AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
https://i.ibb.co/B5bDVPKq/image-1777948730947.png imagine ur goat being sandwiched between x0pp0 and t0x
https://i.ibb.co/B5bDVPKq/image-1777948730947.png imagine ur goat being sandwiched between x0pp0 and t0x
whenever london starts that will change, have fun watching Less obliterate NRG again if they even make playoffs
https://www.vlr.gg/645484/nrg-vs-kr-esports-vct-2026-americas-stage-1-w2
he has exactly the same amount of titles as skuba while being in the circuit for three times as long
we cannot be talking about being sandwiched when this legendary sandwich exists
being below Boo is diabolical
acting like stats while on VIT matter at all that team could make alfajer and aspas average
You will not find a bigger Xeppaa hater than me, but he is the definition of a mid player. Mid utility, mid fragging, and mid in vlr ratings. Boo, even in his best run domestically, has never been above average fragging wise. I guarentee you Xeppaa has better ratings, acs, etc. than Boo, even though Boo is obviously the better player considering he's the igl.
xeppa is not a mid player hes a bad one. and of course he does he just plays group stages. not even comparable boo is a bum and is miles above him
In sports culture, fans, commentators and participants have engaged in discussions regarding a sport's greatest of all time, often referred to by the abbreviation GOAT. The origins of the term as an acronym with positive connotations is often credited to the mid-20th century boxer Muhammad Ali. Its ubiquitous usage in sports conversations and debates was popularized in the 21st century.
The assessment of players as the greatest in a sport is often made by sportswriters and other members of the media based on differing criteria. Both objective measures, such as statistics and championships, as well as subjective commentary regarding an athlete's intangible traits are often considered. Sportswriters have noted issues with GOAT debates, including recency bias, as well as the improvement of nutrition and training over time, which some view as making it a challenge to compare players across eras. Many sports have no consensus for their single greatest all-time player. Cross-sport discussions have been held, also to no consensus. The assessment of a woman as a sport's greatest athlete or inclusion in cross-sports commentary as an all-time singular greatest athlete has been discussed.
Players themselves have also commented on GOAT conversations. Some have proclaimed themselves or a favorite player the GOAT; some refuse to include themselves in such conversations, highlighting other players' or their team's accomplishments; some dismiss the topic as misguided, foolish, or premature (for active players). When GOAT discussions happen, particularly online and in places with shareable images, imagery of goats (the animal) are often used.