masters > champs

View:
Threaded
Linear
Threaded
#1
riensluvr
0
Frags
+

masters teams are relevant but champs teams are washed bums that were good 9 months prior

#2
camefentran
5
Frags
+

L take once again

#4
riensluvr
0
Frags
+

how is it an L take

#5
camefentran
4
Frags
+

cuz champs > masters youre mad cuz 2-3 edg

#8
riensluvr
0
Frags
+

but what about 2-3 geng this isn’t a heretics thing if it was i’d be glazing ewc

#3
delighted
0
Frags
+

I would've agreed with this if TS weren't qualifying for it

#6
frxme
0
Frags
+

i can see it but we as nrg are always good

#7
leftandright
0
Frags
+

good thing heretics won neither!

#9
Torinoni
0
Frags
+

Not true lol, both Champs winners have remained relevant and master winners have disappeared. Some examples:

  1. Masters Reykjavik 2021(SEN): After winning in Iceland Sentinels went on to have disappointing performances in both international events that followed that year (hey at least they did well locally).

  2. Champs Istanbul 2022 (LOUD): Ok cmon, it was loud 2022 do i really gotta show what they did after champs?

  3. Masters Madrid 2024 (SEN): Didn't even qualify to the next masters and then had a just decent run at champs. Looked shaky even in their own region.

  4. Masters Shanghai 2024 (GENG): Showed dominance in their region but that all came to nothing in champs and then didn't even qualify for the next Masters.

  5. Champs Seoul 2024 (EDG(Debatable)): Did quite a good run in the next Masters event but then barely missed qualifying for the second masters of 2025 so id put this as a 50/50.

Conclusion (IMO), Both International events are quite equal but Champs gets the edge in levels of difficulty due to its bigger team pool.

#10
Torinoni
0
Frags
+

This is until 2024 cuz I got tired of researching other examples.

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment