 -1
eVoL AI	0.58 0.06 0.92	90 24 123	11 1 10	/ 29 13 16 /	4 0 4	-18 -12 -6	43% 14% 62%	49 14 72	39% 50% 38%	1 0 1	4 3 1	-3 -3 0
royal AI	0.48 0.33 0.54	119 125 120	15 7 8	/ 31 12 19 /	6 1 5	-16 -5 -11	51% 57% 48%	77 70 82	45% 33% 56%	1 0 1	3 1 2	-2 -1 -1

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Nanners

1.00 0.50 1.11

262 198 299

27 8 19

/ 29 11 18 /

7 5 2

-2 -3 +1

69% 57% 76%

175 145 195

22% 17% 25%

3 0 3

9 6 3

-6 -6 0

ohai

0.89 0.99 0.87

207 158 231

23 7 16

/ 31 12 19 /

6 3 3

-8 -5 -3

60% 64% 57%

132 110 147

23% 30% 20%

3 0 3

2 0 2

+1 0 +1

duck

0.66 0.65 0.51

136 218 96

18 11 7

/ 29 11 18 /

2 1 1

-11 0 -11

54% 57% 52%

87 131 58

40% 30% 55%

5 3 2

4 1 3

+1 +2 -1

eVoL

0.58 0.06 0.92

90 24 123

11 1 10

/ 29 13 16 /

4 0 4

-18 -12 -6

43% 14% 62%

49 14 72

39% 50% 38%

1 0 1

4 3 1

-3 -3 0

royal

0.48 0.33 0.54

119 125 120

15 7 8

/ 31 12 19 /

6 1 5

-16 -5 -11

51% 57% 48%

77 70 82

45% 33% 56%

1 0 1

3 1 2

-2 -1 -1

	R	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
WARDELL TSM	2.09 1.97 2.80	421 406 511	23 19 4	/ 5 5 0 /	2 2 0	+18 +14 +4	100% 100% 100%	252 252 251	15% 9% 25%	3 2 1	0 0 0	+3 +2 +1
LeviathanAG TSM	1.73 1.68 2.05	338 325 418	18 15 3	/ 6 5 1 /	6 5 1	+12 +10 +2	100% 100% 100%	201 190 269	26% 24% 38%	3 2 1	0 0 0	+3 +2 +1
corey TSM	1.25 1.34 0.70	308 342 109	16 15 1	/ 10 9 1 /	4 4 0	+6 +6 0	79% 83% 50%	223 248 77	33% 30% 67%	2 2 0	3 3 0	-1 -1 0
Rossy TSM	0.94 0.81 1.73	128 113 228	6 4 2	/ 8 8 0 /	15 15 0	-2 -4 +2	93% 92% 100%	73 62 140	25% 25% 25%	0 0 0	0 0 0	0 0 0
Subroza TSM	0.63 0.58 0.91	124 146	7 7 0	/ 7 7 0 /	2 2 0	0 0	71% 67% 100%	73 85	20% 20%	1 1 0	2 2 0	-1 -1 0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

WARDELL

TSM

2.09 1.97 2.80

421 406 511

23 19 4

/ 5 5 0 /

2 2 0

+18 +14 +4

100% 100% 100%

252 252 251

15% 9% 25%

3 2 1

0 0 0

+3 +2 +1

LeviathanAG

TSM

1.73 1.68 2.05

338 325 418

18 15 3

/ 6 5 1 /

6 5 1

+12 +10 +2

100% 100% 100%

201 190 269

26% 24% 38%

3 2 1

0 0 0

+3 +2 +1

corey

TSM

1.25 1.34 0.70

308 342 109

16 15 1

/ 10 9 1 /

4 4 0

+6 +6 0

79% 83% 50%

223 248 77

33% 30% 67%

2 2 0

3 3 0

-1 -1 0

Rossy

TSM

0.94 0.81 1.73

128 113 228

6 4 2

/ 8 8 0 /

15 15 0

-2 -4 +2

93% 92% 100%

73 62 140

25% 25% 25%

0 0 0

Subroza

TSM

0.63 0.58 0.91

124 146

7 7 0

/ 7 7 0 /

2 2 0

0 0

71% 67% 100%

73 85

20% 20%

1 1 0

2 2 0

-1 -1 0

	R	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Nanners AI	0.99 0.06 1.15	276 71 311	11 0 11	/ 13 2 11 /	1 0 1	-2 -2 0	71% 0% 83%	184 71 203	29% 0% 30%	1 0 1	3 1 2	-2 -1 -1
ohai AI	0.95 1.15 0.92	234 263 230	11 2 9	/ 14 2 12 /	2 0 2	-3 0 -3	64% 100% 58%	153 179 148	24% 100% 17%	2 0 2	1 0 1	+1 0 +1
eVoL AI	0.68 0.01 0.83	123 0 144	6 0 6	/ 13 2 11 /	2 0 2	-7 -2 -5	57% 0% 67%	79 0 93	38% 38%	1 0 1	1 0 1	0 0 0
duck AI	0.30 0.04 0.34	90 27 101	4 0 4	/ 15 2 13 /	1 0 1	-11 -2 -9	50% 50% 50%	54 27 58	47% 0% 50%	0 0 0	3 1 2	-3 -1 -2
royal AI	0.29 0.01 0.38	104 0 122	4 0 4	/ 15 2 13 /	2 0 2	-11 -2 -9	36% 0% 42%	69 0 81	75% 75%	1 0 1	1 0 1	0 0 0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Nanners

0.99 0.06 1.15

276 71 311

11 0 11

/ 13 2 11 /

1 0 1

-2 -2 0

71% 0% 83%

184 71 203

29% 0% 30%

1 0 1

3 1 2

-2 -1 -1

ohai

0.95 1.15 0.92

234 263 230

11 2 9

/ 14 2 12 /

2 0 2

-3 0 -3

64% 100% 58%

153 179 148

24% 100% 17%

2 0 2

1 0 1

+1 0 +1

eVoL

0.68 0.01 0.83

123 0 144

6 0 6

/ 13 2 11 /

2 0 2

-7 -2 -5

57% 0% 67%

79 0 93

38% 38%

1 0 1

0 0 0

duck

0.30 0.04 0.34

90 27 101

4 0 4

/ 15 2 13 /

1 0 1

-11 -2 -9

50% 50% 50%

54 27 58

47% 0% 50%

0 0 0

3 1 2

-3 -1 -2

royal

0.29 0.01 0.38

104 0 122

4 0 4

/ 15 2 13 /

2 0 2

-11 -2 -9

36% 0% 42%

69 0 81

75% 75%

1 0 1

0 0 0

AhsanX

Frags

–

TSM 2-0

no1haterbutloveyou2

-1

Frags

–

TBD 2-0 TBD

idiotbasket

-1

Frags

–

2-1 tsm unless roza igls

Crayzid

Frags

–

#TSMWIN

S0v4k

Frags

–

TSM 2-0
I believe in the power

thatpower

Frags

–

team basilisk 2-1 big upset

cyAnoZen

Frags

–

Team SoloMid vs Team Basilisk....noice!

juno_VLR

Frags

–

why predict 2-1 when tsm destroyed them 2-0 in VCT...
this is actually the easiest quarterfinal matchup in the tourney

MalayAyachit

Frags

–

lesgo ROZA igl should be ez for team so mid until wardell has a bad op day

#10

2323232dddd

Frags

–

TSM(Aka Team Streamer Mid) will win these games 13-0 and 13-0, surely they win!, I heckin love wardell!

#11

frappzlul

Frags

–

TSM already fought these fellas and they fuckin suck gg 2-0 in tsm's favor

#12

sh1nj1

Frags

–

ballsack 2-1

#13

Tzuyu

Frags

–

TSM 2-0 Rossy and Wardaddy shut it down like usual.

#14

Ryker

Frags

–

tsm won??

#15

Rimuru_T

-1

Frags

–

how is aleko still on the team WTF

#16

CalypsoGHC

Frags

–

Rimuru_T [#15]

how is aleko still on the team WTF

shush hater

#17

NA_KEKW

Frags

–

Rimuru_T [#15]

how is aleko still on the team WTF

lmao literally every post i've seen of you is just on how bad aleko is, stats aren't everything, im pretty sure aleko is the igl for the team

#18

Rimuru_T

Frags

–

NA_KEKW [#17]

lmao literally every post i've seen of you is just on how bad aleko is, stats aren't everything, im pretty sure aleko is the igl for the team

no it isnt, subroza is the igl, btw im not looking at stats, literally watched every game

#19

juno_VLR

Frags

–

NA_KEKW [#17]

lmao literally every post i've seen of you is just on how bad aleko is, stats aren't everything, im pretty sure aleko is the igl for the team

a) no it's subroza, used to be rossy.
b) aleko is a great sova, questionable viper only because he takes a TON of risks in first duels. sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesn't. luckily playstyle can be learned, and his aim is decent enough. i personally think he's the weak link, especially on viper, but he has a lot of impact that I can't see as a mere viewer.

#20

dapoorv

Frags

–

NA_KEKW [#17]

lmao literally every post i've seen of you is just on how bad aleko is, stats aren't everything, im pretty sure aleko is the igl for the team

No subroza is the igl. I don't know about the mid round calls etc. Also his sova is pretty good, just needs to work on his viper a bit.

#21

juno_VLR

Frags

–

dapoorv [#20]

No subroza is the igl. I don't know about the mid round calls etc. Also his sova is pretty good, just needs to work on his viper a bit.

yes, that's the common/correct view on him. tsm doesn't NEED him to take so many first duels, but sometimes it works and is super helpful. but when it doesn't work... high impact.

#22

lMikeyl

Frags

–

cyAnoZen [#7]

Team SoloMid vs Team Basilisk....noice!

cuse teams now know our weakest map which is bind and ascent. but we pulled through so its all g

#23

Rimuru_T

Frags

–

juno_VLR [#19]

a) no it's subroza, used to be rossy.
b) aleko is a great sova, questionable viper only because he takes a TON of risks in first duels. sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesn't. luckily playstyle can be learned, and his aim is decent enough. i personally think he's the weak link, especially on viper, but he has a lot of impact that I can't see as a mere viewer.

tbh it doesnt work most of the times, he loses most of his aim duels/first duels which the team has to play 4v5 a lot of the times