Anguibok
Flag: France
Registered: December 21, 2022
Last post: August 17, 2025 at 5:03 PM
Posts: 4512
1 •• 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 •• 89

I don't think male have that ._.

posted 2 months ago

The 1st tweet is just communication, that's the 2nd tweet that is really alarming https://x.com/sarah_frags/status/1924602688081162336

posted 2 months ago

After 2500 years of science and building a judiciary system, people have forgotten the principle of presumption of innocence. That was true for Sinatraa and that is also true for Flor. Nobody should have their career destroyed by accusation, especially if that's not backed by proof. If you consider that Sinatraa was mistreated, then you shouldn't hope the same happen to Flor and you should hope that Riot has learned from Sinatra affair. The only question is "Do we have enough proof to be sure she is guilty", if yes then okay you can hate (But also if you do think that single indirect testimony and unrelated tweet is enough proof to prove someone is guilty, then you ask from the return of the Spanish inquisition, and nobody expect the Spanish inquisition.)

So yeah, even if we have to trust and support the victims, it's not good that we are back to the Spanish inquisition era where you are guilty on a single testimony, this cost Sinatraa's Career. Also we should stop giving credit to those people looking for virtue signaling that dig into tweet that are not related to the affair. (And especially not using edgy tweet send by edgy teenager as a "proof" unrelated to the affair). We shouldn't want to leave in a world where anyone can lose their job based on not proved accusation, because if that's happen many people will lose their job being innocent. Now the real challenge is to find a way to both keep "presumption of innocence" and "trust and support of the victims", wish is hard to do both. I just hope the truth will prevail and if Flor is guilty she will lose her career, and the victim could recover.

Maybe we should just shut the shut up on the subject and wait the proof from both party, because let's be honest for the moment we have nothing in both camp, and it's speak versus speak, this is a important topic we can't just meme and clickbait on it

posted 2 months ago

Solution 2 would be the "Faria-community compromise", probably the easiest one to do, that need a 11 week tournament when a act is usually 9 week, so hard to say if we dont want a change in the mapool in the middle of the split (Maybe for playoffs we will have no choice but to change mapool between regular and PO)

About solution 3, tier 2schedule is already messy as fuck anyway (Beside EMEA that is preatty clean), Split 2 EMEA T2 is almost over, so technically that would mess the schedule, the solution is just to transform this event into ascention

posted 2 months ago

I think wanting 2 full round-robin (+12 games) isn't possible, but I agree we need a little bit more games, but it would be better if they are no overlap

Solution 1 : 2024 format
if we go to 2024 format thats one game more

Solution 2 : 1 round-robin for split 2
If we want split 2 to be more important, we can do :

  • Kickoffs
  • Split 1 : 2 groups
  • Split 2 : 1 single round-robin
    This add only 6 games per team, so it sounds doable

Solution 3 : Ascention after split 1
4 team could be ascended temporary, doing 2 group of 8. The top 2 stays for the next year (And have to invest into facilities in Berlin)
2 games more per teams (And solve Ascention pardox of being able to end 2nd to champions and stil get relegated)
(Not sure if it's possible to play the split 2 only without facility and consider it as a one shot event like champions)

posted 2 months ago

I think it's without the Chinese views

posted 2 months ago

If you have good proof I see no reason why the police wouldn't do anything (And if thats the case thats an even bigger problem yeah).
You try police, and then if police doesnt work you go twitter (that will force police to do something)

posted 2 months ago

"rape/ SA is notoriously one of the hardest crimes to get a guilty verdict for because of the nature of the law."
I agree with that, and the reason is "Because it's almost impossible to have proof", so if you have proof --> police

To me "enough evidence" doesnt mean anything and either you have evidence and tribunal and twitter will beleive you (so better go tribunal), or you don't have evidence and then twitter is better because of the 83%, beside really few exception they are no in between

PS : I like the fact you bring out the 83%, nice ref

posted 2 months ago

If you have evidence then police > twitter.

Twitter can be usefull only if you dont have any x)

posted 2 months ago

Good analysis, but the problem with that is "How the people they warn can figure out if that's true or false"

posted 2 months ago

I hate maptrade

posted 3 months ago

Going to 16 team with 2 groups was one of the idea I have in the past (Same idea for APAC with East and South conferences), but now I totally changed my mind, you can't split NA and SA, it's not possible, the market are not big enough, more team will just make the pie smaller, 4 team for NA is enough to cover all the market, 2 team for BR is already enough, 1 for LAS is good, and LAN need at least 1 team.
NA is the fastest shrinking market (The problem with NA is that they are trash to find new talent, and T2 is now in shamble), if another league is created that would be because Eurasian market is continue to grow (Korea and India grow fast, VN and OCE doesnt have a spot, Russia will be back after war, MENA doesnt have a team), so probably a split between East Asia and South Asia where South asia could steal some EMEA part (MENA or Russia for exemple)

posted 3 months ago

So basically no change in 2027 ? It's weird IG doesnt want to seize the opportunity it's ont of the most popular org in CN right ?

posted 3 months ago

And the maps they won convincingly (Pearl) was with harbor

posted 3 months ago

How many BBL did you pay to say that ?

posted 3 months ago

I'm curious to have more detail about your arguments ^^

posted 3 months ago

Nope but it's the biggest in LAN, and we have no LAN representant yet, it's important to cover every market

posted 3 months ago

Thats fair, because the event sucks, the qualifier for the EWC is a punition, so instead of the winner, it will be the looser that will qualify to the event

posted 3 months ago

Yeah more time pass, and more I struggle to see Vitality as a french team

posted 3 months ago

EMEA : GX out, team spirit in (2031 if the war continue in 2026)
APAC : No change (Before playoffs I would have say RRQ out Boom in)
NA : EG out, G2 in. Leviatan out EXL in. Furia out Canids in.
CHINA : TEC out, AG out, Invictus gaming in, LGD in.

But to be fair they are a lot of chance they are no new partner team in 2027 if they reduce the number of partner team as it is considered by Faria

What is gaimin gladiators ?

posted 3 months ago

I'm doing my best to bring intresting debate T.T

posted 3 months ago

Script

Hi VLR, this week I want to talk about group for split 2, because to me they are a lot off issues with it.

The first issue and the most easiest one to understand is the fact the 2 ascention team could end up in 2 different group, and this is a probleme because if one of them end in the group of death, this team might get eleminated from Tier 1 even if they are the best ascention team among the 2 ascention teams, while the other one would manage to go to playoffs and potentially save their place in ascention…

So they are 2 possibility to solve this problem, first add a rule that ensure that the 2 ascention team end in the same group, the 2nd solution is to allow a team that end last to go to Ascention.

The 2nd and the 3rd problem I want to point at, is a little but more complex and it require to explain how the groups are made. First things, Split 2 groups are only based on Split 1 groups, and doesnt take in account the result of the playoffs, wish is already a probleme because you technicaly can have the 3 teams that goes to Toronto that end in the same group in split 2, and if DRX would have beat Paper Rex, that would have been the case.
[Explanation of groups]

Anyway, so the draw is based on last group result, and how it’s made is a little bit weird, because, the team that end in the same place in both group, are paired together to be sure they don’t play against each other, yeah it’s a little bit weird concept, so 1st together, 2nd together, and so on, and Riot will draw 3 pair to swap their groups. The idea Riot have, is to swap half of team wish on the paper isnt the worst idea because thats mean you will play against 3 new team, and they are only 3 team maximum that you will not play that year, with another draw they are a risk you end up with group that are really similar from the split 1 and teams plays against the same teams.

But the problem is that they put the pair in pool, so basically the team that will be swap will be either the 1st or the 2nd but not both. Either the 3rd or the 4th but not both, and either the 5th and the 6th and not both, and thats create a weird side effect. With that system, you are sure that every team that end 2nd in a Split 1 group and team that end 1st in the opposite split 1 group will end together in the split 2 group, and thats exactly what did happen to Sentinels and G2, the 2 best team in Amercias without any doubt, where forced by the rule of draw to end in the same group, and even more unlucky, the 4th best team in playoff is also in their group.

I like the idea of having only 3 team that will swap, but how it’s done is really bad. You can keep this criteria and still make group based on playoffs, it’s possible. And if you really don’t want to base it on playoff, you don’t have to make pool for the swap. But let’s be honnest, the best solution would be to comeback to 2024 format, with just a small change. Split 1 we do intra-group, and split 2 we do crossgroup, so a single round robin over the year and every problem are solve.

Anyway before we finish this video, lets talk about the only group that has not been draw yet EMEA. Based on the draw rule I can even show you that they are only 4 possibility of Split 2 groups in EMEA, and 3 thing that will not change whatever the draw will be :

  • First Heretics and BBL are in the same group, and in the opposite group we will have Liquid and Fnatic, yeah, even if one of those 2 pairs end up top 2.
  • Second NAVI and Karmine are in the same group, and in the opposite group we will have FUT and Vitality
  • And Finally GiantX and M8 are in the same group, and in the opposite group we will have KOI and APEKS, Apeks was kinda lucky to loose against Giants, because Koi seems worse than Mate.

So thats all for today video, dont hesitate to tell me wish EMEA draw would be the worst, and as usual… Byee.

posted 3 months ago

Why would it happen ?

posted 3 months ago

Who is lowest of Chin a?

posted 3 months ago

Wouldn't be surprise if it was the biggest spanish fanbase

posted 3 months ago

I think we need to rework grossroot a lot and that the problem isnt that we lack of 3rd party T2, schedule are already full in T2, they are too many tier 2 that struggle, but we also need a fully amator tier 3.
For exemple, the fusion of the 6 SEA league into 1 big league was a good thing, we couldn't have that many pro team in SEA, but we should have kept the fully amator National league under the new T2 fused league (With almost no cash price, so this does cost almost nothing to Riot but still preserve the grassroot), if Finland does have their Tier 3 (It's more a T4 TBH), Indonesia should have their tier 3.

To me the ideal solution would be to have :

  • Tier 1 that correspond to "continent", fully professionnal team
  • Tier 2 that correspond to scrimmingpool (NA/LAN/LAS/BR in Am), mostly professional team, with top team having a shot to qual to international event (ideal is 4 T2 league per T1 for format issues), this kinda correspond to region in prefranchised era.
  • Tier 3 that correspond to language (MY/VN/TH/PH in ASEAN, FR/ES/DE etc in Europe), it's fully amator, but it may be broadcasted (Can be optionnal in minor scrimpool like Oceania) and allow to qual to T2
  • Tier 4 that are national league (Optionnal), no broadcast, no pro, based on the national league from north, it gives a qual to T3

Premier still exist and allow to qual to T2 (And maybe also to T3, but it's not an obligation)

posted 3 months ago

Hiw WR where under 50% before nerf, so yeah, he is definitly dead.
Tejo is kinda a useless agent if you dont have the discipline of G2

posted 3 months ago

Yup they will need a miracle

posted 3 months ago

I've seen crazier @.@

posted 3 months ago

This is probably a popular opinion but I thing Split 2 group draw rule is absolutely horrible and make absolutely no sense, so I made a full video to explain the problem with the group and how to solve the problem.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnKTrzvjq6s

tldw ;

  • The 2 assention team should be in the same group to be sure the best ascention team is the team that will stay. G2 being relegated because being in the group of death will not happen, but if it would be a scandal
  • Drawing based on group only is dumb as fuck, in APAC we where one series away to have the 3 team in Tornoto in the same group
  • The 1st of Alpha is bound to end in the same group of 2nd of group omega (And this could push team to end 3rd instead of 2nd)
  • In EMEA they are 4 possible draw https://i.ibb.co/x8dcJysf/4-possibility-EMEA.png

Wish would be the worst unbalanced group for EMEA ?

posted 3 months ago

I try to be as plain as I am in real life

posted 3 months ago

Unranked level 300

posted 3 months ago

KJ and Astra last act, Sage > Viper > Astra overall

posted 3 months ago

Dont BUry mate too soon now Click autobench

posted 3 months ago

Same reason than Vita, in Kickoff nobody have the idea of what was the meta, so team that play full aim have an advantage

posted 3 months ago

But what is even if they bomb they are still top 4 team in EMEA ?

posted 3 months ago

"How does this make any sense? Why are Academy teams protected from relegation?"
This is normal, it's good for stability, I just think every SEA subregion should have one team that would be protected (So either 5 or 7 teams depending if you give 2 to MN/TW and MY/ID)

the problem here is how is the rulebook, Naos shouldn't have never been relegated, Z11 should be the relegated team because they didnt manage to qualify, (Or we could have only 3 relegated team, it wouldnt be shocking to do that)

posted 3 months ago

Did it bother you when it was Vita that did the exact same ?

posted 3 months ago

They are not 40 ping between HK and Korea

posted 3 months ago

"Better ping to all Pacific region servers, improving overall quality of the region."
Are you sure about that ?Ping between Koreaand Thaisland isnt like 100 ?

posted 3 months ago

Hello vlr, we are about to start this week podcast, come say hi ^^
We are doing EMEA and APAC and if we have time the other region

https://www.youtube.com/live/37_c8Zq0DHQ?si=c_oFeRz2R36f_rZb

posted 3 months ago

They have school tomorrow

posted 3 months ago

Beside Derke and Less... meh, good but definitely not stars

posted 3 months ago

How Vitality was a superteam ??

posted 3 months ago

M8 with Click out can be really strong, KC isnt bad, they are 2 round behind the top 4. Vita is awful they cant play in team and when they try they loose they individual power.

So yeah odd are very low but, it's not dead yet

posted 3 months ago

Vitality was always a bad team, they where top in kickoff because everyone was bad because everydy has no idea of what the meta is, so aimedemon manage to win

posted 3 months ago

Any advice to learn the language ?

posted 3 months ago

Sound = letter, almost no diphthong (English is a nightmare to prononce), no th sound (Technically they are but in half of spanish word you pronounce it s anyway)

posted 3 months ago

Spanish exist

posted 3 months ago
1 •• 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 •• 89