Have to be the top 5 teams this year, uncontested.
If you go a little down we have Fnatic and such. But these 5 have to be at the top...
Agreed, everyone?
15
OPTIC, DRX, LOUD, FPX AND PRX
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
teilwal [#4]prx might be up for debate because of recent placement but the others 100%
wdym PRX were top 4 in Iceland too
teilwal [#4]prx might be up for debate because of recent placement but the others 100%
PRX’s years is still better than DRX unless DRX wins tomorrow
Mortadelo [#9]PRX’s years is still better than DRX unless DRX wins tomorrow
top 3 champs >>> top 2 copenhagen
Mortadelo [#9]PRX’s years is still better than DRX unless DRX wins tomorrow
idk bro drx is still undefeated against prx
im looking forward to their next rematch
thatpower [#10]top 3 champs >>> top 2 copenhagen
I don’t really think it’s harder to win a Champions than a Masters event tbh. But Ig yeah if you wanna count it like that
WOWMAN [#7]wdym PRX were top 4 in Iceland too
i was going to say fnatic were pretty consistent in placement but then realised that they didnt get out of groups at Iceland mb you are right
Mortadelo [#9]PRX’s years is still better than DRX unless DRX wins tomorrow
PRX did have playoff bracket buff tho to be fair.
Skaydi [#11]idk bro drx is still undefeated against prx
im looking forward to their next rematch
Bad news for you dude, doubt there’s one, hardly doubt we’ll ever see PRX roster together like that again because of franchising.
Still, comparing achievements not team level Ig
Mortadelo [#12]I don’t really think it’s harder to win a Champions than a Masters event tbh. But Ig yeah if you wanna count it like that
PRX not getting out of the worst group doesn’t help them
Mortadelo [#16]Explain tho
PRX iceland:
Lost 2, won 2 (lost to drx and 3rd place)
DRX iceland:
Lost 2, won 3 (also lost to eventual winners and 3rd place)
PRX Copenhagen:
Lost 1, won 3 (lost to eventual winners)
DRX Copenhagen:
Lost 2, won 3 (lost to eventual winners after beating them in groups, lost to 3rd place)
PRX Champions:
Lost 2, won 1 (Lost to LEV and TL, both went 0-2 in playoffs)
DRX Champions:
Lost 1, won 5 (lost to Grand Finalists LOUD)
DRX achieved similar/better results with more games played (fighting through groups all 3 tournaments)
Mortadelo [#12]I don’t really think it’s harder to win a Champions than a Masters event tbh. But Ig yeah if you wanna count it like that
prx started in playoffs at masters too, which is a big advantage and doesn’t test their abilities as much, whereas drx always fought their way out of groups.
archetype [#19]PRX iceland:
Lost 2, won 2 (lost to drx and 3rd place)
DRX iceland:
Lost 2, won 3 (also lost to eventual winners and 3rd place)PRX Copenhagen:
Lost 1, won 3 (lost to eventual winners)
DRX Copenhagen:
Lost 2, won 3 (lost to eventual winners after beating them in groups, lost to 3rd place)PRX Champions:
Lost 2, won 1 (Lost to LEV and TL, both went 0-2 in playoffs)
DRX Champions:
Lost 1, won 5 (lost to Grand Finalists LOUD)DRX achieved similar/better results with more games played (fighting through groups all 3 tournaments)
commenting in order to copy paste this at will
h9zard [#2]agreed
6-10 for the year in no order: fnc xset Levi tl, gld/zeta
11-15 for the year in no order: gld/zeta, g2 guard kru xia
16-21 (no order) (the rest): nth edg boom fur nip 100t
Teams that are top 10 not at lan tho: m3c (the lan m3c)
Tell me if I forgot something or there is something u don't agree with
archetype [#19]PRX iceland:
Lost 2, won 2 (lost to drx and 3rd place)
DRX iceland:
Lost 2, won 3 (also lost to eventual winners and 3rd place)PRX Copenhagen:
Lost 1, won 3 (lost to eventual winners)
DRX Copenhagen:
Lost 2, won 3 (lost to eventual winners after beating them in groups, lost to 3rd place)PRX Champions:
Lost 2, won 1 (Lost to LEV and TL, both went 0-2 in playoffs)
DRX Champions:
Lost 1, won 5 (lost to Grand Finalists LOUD)DRX achieved similar/better results with more games played (fighting through groups all 3 tournaments)
"eventual winners"
You mean fpx with subs?
luckypleb [#26]"eventual winners"
You mean fpx with subs?
It's a different situation than Fnatic at Iceland - SEIDER had already been practicing with FPX as they were preparing for the likely scenario of one+ original players not being able to play for Groups.
But either way, PRX and DRX both lost to the eventual winners. There's little to no difference if you revise my original statement. PRX are still an insane team. I just think they benefitted from being seeded into playoffs.
luckypleb [#22]There must be a team more consistent than fpx right? Let's not assume they should have win iceland or something
Where did I assume they would have won Iceland? Their Copenhagen win and 4th in Champions is enough for the top 5.
SigmaMale [#24]Prx? They had 2nd place and 4th place
Is that not enough? Who would u put other than PRX in the top 5?
sentinelmain377 [#25]6-10 for the year in no order: fnc xset Levi tl, gld/zeta
11-15 for the year in no order: gld/zeta, g2 guard kru xia16-21 (no order) (the rest): nth edg boom fur nip 100t
Teams that are top 10 not at lan tho: m3c (the lan m3c)
Tell me if I forgot something or there is something u don't agree with
Yea, I agree with most of it, nice,
archetype [#19]PRX iceland:
Lost 2, won 2 (lost to drx and 3rd place)
DRX iceland:
Lost 2, won 3 (also lost to eventual winners and 3rd place)PRX Copenhagen:
Lost 1, won 3 (lost to eventual winners)
DRX Copenhagen:
Lost 2, won 3 (lost to eventual winners after beating them in groups, lost to 3rd place)PRX Champions:
Lost 2, won 1 (Lost to LEV and TL, both went 0-2 in playoffs)
DRX Champions:
Lost 1, won 5 (lost to Grand Finalists LOUD)DRX achieved similar/better results with more games played (fighting through groups all 3 tournaments)
I guess it really depends on what you give more value to, if the path to get there or the results, but fair enough dude, you’re right
Mortadelo [#12]I don’t really think it’s harder to win a Champions than a Masters event tbh. But Ig yeah if you wanna count it like that
There is no bye to playoffs + more teams + other regions have time to do a bootcamp. Also the most consisted teams from all regions get a spot at Champions (circuit points)
luckypleb [#22]There must be a team more consistent than fpx right? Let's not assume they should have win iceland or something
Iceland 8th(1st emea seed)
Copenhagen winner
And champion top 4th
I dont see any teams except from this list are better than fpx
Discord