Deadpanmitten94
Country: United States
Registered: August 4, 2021
Last post: September 25, 2023 at 2:51 PM
Posts: 819
1 •• 12 13 14 15 16

Get him out please for the love of all things left that are still good

posted about 2 years ago

They have won 12/35 pistol rounds in vct so far. Some things could have been much different if they had won some more pistol rounds. Unbelievable.

posted about 2 years ago

I’m just waiting for an iteration of 100t without Hiko. I know a lot of people hate on hiko, but it is genuinely time for him to go. Stani, Bang, Ethan, Asuna, and some other good player could actually be a pretty tight team that performs well given a little time. I don’t think they’ll have enough time to pull it together for this tourney but considering the amount of time every other team has had together, 100t still has a decent chance in the future.

posted about 2 years ago

The Thin Red Line might be my favorite war movie of all time and possibly what I think is objectively the best. It’s in my top four movies ever.

posted about 2 years ago

It is one of the most brutal films I’ve ever seen. Its depiction of the horror is incredible.

posted about 2 years ago

It was weird at first but now it just works for me I guess. And apparently the gun model being opposite your dominant eye makes it so your eye focuses on the gun model less which I definitely have noticed.

posted about 2 years ago

Facts I started typing out a whole ass response but then gave up cause it’s pointless if someone really believes what this guy says is true

posted about 2 years ago

That’s entirely 100% not true and definitely not an absolute. What about someone like TenZ when he was on c9, someone like vanity when he was on v1, someone like YaBoiDre when he was on LG, someone like Marved when he was on FaZe, someone like Yay when he was on Andbox.
Yes they have a team but all of them were looking for other options and if 100t is looking to get players of that caliber they can’t treat their players like this.

posted about 2 years ago

get off his peen

posted about 2 years ago

Right here :)

posted about 2 years ago

Still bad

posted about 2 years ago

Young talent will seize at the opportunity but established talent will not

posted about 2 years ago

2v5 w both LG players at 10 hp and somehow lose causing a spiral of eco that would’ve given 100t a 6-2 lead

posted about 2 years ago

It is certainly sad but at the end of the day this is one week of this current roster so maybe the rest of the year will be better lol

posted about 2 years ago

fr i think there’s about a thousand viper mains out there that play that viper ult better like holy hell

posted about 2 years ago

…..

posted about 2 years ago

When Asuna plays bad he’s still 100x more valuable than Hiko. Notice I said valuable as I’m not comparing k/d. Hiko just doesn’t provide value inside the server. And that’s where the value really matters.

posted about 2 years ago

It’s definitely tough but at this point some young talent might be more valuable than hiko cause hiko is just mechanically so far behind everyone else right now.

posted about 2 years ago

Yeah if they had dropped hiko picked up bang and stani and babyj when they were rebuilding 3 months ago I’d bet they could be pretty dang strong. And like right now they’re not doing terrible considering they’ve had a week together but what could have been if they weren’t so determined on keeping hiko.

posted about 2 years ago

I think I bigger issue than players being hurt by 100T this one time is the future of players being hesitant to join 100T in the future if there’s a risk they’ll get dropped that heartlessly.

posted about 2 years ago

Okay Hiko is just straight up brain dead now. Like homie walks all the way up to elbow to shoot a molly. like can he not just shoot the molly from where he was?? Like he put himself in so much danger and ended up dying and losing the round cause he’s brain dead. Like can home boy be replaced soon? He should genuinely be done playing. He is consistently not valuable way more than the 1:20 rounds they need him to clutch. Like holy there’s no way he brings that much to the team atmosphere. Get him out please.

posted about 2 years ago

They should just say fuck it and make a six man roster

posted about 2 years ago

Is the rule about maintaining a core 3 for the entire vct tournament or just each individual tournament? For example is 100T able to drop hiko (not that they will) after this current challengers is over or only after the year is over?

posted about 2 years ago

I think the coaching staff is holding Asuna back too much. I think back to 100t vs v1 and then 100t in berlin and they started winning when they just let Asuna tear into site. He didn’t always get a ton of frags on site but he rarely failed to get the space the team needed to secure a plant. Like when they just played the guard on ascent completely took away asuna’s ability to entry and make space. And they didn’t win a single round. Like huh? You let asuna free I guarantee he wins at least one round just by fragging out with a little support behind him. I understand 100t likes to think of themselves as super strategical but when you’ve got a player like asuna sometimes you just gotta let the beast loose.
Idk. I think they’re trying to force him to a certain play style that doesn’t utilize his full potential.
At this point i’m just an Asuna and Ethan fan. Wherever they go that will be my favorite team. But for now, I think it might be time to hop back to my team from my cs days and go back to c9. We’ll see.

posted about 2 years ago

wonderpeen wonderpeen wonderpeen

posted about 2 years ago

Yeah this wonderpeen kid is dumb af. Asuna performed better than any other NA duelist against the two top EMEA teams on his first LAN at 18 years old. He performed better than Yay against Gambit and Asuna had only been playing jett for like 3 months whereas Yay had been ONLY playing jett. Yay still cracked but Asuna is not overhyped and deserves recognition as a top NA duelist.

posted about 2 years ago

Bruh you must be like 14 years old to think that Myth watching the game was the reason the game gained attraction. “No tournaments were getting over like 10k viewers”. That’s because the game just came out dumb dumb. Overwatch and csgo didn’t get that many viewers it’s first minor invitational unsponsored tournaments and they are two of the top fps games in the scene. The game had attraction before it came out. When games that have huge esports potential come out, watch parties are part of the evolution of the game’s popularity. This can’t be attributed to any one person. It’s like saying fortnite would have never been popular if Ninja hadn’t streamed it. Like what? You’re trying to connect A to B but A and B aren’t connected at all. There were much bigger streamers than Myth playing valorant at the beginning. You’re just too busy sucking tsm off to realize that Myth was relevant for first strike and that was it.

posted about 2 years ago

Stop riding his peen and then once it’s out of your ass come back and we’ll still call you a dumb sht

posted about 2 years ago

Not excusing the coaching typing in chat, but wardell will say anything at this point to make it seem like he isn’t the absolute dogwater player he is

posted about 2 years ago

I agree. So change your argument from current results. Because the fact of the matter is beating someone by one place is still one place higher. So stop being a illogical dipshit.

posted about 2 years ago

But their strata were revealed in the first two series whereas none of rise’s strats were revealed.

posted about 2 years ago

Yeah this guy is tweakin

posted about 2 years ago

And getting 3-4 by beating the top 2 eu teams was bigger than an lcq. Follow your own logic.

posted about 2 years ago

But they didn’t sooooo based off current results

posted about 2 years ago

But you said current results. And current results c9 finished higher than NV. Therefore based off current results, c9>NV. Not based off current results I agree NV>c9. But you gotta pick an argument here. Are you going off current results or not? You keep flip-flopping. Choose.

posted about 2 years ago

Did you read anything i said you h0e. Vods of rise ~0. Vods of 100t >10.
So no actually. You’re wrong. Everyone was not in the same shoes. Because not everyone had played in the tournament yet. Only half the teams had.

posted about 2 years ago

You are mentally incapable of seeing logic

posted about 2 years ago

that’s a lot of ifs for someone claiming to be going off of current results so stop riding yourself

posted about 2 years ago

Bro in case you didn’t watch the tournament kru got 3-4 so the argument of sen losing to a bad team is legitimately dumb as shit

posted about 2 years ago

I thought you said based on current results lmfao cringe ass

posted about 2 years ago

I think you forget about how fucked up the tournament was. 100t had already played played 2 series when riot shat themselves by having the tourney in cali and delayed it for over 2 weeks. So in other words rise had 2 weeks to prep for 100t specifically when 100t had next to no vods of rise to prepare for.
I’m not inherently saying that 100t would have beat rise had the tourney not been delayed but 100t would have beaten them. It would be ignorant to say that 100t wasn’t put at a MAJOR disadvantage by delaying the tournament for that long. c9 prob still takes it either way but 100t still got boned.

posted about 2 years ago

I say that because you were talking like what you were saying is fact. But we literally haven’t seen either current roster play online or lan so how tf could you put either team above the other based off of the current roster when we have no clue what either will look like. Like you know absolutely nothing about how either roster will perform except based on past performance. And past performance puts 100t above xset.

posted about 2 years ago

Nah you wrong. Based on current results 100t was still better than rise. Rise had one good online tournament the whole damn year. So right now we don’t know enough about 100t to say they’d be better but based off current results? 100t still better than rise.

posted about 2 years ago

Based off current roster? maybe. But 100t outperformed xset in every way last year. Even online.

posted about 2 years ago

Maybe now but sure as hell weren’t better than 100T last year. Name one masters event xset attended. 100T is 3-1 for series against xset as well as the only NA team of last year to beat the top 2 EU teams. Obviously they are going from last years performances because that’s all they have to go on. Xset might very well be better than 100t this year but they sure weren’t last year. And rise had 1 good run in lcq last year and literally nothing else.

posted about 2 years ago

Uh, riot controls all of it so NA ain’t following anything but riots plans

posted about 2 years ago

Love the guy, hope he does well

posted about 2 years ago

A ridiculous amount of people in this thread clearly have never watched Nitr0 play a single game of valorant. He was clearly one of the best controllers in NA and his game sense was one of the best in the game. You can’t find that in young players because they don’t have the experience. Every now and then you get a young player who has that talent. But losing Nitr0 is no small thing. Of course because valorant is so young it will recover somewhat quickly but for rising controller players Nitr0 was an incredible example that can’t just be replaced.

posted about 2 years ago

He already was one of the best. But if he’s not enjoying playing 40 matches a year you can’t blame him when he’s already had an incredibly successful career.

posted about 2 years ago
1 •• 12 13 14 15 16