3

congrats rito

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
Effluxi

for finding whole new way to make masters 1 a mickey despite adding 4 more teams and fixing format

#2
sentinelmain377
-1
Frags
+

fr

still one issue with the format though. the 4 playoffs teams get to decide their group match-up in the order of a luck-based draw. rigged

#19
OkOkay
-8
Frags
+

its a mickey tournament because bbl is in it not because the format.

#20
Effluxi
0
Frags
+

0/8

#23
OkOkay
-4
Frags
+

all jokes aside why is emea crying so much. losing and crying is just such a disgusting combo. I have pity for them

#28
Effluxi
0
Frags
+

one team out of 3 dropped bro relax

#34
OkOkay
-1
Frags
+

look at ur past 10 posts. you are legit a perfect example. I feel sooo bad for you. May your brain recover 🙏🙏🥹🥹

#40
Germy
2
Frags
+

bbl is gonna be the best team of the year

#3
Clucker
0
Frags
+

The way yall would switch up if emea was winning tdy instead

#4
sentinelmain377
-9
Frags
+

emea is winning this tournament (I got no doubt in my mind). BBL vs M8 is the finals

#6
Dymerr
2
Frags
+

so when they win its still gonna be mickey right?

#12
sentinelmain377
-7
Frags
+

ye pretty mickey (unless BBL wins even with like 3rd or 4th in draw order)

#13
Dymerr
0
Frags
+

thats crazy the only tournament you think they can manage to win is one that doesnt matter

#24
sentinelmain377
-10
Frags
+

Tournaments & if they are mickey mouse or not:

  1. Reykjavik 2021: Valid 🟩
  2. Berlin 2021: Valid 🟩
  3. Champs 2021: Valid 🟩
  4. Reykjavik 2022: Mickey 🟥 (no FPX, no full FNATIC)
  5. Copenhagen 2022: Valid 🟩
  6. Champs 2022: Valid 🟩
  7. LOCK//IN 2023: Valid 🟩
  8. Tokyo 2023: Valid 🟩
  9. Champs 2023: Valid 🟩
  10. Madrid 2024: Mickey 🟥(Kickoff flukers)
  11. Shanghai 2024: Valid 🟩 (luck-based draw for playoffs (FNATIC 4th). Didnt really matter)
  12. Champs 2024: Valid 🟩
  13. Bangkok 2025: Mickey 🟥(Kickoff flukers)
  14. Toronto 2025: Mickey 🟥(luck-based draw for playoffs (FNATIC 4th again). This time it mattered)
  15. EWC 2025: Valid 🟩
  16. Paris 2025: Valid 🟩
  17. Santiago 2026: probably Mickey🟥(luck-based draw for playoffs)
#25
Dymerr
-3
Frags
+
  1. LOCK//IN 2023: Mickey (single elimination, not a real masters)
#27
sentinelmain377
-6
Frags
+

only reason LOCK//IN isnt a fluke is cuz FNATIC proved themselves the next tournament (this is unlike Madrid & Bangkok where SEN and T1 fell off right after)

otherwise it would be a mickey

#29
Dymerr
-1
Frags
+

every single elim tourney mickey.

#31
sentinelmain377
-7
Frags
+

every single elim finals is more valid than all double elim finals cuz double elim finals have 2 map ban (rigged finals)
double are more mickey than single

if ur gonna call single elim tourneys mickey, then all tournaments are mickey

#44
jawn
0
Frags
+

so champs 2024 didn't happen

#50
sentinelmain377
-7
Frags
+

edg got 3rd in bangkok
pretty good

if ur talking about SEN getting 4th at champs, it was just wayyy later

#26
aiber
2
Frags
+

tokyo fluke no full prx
lockin fluke not a masters

#36
mojhito5
0
Frags
+

wtf is a luck-based draw? every draw ever is luck-based no?

#37
sentinelmain377
-7
Frags
+

not before 2024

it used to be 1st seeds from groups play against PAC/CN(orSouthAmerica) playoffs teams and 2nd seeds from groups play against AMER(orNA)/EMEA playoff teams.

AMERICAS and EMEA were objectively better regions back then

#15
Effluxi
0
Frags
+

arguable but probably. they did come in via 1st seed bye and 5/8 teams are actually competent. if they face like, AG or FUR definitely a mickey but otherwise it's just a fancy old school masters 1 with better qualification

#11
OkOkay
-1
Frags
+

STATS:
Americas: 3 Champs
EMEA: 1 Champs
China : 1 Champs
APAC: 0 Champs

#5
Effluxi
0
Frags
+

emea is winning it, ex pcfic roster is best thing since sliced bread. or rice.

#10
SleepingSnorlax
0
Frags
+

Emea is no doubt going on a longer run with BBL and M8

#7
OkOkay
0
Frags
+

STATS:
Americas: 3 Champs
EMEA: 1 Champs
China : 1 Champs
APAC: 0 Champs

#8
aiber
2
Frags
+

game changing updates always happen near the end of the year so its only natural that the first masters is everyone trynna figure out the meta and just using firepower to plough through it

#14
jawn
-2
Frags
+

this is not what happened the last two masters 1

#16
Effluxi
0
Frags
+

tf you mean thats exactly what happened with tejo vs T1 antimeta

#21
jawn
-1
Frags
+

that's an exception not the rule

#30
Effluxi
0
Frags
+

you can't say "last 2" and then go "uh actually 50% of the sample is an exception not the rule" bro what rule

#42
jawn
-1
Frags
+

how is t1 50% of the sample when it's just one of the two teams that didn't opt in the tejo meta and the only one that opted for double duelist instead

#46
Effluxi
0
Frags
+

dude they won the event from lowers because of it like what

#48
jawn
-1
Frags
+

you don't seem to understand what was being discussed

#51
Effluxi
0
Frags
+

No, you're gaslighting. It was about firepower winning masters 1 over strats. Their "strats" were firepower over strats lmao

#17
aiber
0
Frags
+

people figuring out tejo meta
t1 won by just killing everyone

zekken shits on everyone in madrid once again firepower

#22
jawn
-1
Frags
+

yeah it definitely wasn't sentinels being the best retake team in a retake meta

#32
Effluxi
1
Frags
+

retake meta that was developing bro you are literally digging your own argument a grave

#43
jawn
-1
Frags
+

what the fuck are you talking about?

#47
Effluxi
0
Frags
+

single team that lucks into having closest read to meta when building team before meta even materialises wins masters 1. Sen and T1.

#49
jawn
-1
Frags
+

so they didn't win by using firepower to plough through meta uncertainty, they instead defined the meta, welcome to my point jackass

#9
n0sey
0
Frags
+

Why are you blaming riot when the ones who wanted less utility were the pros and even ranked players lmao? 🤣🤣🤣

Enjoy what you wanted

#18
Effluxi
3
Frags
+

"Pros" like t0nz and fenis. only retired bums and bandwagoners that have changed their minds

#52
delighted
-6
Frags
+

AN ACTUAL FUCKING JOKE

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment