hot take

as an ascendant player, i really dont get why ppl keep saying like anything imm3 and below is low elo and only radiant is high elo. I think people forgot the definition of low, mid, and high elo. IMO I think low elo would be the bottom 40%, mid elo would be 40-70% and high elo would be the top 30%. If we follow this logic, then low elo would be iron 1-silver 1, mid elo would be silver 1- gold 2-3, and anything aboce that is high elo. Reminder that "mid" elo is just the average playerbase, and just because ur radiant does not make everyone who is not as good as you low elo. Saying 99.95% of the playerbase is low elo is just stastically wrong.

As a man, why are u not atleast immortal

low elo - iron, bronze, silver
mid- gold, plat, diamond
high- asc, immo, radiant

you could argue asc to mid elo and just immortal and radiant is high but i like this distribution.

mfs do not know low elo until they go spectate their teammates in a bronze 1 lobby and see people move their mouse like aimlabs while spraying

people are constantly grinding, especially the young ones. there are a lot of talented people in asc lobbies. (i know cause they shave heads)

grinders will eventually get to immortal and radiant. i believe there are only good and bad players. and i am the bestest