how does everyone feel about this rule? what would it be like if you could compete at 16, potentially less? would it be better or worse?
0
minimum age requirement
posted in
Valorant Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
As long as franchising exists there’s nothing that can be done about it whether u like it or not
i meant it in a "what if" type of way, like there is so much t2 talent that is wasted imo. for example imagine if cane/ion were able to join a t1 team. or if they win ascension they couldnt play.
16 is good cut off but immaturity issues make it not worth it especially when we already have immaturity issues cause of all the players are bums that don't go outside we don't to add hormones on top of that imo 18 with some wiggle room for 17 yr olds who are going to be 18 mid year or late year
yeah i agree w/ everything here. in another universe we have minimum age requirement of 16 and see fresh talent and no wasted potential
Discord