Azplicueta vs Laporte, Chelsea mci
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.19 1.34 0.33 | 310 352 60 | 13 13 0 | / 14 12 2 / | 6 2 4 | -1 +1 -2 | 71% 75% 50% | 200 224 60 | 16% 15% 33% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.92 0.62 2.68 | 204 149 532 | 9 5 4 | / 13 13 0 / | 4 3 1 | -4 -8 +4 | 64% 58% 100% | 124 97 283 | 36% 64% 18% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.29 0.20 0.84 | 76 72 100 | 3 2 1 | / 14 12 2 / | 6 5 1 | -11 -10 -1 | 57% 58% 50% | 45 43 56 | 13% 8% 33% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.07 0.16 0.01 | 69 81 | 2 2 0 | / 14 12 2 / | 3 3 0 | -12 -10 -2 | 29% 33% | 49 57 | 27% 27% | 0 0 0 | 4 3 1 | -4 -3 -1 | |
|
0.04 0.02 0.91 | 58 42 157 | 2 1 1 | / 14 12 2 / | 0 0 0 | -12 -11 -1 | 29% 17% 100% | 44 34 99 | 10% 0% 50% | 1 0 1 | 7 7 0 | -6 -7 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2.31 1.17 2.50 | 399 263 423 | 22 2 20 | / 5 1 4 / | 11 0 11 | +17 +1 +16 | 100% 100% 100% | 264 156 282 | 29% 18% 31% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.55 1.22 1.60 | 346 425 333 | 17 3 14 | / 8 3 5 / | 6 0 6 | +9 0 +9 | 79% 50% 83% | 211 211 212 | 14% 30% 9% | 7 1 6 | 1 1 0 | +6 0 +6 | |
|
1.46 0.73 1.59 | 231 120 250 | 12 1 11 | / 6 1 5 / | 12 1 11 | +6 0 +6 | 93% 100% 92% | 152 101 161 | 15% 14% 15% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.23 1.50 1.19 | 190 312 171 | 11 3 8 | / 5 2 3 / | 2 0 2 | +6 +1 +5 | 93% 100% 92% | 132 212 119 | 44% 80% 38% | 3 0 3 | 0 0 0 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
1.09 0.36 1.21 | 152 72 167 | 7 0 7 | / 5 1 4 / | 6 1 5 | +2 -1 +3 | 100% 100% 100% | 125 72 133 | 33% 20% 37% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.34 0.33 1.19 | 310 352 60 | 13 13 0 | / 14 12 2 / | 6 2 4 | -1 +1 -2 | 71% 75% 50% | 200 224 60 | 16% 15% 33% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.62 2.68 0.92 | 204 149 532 | 9 5 4 | / 13 13 0 / | 4 3 1 | -4 -8 +4 | 64% 58% 100% | 124 97 283 | 36% 64% 18% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.20 0.84 0.29 | 76 72 100 | 3 2 1 | / 14 12 2 / | 6 5 1 | -11 -10 -1 | 57% 58% 50% | 45 43 56 | 13% 8% 33% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.16 0.01 0.07 | 69 81 | 2 2 0 | / 14 12 2 / | 3 3 0 | -12 -10 -2 | 29% 33% | 49 57 | 27% 27% | 0 0 0 | 4 3 1 | -4 -3 -1 | |
|
0.02 0.91 0.04 | 58 42 157 | 2 1 1 | / 14 12 2 / | 0 0 0 | -12 -11 -1 | 29% 17% 100% | 44 34 99 | 10% 0% 50% | 1 0 1 | 7 7 0 | -6 -7 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.17 2.50 2.31 | 399 263 423 | 22 2 20 | / 5 1 4 / | 11 0 11 | +17 +1 +16 | 100% 100% 100% | 264 156 282 | 29% 18% 31% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.22 1.60 1.55 | 346 425 333 | 17 3 14 | / 8 3 5 / | 6 0 6 | +9 0 +9 | 79% 50% 83% | 211 211 212 | 14% 30% 9% | 7 1 6 | 1 1 0 | +6 0 +6 | |
|
0.73 1.59 1.46 | 231 120 250 | 12 1 11 | / 6 1 5 / | 12 1 11 | +6 0 +6 | 93% 100% 92% | 152 101 161 | 15% 14% 15% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.50 1.19 1.23 | 190 312 171 | 11 3 8 | / 5 2 3 / | 2 0 2 | +6 +1 +5 | 93% 100% 92% | 132 212 119 | 44% 80% 38% | 3 0 3 | 0 0 0 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
0.36 1.21 1.09 | 152 72 167 | 7 0 7 | / 5 1 4 / | 6 1 5 | +2 -1 +3 | 100% 100% 100% | 125 72 133 | 33% 20% 37% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 |
what an absurd...
so many good orgless teams and FA players but these tier4 players with tiktok star coach getting opportunities.
how an organization can find this profitable or even worth the investment? just stealing other people opportunities.
Maybe I'm too harsh on the players, I'm sure they have potential in the long run, but its clear to see its way to early for them to play in a professional league against developed teams/players, what a shame...