greedeetv
Flag: United States
Registered: February 19, 2021
Last post: August 19, 2025 at 6:42 PM
Posts: 1832
1 •• 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 •• 36

So this is wrong in just about every conceivable way. I wish they had a mute function or a block function

posted about 4 years ago

Faze almost faltered against basilisk, and version 1 has been looking really strong lately, so I’d say this is a pretty good upset pick! Also, I think version 1 always misses being in the main event by just a hair, so it would be interesting to see them there for once.

posted about 4 years ago

Eh I mean it looked like kind of a fluke to noble. Off-day maybe. But I do agree that aproto and thief have been lackluster as of late.

posted about 4 years ago

Good list, I think maybe underrating TSM but all good

posted about 4 years ago

Good list, I especially agree with the top 8

posted about 4 years ago

Actually a respectable list

posted about 4 years ago

Ok, but why EG over RNG, BC, BBG? Cuz they have a good history in other games?

posted about 4 years ago

So this is supposed to be I guess a combination of a tier list and a ranking
Everyone is saying "Oh they fall in Tier 1, or Tier 2, etc.", so I though we should clarify where exactly the line is for the tiers

  • Format it like a tier list, use my template below
  • Just use imgur or another website to capture it, or if you don't feel like doing that, just type it
  • If you want more times to be included in this list, let me know
  • You can order the teams left-to-right based on how good you think they are in the tier if you wish

The template (tell me if it doesn't work for you):

https://tiermaker.com/create/valorant-team-tier-list-926201

posted about 4 years ago

Sometimes I agree with you. It's just hard to read past the "haha sarcasm low iq idiot braindead" you spout a lot of the time.

posted about 4 years ago

At least he has 1/2 a star. More name than you.

posted about 4 years ago

Under NRG, above XSET, below Soniqs. Somewhere 7-9.

Edit: vlr.gg rankings is kind of wack because of TSM being placed that high. IMO, IMT and TSM are both below all of the teams mentioned above (as of right now).

posted about 4 years ago

I actually like you too, you offer comic relief. You're just a toxic person in your mannerisms. Like dafran. He's likeable enough too.

posted about 4 years ago

I think this is my match-to-watch out of all of the round of 16. I think both of these teams are deserving of a Challengers spot, but let's see who wants it more!

posted about 4 years ago

hekzy why are you grouping yourself with those four, I actually like a lot of your takes :(

posted about 4 years ago

Ok, good recovery from the FaZe boys. Map 3 is the decider

posted about 4 years ago

Let's face it, whoever plays and wins this match, is going to be the worst team in Challengers 1 main event. #GiveItToSoniqs!

posted about 4 years ago

Actually true. Send Acount23 and raka_gg there too

posted about 4 years ago

This aged pretty poor, nevermind

posted about 4 years ago

I mean they kind of do make sense, but it's hard to understand cuz everything he says is either sarcastic or an insult.

posted about 4 years ago

Ayyy it's the boiiii

posted about 4 years ago

Damnit, why are none of the actual interesting matches getting streamed! I guess we do have the benefit of hindsight...

posted about 4 years ago

It's another close map judging by how long it's taking. Or there is a technical problem.

posted about 4 years ago

Granted, there was a lot of teamplay, but they won a lot because of individual aim battles. TenZ was losing aimduels left and right on icebox, and individual duels were a big reason why they nearly lost. Once he started winning his battles, they choo-choo'd their way through the second half of icebox and 13-0'd split. It definitely makes a big difference.

posted about 4 years ago

daps definitely isn't the best of players, but their team has a lot of firepower, so I think it might be a bit more difficult for SQ, especially when they adapt to playing with tex.

posted about 4 years ago

Sure, they might be a little inconsistent when it comes to maps, but definitely not tier 3. High tier 2/low tier 1.

posted about 4 years ago

Reaaaaally? I think they could beat literally all of the teams you mentioned. Maybe not NRG.

posted about 4 years ago

Agreed!

posted about 4 years ago

GG. Noble pulled off the upset!

posted about 4 years ago

I actually think stylistically, T1 would've been more worrisome for 100T. I actually think 100T will win this pretty convincingly. Maybe a close map one.

posted about 4 years ago

I support NA, just not Sentinels. I just don't know, I like rooting for the underdogs and it seems to me like that team is always #1.

posted about 4 years ago

I agree, but the only team I would put them above on the vlr.gg rankings is C9B. Top 6. Also that match was SEN's first ever game as a team afaik. And they handled em on icebox. So we'll see.

posted about 4 years ago

You sound like you have the maturity level of a five year old dude. I don't know how you are still commenting on a site like this.

posted about 4 years ago

We'll see. It depends on where the line is between T1 and T2 imo. I think they could beat the teams like XSET, ABX, IMT, maybe LG, but I dunno if you could consider that Tier 1.

posted about 4 years ago

I mean it would work a hell of a lot better against the SENs and the FaZes of NA because of their tendency to rely on aim duels. EU I agree though.

posted about 4 years ago

Yeah, probably, but they would've gotten maybe 5 rounds between the two maps whereas Soniqs got 10 rounds on one map alone. They need more practice on other maps, that's their issue.

posted about 4 years ago

No upward mobility (except omen) on a map that's played primarily on different height levels. No entries, barely any flashes. Tragic comp.

posted about 4 years ago

I mean, this isn't the first time you edited a comment to make yourself look better. It's ok, we all know what really happened :)

posted about 4 years ago

I mean... in what world did they play bad? They played better than one might expect from a 32 seed, and vlr.gg ranking is still pretty accurate imo.

posted about 4 years ago

Really? I mean even getting 13-0'd, they proved on the first map that they deserve their #9 rating on vlr.gg, but definitely not the #32 seed. Sucks they didn't get a higher seed, but that's my only takeaway. This is about as good as everyone expected.

posted about 4 years ago

No, on map two you said "13-4". You were off by four rounds.

posted about 4 years ago

WELP. They put in good work on Icebox. NT.

posted about 4 years ago

We're going to MAP THREEEEE

posted about 4 years ago

I agree. I'm not sure I like Sova over Sage. Rest of the picks are pretty good though based on what I've seen. Maybe cypher > killjoy.

posted about 4 years ago

Did you actually just edit your comment like that. This is why this dude needs the boot. ADMINS WYA.

posted about 4 years ago

Menace living up to his name so far

posted about 4 years ago
1 •• 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 •• 36