Vortexy
Country: South Korea
Registered: April 18, 2021
Last post: May 18, 2024 at 2:59 AM
Posts: 2756
1 •• 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 •• 54

glad to be of assistance

posted about 2 years ago

sounds like Sage advice

bu dum crash

posted about 2 years ago

here have a cookie 🍪 <3

posted about 2 years ago

ty lol

posted about 2 years ago

⢰⣶⠶⢶⣶⣶⡶⢶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⡶⠶⢶⣶⣶⣶⣶
⠘⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠄⠄⠄⠈⠉⠄⠄⣹⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿
⠄⠤⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣤⡈⠙⠛⣿⣿⣿⣧⣀⠠⣤⣤⣴⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶
⢠⠄⠄⣀⣀⣀⣭⣿⣿⣿⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣤⣿⣿⠉⠉⠉⢉⣉⡉⠉⠉⠙⠛⠛
⢸⣿⡀⠄⠈⣹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠿⠿⢿⣿⣿⣷⣾⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠛⢩⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⣿⣿⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣄⣠⣴⣿⣷⣭⣻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠸⠿⣿⣿⣿⠋⣴⡟⠋⠈⠻⠿⠿⠛⠛⠛⠛⠛⠃⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⡁⠈⠉⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⣤⡄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠈⠄⠈⠻⠿⠛⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⣠⣄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⣀⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⡀⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠉⠉⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⠐⠒⠒⠄⠄⠄⠄⠉⢸⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⢿⣦⣄⣠⣄⠛⠟⠃⣀⣀⡀⠄⠄⣀⣀⣀⣀⣀⣀⡀⢀⣰⣦⣼⣿⣿⡿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣿⠄⢰⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⢛⣥⣾⣟⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡆⠈⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⣧⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿

posted about 2 years ago

Bump(ing myself)

posted about 2 years ago

Bump x2

posted about 2 years ago

honestly I was thinking of something like a rewards system, but 2 reasons why probably not at the moment:

1: Just asking for a nice touch like an easily accessible community voting option is probably way more appealing to devs than asking for a ton of things to come along with it. idk if it makes sense, but it might feel too overwhelming for devs if someone asks for some big elaborate feature and could result in less willingness to do it. Better to ask and pressure them slowly. >:)

2: This is only a quick way of seeing of how the community thinks about certain matches. Pickems are probably the far better alternative if you want to reward good predictions.

posted about 2 years ago

Guys guys, I did a quick edit of what I was thinking of here. Obviously it's not of the greatest quality, but just a rough idea bringing to life what I was thinking of.

posted about 2 years ago

ikr. I actually made this suggestion some time ago too here but at the bottom if you scroll down, Enigma actually put a little thinking face emoji (my hopes are probably too high rn... but still...)

posted about 2 years ago

lol

posted about 2 years ago

ty m8 <3

posted about 2 years ago

area by cross sections and linear approximation and Euler's method sadge

posted about 2 years ago

edit: oops meant to respond to #4

posted about 2 years ago

uh no lol, just random number off the top of my head

posted about 2 years ago

Randomly doing my calc hw and out of nowhere had a sudden flash of utter brilliance :) so I naturally took the time to voice my constructive suggestions like a good Samaritan.

You guys should add a community voting option under every match. So for example, if you click on an upcoming match like TL vs C9 tomorrow, you can vote for the team you think will win and everyone else can see what the general community consensus is, like 68% for TL and 32% for C9 or something like that.

posted about 2 years ago

lol you made an account just to say this?

posted about 2 years ago

damn what an essay lol, but well said

posted about 2 years ago

kekw is that a Sen fanboy talking?

posted about 2 years ago

I thoroughly agree

posted about 2 years ago

common Hudsen W

posted about 2 years ago

VS 2-1 :D

hopefully

posted about 2 years ago

or..... VK just didn't need to exploit something they were fully aware of and especially after other high-profile teams had been previously DQ'd for

posted about 2 years ago

That's nonsense. High profile teams have already been DQ'd because of this. There's no doubt that they were fully aware that this was an exploit not supposed to be taken advantage of.

posted about 2 years ago

It's not harsh at all. If anything VK should be celebrating that they're not automatically losing the map. Heck they should be ecstatic that they're not DQ'd at all and have a chance replay Acend.

posted about 2 years ago

Judging by your posts, you haven't been on here since the past 4 days. This is just over 24 hours but the biggest news is that VK defeated Acend 13-8 in the last map, but they used an exploitable Cypher cam location which others teams in previous tourneys have been punished for using. Of the 6 rounds where the cam was used, Acend lost 4 of those rounds according to Riot so they flipped all 6 rounds that the cam was used (effectively 4) so from a 13-8 to a 12-10 in favor of Acend plus one more round for economic damage from losing the potentially 4 winnable rounds. Lots of Brazilians are understandably pissed (not all tho). If you ask me, the logic and reasoning behind the round conversions are justified, but Riot should have definitely acted sooner rather than waiting 10 hours after the match was over.

a bit over 100 words but oh well

posted about 2 years ago

common Tamagao W

posted about 2 years ago

⢰⣶⠶⢶⣶⣶⡶⢶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⡶⠶⢶⣶⣶⣶⣶
⠘⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠄⠄⠄⠈⠉⠄⠄⣹⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿
⠄⠤⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣤⡈⠙⠛⣿⣿⣿⣧⣀⠠⣤⣤⣴⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶
⢠⠄⠄⣀⣀⣀⣭⣿⣿⣿⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣤⣿⣿⠉⠉⠉⢉⣉⡉⠉⠉⠙⠛⠛
⢸⣿⡀⠄⠈⣹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠿⠿⢿⣿⣿⣷⣾⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠛⢩⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⣿⣿⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣄⣠⣴⣿⣷⣭⣻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠸⠿⣿⣿⣿⠋⣴⡟⠋⠈⠻⠿⠿⠛⠛⠛⠛⠛⠃⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⡁⠈⠉⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⣤⡄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠈⠄⠈⠻⠿⠛⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⣠⣄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⣀⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⡀⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠉⠉⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⠐⠒⠒⠄⠄⠄⠄⠉⢸⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⢿⣦⣄⣠⣄⠛⠟⠃⣀⣀⡀⠄⠄⣀⣀⣀⣀⣀⣀⡀⢀⣰⣦⣼⣿⣿⡿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣿⠄⢰⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⢛⣥⣾⣟⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡆⠈⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⣧⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿

posted about 2 years ago

nah just you making accounts only to start creating threads just to rant

posted about 2 years ago

Registered December 4th

posted about 2 years ago

go to the youtube stream and roll back the time a bit

he really hard performed the whole 2nd half tho not just the last 2v1

posted about 2 years ago

go to the youtube stream and roll back the time a bit

he really hard performed the whole 2nd half tho not just the last 2v1

posted about 2 years ago

Riot should have taken action sooner, but there logic behind the round conversions were justified imo.

posted about 2 years ago

he was just giving them benefit of the doubt

posted about 2 years ago

just checked the post like you said

"Acend won two of those rounds"

Anyways, I don't think you understand how detrimental eco damage can be. Acend lost several potentially winnable rounds, whether it be 3 or 4. Either way, if Acend had won those potentially winnable rounds, there could have been up to 2 rounds where VK would have been forced into eco save and Acend would have had full rifle rounds.

posted about 2 years ago

Possibly, or maybe even hand the win outright to Acend for VK's exploit.

posted about 2 years ago

Didn't they say they won 2 rounds?
Still, assuming that you're correct, 3 potentially lost rounds (and if I really want to argue this, crucial information gathered which can lead to more precious picks on Acend players making them lose weapons and have worse eco regardless of if they won the round or not) is enough to justify flipping more than one round in favor of Acend on top of the flipped round losses.

posted about 2 years ago

Acend won 2 of those rounds and lost 4. Thus the 13-8 to 12-9 switch plus the round for economic damage for potentially 4 lost rounds.

posted about 2 years ago

the other 2 rounds were sort of related since the cam exploit was being used then too. It's just that Acend won those rounds and there was nothing to be flipped in favor of them. If VK had won those, those rounds would also theoretically have been flipped in favor of Acend.

posted about 2 years ago

Correction: VK won 4, lost 2

posted about 2 years ago

Acend lost 4 of those rounds, not 3.

"Rounds 13, 14, 15, 17, 19, and 20. Acend won two of those rounds"

Flipping those 4 lost rounds changes the score from 13-8 in favor of VK to 12-9 in favor of Acend as written in the article.

And yes, ofc they are trying to make one team reach 13 to determine a winner, thus where the economic impact of 4 potentially lost rounds comes to play.

Again, Riot should have handled it sooner, but there justification for how they flipped the score seems reasonable to me.

posted about 2 years ago

Riot definitely waited too long and handled the situation poorly.

Still, their argument in their logic behind reverting those specific rounds, such as accounting for the economic impact of six rounds and the cam giving crucial information even if Acend attacked B site are fair arguments for me.

posted about 2 years ago

Common Eutalyx W

posted about 2 years ago

couldn't have said it better myself lol

posted about 2 years ago

cringe

posted about 2 years ago
1 •• 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 •• 54