Zerphyr1
Flag: Australia
Registered: June 10, 2023
Last post: August 8, 2025 at 10:23 AM
Posts: 8369
1 •• 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 •• 162

but when 100t fans collide with 100t fans then you get negative times negative which is positive and so 100t has positive aura when there are 2

posted about a year ago

acha q o less iria

posted about a year ago

100t

posted about a year ago

they terrible

posted about a year ago

?????

posted about a year ago

by supporting 100t

posted about a year ago

I'm your humble king

posted about a year ago

πŸ₯±πŸ₯±πŸ₯±πŸ₯±
https://www.vlr.gg/event/leaderboard/1971/challengers-league-2024-north-america-stage-1

https://www.vlr.gg/pickem/f3da8758

edit: why did vlr get rid of my title emojis 😠

posted about a year ago

I hope your whole family has a nice Christmas

posted about a year ago

pacific showdown

americas showdown?

Gold 2 wins 26-15

posted about a year ago

100t 2-1 g0ng
Th 2-1 Geng
100t 2-0 TH

FUCK THIS SHIT

posted about a year ago

what in the bait

posted about a year ago

if T1 win then I take a shower

posted about a year ago

what in the shit

posted about a year ago

no reason...

posted about a year ago

edg always finds a way

posted about a year ago

bro fell for the bait

posted about a year ago

self promo?

ignore this message

posted about a year ago

STRAIGHT FAX

posted about a year ago

it's a bait (not supposed to be taken literally and seriously) you bum

posted about a year ago

I see u have joined the dark side, bronzil

posted about a year ago

g2 only getting 2 rounds

posted about a year ago

pls downvote me

posted about a year ago

its not all flukes but rather the system and chemistry plays a massive role and not so much the individual skill of each player

posted about a year ago

definitely has nothing to do with the past fps experience in these regions.

if we keep treating apac and cn like this then we lose viewership and this will never fix the issue of both of them being bad at fps games.

I understand this is a bait but some people genuinely have this outlook

posted about a year ago

depends if benjy shows up or not.

also depends if boaster does shit like usual

posted about a year ago

prob for economic/viewership reasons. I don't think many people care about the actual concept of only european countries competeting to determine which one is the best. (I might be wrong idk)

posted about a year ago

no way bro is bumping his own thread after 2 minutes

no offence but why r u so hungry for online attention?

posted about a year ago

agreed but I think the viewers made it political and not eurovision themselves

posted about a year ago

why is every single concept somehow made political.

can't we just enjoy eurovision for what it is.

I understand u cant do this for everything but I don't see why u can't for eurovision

posted about a year ago

ummmmmm ok

posted about a year ago

rare, self-aware indian

posted about a year ago

and?? how does this disprove para guys point (apart from title)

posted about a year ago

t1??

I don't understand what u could prove with asking me this?

posted about a year ago

how is he wrong?? apart from the title

posted about a year ago

"again
a human who lacks the ability of critical thinking and civilised discussing.
you dont even know what politics is man
how is discussing the impact of politics in eurovision
the same as having a political discussion/debate

political discussion: 2 parts disagreeing
discussing the politics influence: 2 parts discussing how it impacted

like ur so rude and u clearly lack the brains to back it up"

  1. first line is just 1 word and is neither an argument or an ad hominem

2nd and 3rd line: ad homenims.

4th and 5th: ur putting words in my mouth that I never said. I never said it was a political discussion/ debate but I rather just said that you are talking about politics (mentioning politics which does not mean having a discussion or debate about politics).

this sentence is not an argument in itself but is rather a question and ur using the false dilemma fallacy by suggesting that I said "the impact of politics in eurovision is the same as having a political discussion/debate" when I didn't and therefor I might not agree or disagree with that statement.

6th and 7th: not an argument nor ad hominem as ur just reiterating the parts of the previous discussion.

8th: ad hominem:

conc.
every single point u made was an ad hominem and so ur whole "argument" was only ad homonyms and no points that weren't attacking my character were addressed.

posted about a year ago

so if I just say this for example:
I disagree
I disagree
I disagree
I respectfully disagree

ur fucking stupid
ur braindead
u lack brain cells

OMG LOOK I USED 4 LINES OF ARGUMENT AND 3 LINES OF AD HOMINEM SO ACTUALLY I AM NOT BEING RUDE AND DISRESPECTFUL AS 4 > 3

posted about a year ago

im pretty sure if they win the gf then they are tied with sen on champ points

posted about a year ago

no

posted about a year ago
1 •• 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 •• 162