t1 would be more of a superteam if buzz and stax didn't shit the bed for over half the year and ruin their stock over the past 2 years (stax basically missed out on every international in 2024, buzz made it to only 1, both had never reached an international grand final until bangkok, both fell off immediately after - especially buzz, who looked awful at champs 25)
as it stands t1 has 3 players who are top 5/top 3 in their role in pacific (izu, munch, meteor) and 2 players who are top 5 in their role in the world (meteor, munch)
vitality has the biggest prospect in emea (sayonara), a two time trophy winner that is arguably top 5 in their role in the world and definitely top 3 in emea, and profek&jamppi are top 5 players in their role in emea (cmiiw). also they have a goat contender in chronicle.
meteor and munchkin are the only people in t1 to have made more than 1 final, whereas chronicle and derke have made it to a combined 6 (berlin, berlin, sao paulo, tokyo, toronto, champs 25)
i feel like there is a plausible star power difference between vitality and t1 that makes t1 less of a "superteam" than vitality.
not saying i disagree but these could be the defining differences between the two. also i don't like calling t1 a superteam because the hype and pressure that such a name would bring to them would be too high.