Map veto doesn't mean shit

in a Grand Finals

Whoever shows the fuck up will win the series easy as that.

(Gambit v Envy: Gambit won on their permaban of Haven -> 3-0 win)

(Optic beat Loud on Ascent -> Loud's first ever loss on Ascent -> resulting in a 3-0 loss with Loud having the 2 bans)

(Paper Rex v FPX respectively lost both their map picks in Copenhagen)

(EG was about to beat Fnatic on their permaban of Bind as well 12-7 -> lost 12-14 in the end)

Who can guarantee me that EG will win Fracture against any of these teams in the grand finals?
Not a single one of you and if they happen to lose on Fracture their advantage will be down the drain already

All teams left in the tournament are cracked on at least 5/7 maps end of story.

Yeah I mean if DRX was able to get 9 rounds in Fracture, with shit performance that day, any team can do it. Then there's DRX 13-1 FNC in their map pick too.

How about the fact the in Tokyo fnatic banned 2 of egs best maps pearl and fracture that give them huge advantage.
You are right fron one perspective but on fracture it is very tough to beat eg even if you outaim them there strats are just better that's why map veto so important.
Map veto is important but valorant is an fps and you shoudn't go too deep into map vetos as they give you maybe a 0.5 percentage advantage Map veto is often overlooked

kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk ok

ngl if fpx didn't go to lower bracket in copenhagen it would be 3-0 for them
their ascent and split were really dominant

bro watched fnatic shit their ass out on Bind and says map veto doesn't matter

True clearly Fnatic are winning this

so true eg is winning it all

spitting facts

Yeah true, but at the same time replay that series between, FNC and EG, but EG gets the bans, and tell me FNC 3-0's again. FNC doesn't have Lotusl, is forced to play Pearl, and EG has fracture, that swing is crazy.

Don't tell this person that anti-stratting exists it will blow their mind