well first one is just true but the second one is pretty easy for yay.
Flag: | Australia |
Registered: | June 10, 2023 |
Last post: | August 10, 2025 at 1:17 PM |
Posts: | 8370 |
well first one is just true but the second one is pretty easy for yay.
thats back when they were good and not in tier 3
ye the esports difference is pretty big but one is decades old and has plenty of time to build history and rivalries and staff talent whilst the other is 3 years old and is still trying to figure out how to handle the esports scene.
no way ur complaining about val system when ur team is in tier 3 and has maybe 10 fans max
why r u comparing 2 different games which are designed for different audiences and are just so different. the games have different spray patterns and guns and val is more similar overwatch then cs. funny how the only people who keep comparing the two games are cs diehards.
one is not "better" then the other, it's all subjective.
The reason why it matters how many posts u have is bc u always say that cs > val and talk about cs on a fucking valorant thread when u have 9k posts and still play valorant. If cs is so much better why r u wasting ur time on valorant and or valorant threads
please leave we dont want you. you already complain about cs > val but u have 9k posts.
nasr 2-1
ah ok that makes sense lol
ur still talking about cs? dont get ur point
do u ever shut up about cs. honestly ur the one who keeps bringing up cs (hard to believe I know)
shut up bc u dont know what your talking about and ur using acyrologia. use brain before posting
ase 2-1
hes never done worse then -2 whereas everyone else on the team drops a -20 every tenth game or so. (apart from AAAAY who is just cracked)
similar to what fennel is right now tho. I just dont think they have versed a good enough opponent to adapt and are like what edg is in china whereas I would consider edg gc to be like drx. hope this makes sense