change derke with alfa, enzo or boaster
derke not top 10 , he clearly underpeformed
cryo or zekken played better and won their team a map
this? this chicanery?
Mindfreak is underrated, but I still don't think he's better than Marved or maybe even MaKo
dogshit list, this is not a worlds best player rankings, this is just a recency biased list of this tournament best performers, derke for example might have underperformed but he is still better than that, why do we do this in valorant? imagine s1mple or zywoo have a bad tournament and suddenly they wouldnt be top10 players itw according to valorant fans logic?
Chronicle, nAts, cNed, nukkye, ScreaM, TenZ, leaf would all be in Top 10 contention if they were in this LAN
of course theres a recency bias. its not based on how well they played 8 years ago its based on how well they play right now
they are still playing well regionally, then by your logic its a best performers from this tournament list not a best players in the world list
But it hasn't been 8 years since they played has it? You don't go from being called a top 3 player in the world to not even being in the top 10 just because you haven't been in the international stage in a few months. Being absent from 1 or 2 LANs doesn't discredit your overall skill. It goes the other way as well, playing great in 1 LAN doesn't automatically make you a top 5 player in the world.
yay and f0rsaken are top 3 for sure but Shao and ardiis are not top 3 and 4.
This is not a world player ranking. This is masters copenhagen ranking. Recency bias is on all time high
What is the criteria for best player? Is it abt consistency? (Yay)performance?(TenZ, Zeek) Clutch factor? (Shao, Marved, Mindfreak) Mechanical skill? (Cned, F0rsaken)Each one has a difference answer because the criteria matters a lot. Of lets not mention flexibility (chronicle) adaptability (Derke) and other factors too.