Hey guys,
I have explained the struggles of 100T in this video and also potential available players which can make 100T look so much better
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Qdw4PR9qmp4
How 100T can actually win?
posted in
Valorant Discussion
Be honest, did you have ChatGPT write the script?
A lot of this video is you just saying bullshit to extend the viewtime. "When you can win duels, it opens up so many tactical options..." yea no shit. "That's the kind of individual skill that wins championships..." Yea I'm sure bud.
Allat and you didn't even fix the biggest problem plaguing 100T: The Coaching
Appreciate the feedback 🙏 I get what you’re saying, but when I mentioned winning duels opening up options, it wasn’t just filler — top IGLs like FNS (about yay), Boostio (about Demon1), and Ange1 (about Cned) have all talked about the same thing. Having someone like Demon1 with raw aim gives you firepower that lets the team play way looser without relying on utility.
Would love to hear your thoughts on what type of breakdowns you’d prefer though — more team/coach focus or more round-by-round tactical stuff? Helps me improve the next vid
The 3 signs I look for in AI-generated responses:
- Em-dashes: you have two in your response
- "It's not just X, it's Y": extremely common in AI, you have it when you say "it wasn't just filler"
- Groups of 3 (or 5): while not a dead giveaway, AI loves odd-numbered groups, like your "FNS, Boostio, Ange1" list.
If anyone here wants to learn more about detecting AI here's the video I got this from:
https://youtu.be/9Ch4a6ffPZY?si=Qbb54d76Z9Fjq6Hg
Put the fries in the bag bro. Also you clearly edited the AI response to make it seem non-AI so why didn't you remove the emdashes?
Really appreciate in you digging in my response. I am trying to Understand what is the problem here? Was my response not clear? Does it matter if we use AI or not? If it does then how?
Would you not prefer a clear understanding message?
Anyways i hope you have a good day and let me know if you have any feedback
well it depends on how much AI is used. maybe you just used it for translation or clarification, but usually it's people just generating the whole reply with GPT, in which case why am I even talking to you. Also it was relevant because the first comment asked you if the script was AI-generated, so the fact that your reply was AI-generated would make that much more likely
That makes sense.
However i work in corporate so i have gotten into a habit to write formal professional emails/replies. I do use AI for clarification and cutting to chase replies.
Really loved talking to you. And hope in my future content you can help as you sound someone who has a detail oriented eye.🙂
This is not AI’d
Discord