Room temp iq

Look at the VFL page and you tell me

I IGLed Primmie in VFL

Fuck this guy

What counts as sniffing if not two 3-2 bo5 champ finals? Like yeah, his teams have choked, but i think we can safely say he's sniffed

Maybe mixed... but artzin and cortezia are the current rumors, so why not go full br

He'll go to furia with mibr core and maybe silentz

How do they have h2h vs NRG? Aren't they 1-1

Yeah but NRG for instance beat them most recently... so there's gotta be something else

Long covid

Because he was at one point. This was before flyuh ever called. Brawk had been on calling on complexity and other tier 3s

I don't get how we are here again. They have brawk who called for moist when they were doing well, getting third behind guard and m80 in tier two. Ethan and s0m are both great midrounders.... just let brawk make the first call and take on the pressure of the title

I still dont understand why john is not on senti...
Originally it seemed like it was because either john didnt want to play vyse or zellsis didnt want to learn tejo.... but now zellsis is playing cypher and viper and john and narrate are swapping around breach and tejo. Surely zellsis can just go to breach, narrate on tejo and john can be on his best role

Not asking for leaks, just theories

Surely he doesn't sit on the bench the rest of the season...
He's pretty flexy, so there are a lot of emea teams that might be able to upgrade.

So where does he go?

According to staff, he was clashing with sayf in the ideas department. Maybe he will go to liquid. That'd be cool

Title
...but why does Trust in Plug have to play YFP when yhey are the top of the 2-3 teams? Obvi swiss will end up with this problem where there's odd number of 3-2 teams and 2-3 teams... and they resolve this by having on matchup betqeen the two records... but why tf make the statistically highest performing 2-3 team have to play a 3-2 team in their elim game? Should be the top 3-2 team playing the bottom 2-3 team

Happens when you call

🤣🤣

Sliggy, for instance. See where you stand. Some brackets go more or less as expected, some don't. It's recreation

@mods

Can we please get better data visualization for our pickems? I just wanna know about where I stand on the curve. Just a simple histogram with a "you" marker. If you dont wanna put in effort for data visualization, at least give us a percentile range... I'm tired of manually adding the percentages above or below.

They're gonna be good and have a chance against lev, but idk about qualling... tbh i just think 2G are not that good. They were playing everyone close in ascension, even teams that shouldnt have even been there like TSM. M80 full crumbled in the finals as expected

Lukxo is gonna take his spot and he knows it. Playing sadge mode

Fkn floppy 🤣

Part of the reason thats the case is that the culture of esports isnt about development bc orgs have no money, not bc players can never bounce back. I agree that they need to look at everything objectively... and my point abt that is that if I'm ge, id rather at least have a pretty sure slot in playoffs and then maybe make a run then trust the scouting to pull off a miracle

Didnt forget... That was the first year of franchising where there wasnt an established t2. Texture was 100% a known quantity. Monyet was also fighting for international slots on onic g. Possibly that's good scouting, but the way it seems you are defining tier 1, there were only like 20-30 t1 players in apac before that season... that leaves a much larger pool to be CONSIDERED t2. So if they were t2 talent then, it's only by technicality

Make an actual counter argument then smdh

Xccurate started calling and his performance dipped. Im not willing to write off saya from one bad season. Esports fans and 1 year memory istg

Only the right mix... t2 talent still fails more than it succeeds. Adding t2 talent to existing rosters is much more successful

Would be a good point if ge was actually good at recruiting... they just need a year where they're actually in the mix

Edit: also i would 100% agree in cases like the brazilian scene... but those are cases where the incumbent players have not actually had any real success.

Krystal is a great pick up but...
Saya, xccurate, sscary...
That's a very solid four.
Maybe beyn to round it out

Edit:
A lot of you are saying saya and xccurate are washed as if T1 weren't top half of apac last year with no carries. GE just need a decent season so they arent absolute dogshit for 3 years.
Xcurrate has played valorant for ONE year lmao he definitionally cannot be washed. He's old, yes, but you cant say washed after someone switches games.

Many of you are also saying t2 talent is the way to go... normally I'd agree if you are adding the talent to an established and accomplished roster, but cobbled together t2 teams rely heavily on the players being absolutely cracked like woot or riens etc... and that depends largely on the talent pool you are drawing from

If GE make a single event this year with this roster, feel free to come back and call me stupid. Just rmbr it makes you the idiot if they have another bottom feeder season

Rinsed them

I think the point is that those arent actually ur bottom feeders. Think the remark was about furia and mibr never scouting proper tier 2 talent from brazil when there clearly is... 2g obvi and glrs looked pretty decent too

Everyone clowning on net and bcj

But nismo had a shocker... even from beach jail

Bro koala is good but he misses soooo many op shots. I dont think he's allat at opping. Agree with nismo breach jail and comp choices tho

Sadly, you may be right. Very hard to beat a team twice in a tourney, and they've already beat everyone....

Wym

Yall are all wrong. None of these players are quite tier 1 ready. Quality of play was so low this tourney. They didnt belong

Most 2 man advantages thrown in a win game, no?

Seven literally the only one making good decisions atm

Whelp

Scripted FR

It'll be weirdly the same course as shanghai.

TH lose in the upper semis to an americas team, only to knock out the last two americas teams in 4th and 3rd before losing to a region that's never won before in the grand finals.

Nah c still worse

9-30

Nah

Allat

Huh?

He hadn't had a tier one opportunity until then. Proved himself the first chance he had and now he's repeating the impact

Yeah, obviously thats the tiebreaker in the seeding... but maybe vlr has the wrong leaderboard for points, and, if not, then why have different criteria for seeding and for points?

Thanks the question I'm asking. Not asking what it's based on

Why have two different metrics for seeding and for circuit points tho... that makes very little sense