100%, no idea how people believe mindfreak is better than mako let alone mindfreak being top 2 on prx
I think its bc mindfreak is quite likeable
| Flag: | Australia |
| Registered: | June 10, 2023 |
| Last post: | May 2, 2026 at 7:17 PM |
| Posts: | 9195 |
100%, no idea how people believe mindfreak is better than mako let alone mindfreak being top 2 on prx
I think its bc mindfreak is quite likeable
cry is free
oh wait, I fell for the bait again
Mako: Overall, 1st on drx for numbers
https://www.vlr.gg/event/stats/2097/valorant-champions-2024
2nd, 1.02 rating.
https://www.vlr.gg/event/stats/2005/champions-tour-2024-pacific-stage-2
3rd, 0.97 rating
https://www.vlr.gg/event/2002/champions-tour-2024-pacific-stage-1/playoffs
1st, 1.16 rating
https://www.vlr.gg/event/stats/1924/champions-tour-2024-pacific-kickoff
1st, 1.17 rating
https://www.vlr.gg/event/stats/1657/valorant-champions-2023
1st, 1.06 rating
You are using your own personal opinion on an objective ranking, for example "as for RRQ, they are insane man; ive watched some of their games and they just need to fix a few things;" there is no objective justification or objective ranking of rrq as your justification as to why they are s is purely just your opinion.
There is no problem with this personal opinion but just dont market your ranking as objective then
-j0nggg + Leo
Free win for Poopa Rex
alright now your obviously trolling, goodbye
ye you're right, he is obviously 5th
lev hasn't even played since last year and they lost their best player and yet you say they are the best team in the world? They were around 5-6th last year and they have downgraded and you are putting that at 1.
Assuming off season events matter like you think, trace and drx are doing better than rrq so shouldn't they be higher, you put drx and trace in b and rrq in s?? Even if you go off past results, drx and trace would still be higher.
There are so many inconsistencies with your logic that it must either be you applying your logic incorrectly, you just going off gut and so you are not ranking them objectively or you are just heavily biased.
Another example of this bias is with t1 and g2, t1 is A and g2 Is S and yet T1 has played better so far in the off season, this is assuming off season matters like you think. And so obviously you are adding an element of past results into your ranking as well as otherwise t1 would be higher than G2 but yet you do the exact opposite in other situations like with rrq compared with drx and trace.
There are many many more instances of this but these examples should be enough
fair but forsaken had a stinker this year
you say this isnt about emotion and based off your comments you are trying to give an objective ranking but your biases are very obvious and are showing
for some reason i'm being spammed with downfrags but here are the numbers like I said.
here are the last few vct tournaments and his stats and you can see he is easily the worst in terms of numbers
The only objective way to measure ones impact is to look at the numbers, Ignoring these numbers and accepting the idea that he is the best or one of the best on the team without any actual measurable way of justification, is just absurd. This exact same thing happened with derke this year, people thought he was horrible but people soon realised it was just recency bias.
https://www.vlr.gg/event/stats/2005/champions-tour-2024-pacific-stage-2,
5th, 0.97 rating
https://www.vlr.gg/event/stats/1999/champions-tour-2024-masters-shanghai
4-5th, no rating bc its china but he has lowest acs and 2nd worst kd (only 3 games tho)
https://www.vlr.gg/event/stats/2002/champions-tour-2024-pacific-stage-1
Tied for 5th, 1.06 rating
https://www.vlr.gg/event/stats/1921/champions-tour-2024-masters-madrid
5th, 0.84 rating
https://www.vlr.gg/event/stats/1924/champions-tour-2024-pacific-kickoff
3rd, 1.06 rating (only 3 games tho)
https://www.vlr.gg/event/stats/1657/valorant-champions-2023
Tied for 5th, 1 rating
this is the most braindead shit I've seen all week
no, he's always been the worst on the team in terms of numbers
aleksander if u call him a pro and if not then benjy prob
your ranking practically all these teams as if off-season actually matters, like edg d tier and dfm s tier, off-season events don't matter.
In your other responses you also talk about how the history of the team matters and thats why u ranked Loud in A tier but then you put teams like edg in d and dfm in s????
I thought the only change for pros was that they could be punished if they said something inappropriate outside the game, what he said was already against the rules as it happened during a game?
I could be very wrong I know basically nothing about this btw.
that was my first time posting in 3 weeks lil bro
thats why I said he "had" 0 fans, the general consensus is that asuna is terrible and should be replaced even with his positive stats take this vlr page, https://www.vlr.gg/323286/list-of-asuna-haters
sure there are a few asuna fans but they are greatly outnumbered, so I dont get how you think the general consensus is that asuna is seen as a goat.
no way u think asuna was overated, he would constantly get shit on everywhere for being shit and had basically 0 fans, no idea where this idea that people thought he was a goat, that would be only in 2021
In 2023 he also had a 1.05 rating and was 2nd best on 100t and 2022 he had around a 1.1 rating although most good players have high ratings bc they verse a few shit teams in open quals and such, lastly in 2021 he was one of the best players itw.
It's just confirmation bias tbh because he really isnt as bad as people make him out to be
I mean bro had a 1.05 rating last year which aint even that bad
all the teams I mentioned lost to tier 2/3 teams apart from Geng and Prx who both lost to mid tier 1 teams and they both almost lost to tier 2/3 teams
this doenst even include 100t and c9 last year who both did well in stage 1 after they lost to tier 2/3 teams in the off season
if the only good duelists left are Okeanos and zeldris then keeping asuna sounds like a good idea
yeah I guess off season events matter and thats why KC, TH, Geng, EDG, and PRX did so bad this year since they did horrible in the off season
wolves clear
u really think off season events matter?
Geng at the end of last year with their masters winning roster played 2 games in which they lost to fut and almost lost to a tier 2/3 team
Start of 2024 both c9 and 100t lost to tier 2 NA teams and yet both did very well in stage 1.
End of 2023 TH lost to fokus and didnt even make it out of Red Bull emea qualifiers and yet a month or so later they did very well in kickoff and stage 1.
Off season events don't matter and I don't know why people keep putting emphasis on them.
ye so thats why keeping asuna is a good idea
kd aint sus but his hs% is super sus, especially when he goes 60%+ almost every game and then theres that random game in which he has 6%
I would say hes cheating but its weird how he hasnt been banned yet
To determine if there’s a biological advantage you need to look at the representation of trans players relative to the overall population of bio women within Valorant.
It's like if you had said that people above 5 foot 3 are generally better at valorant than compared with people under 5 foot 3, this is a stupid argument if you're just looking at who is seen doing well in gc. 5 foot 3 people may be proportionally better as if only 5% of val pop is below 5 foot 3 but in pro play 10% of players are below 5 foot 3 then there is a potential chance for there to be biological advantages.
I don't necessarily disagree with you but your generalising the success of all trans people off cherry picked data and you have a lack of understanding of proportional statistics.
Lets be honest, they weren't gonna be picked up by another tier 1 team anyway.
Also, the same thing happened with dapr on sen but no one talks about that.
Its not only due to misogyny but misogyny would still play a pretty large role
Discord