i see a lot of people say his mvp at bangkok was fraudulent but genuinely who else should've earned it then? leaf?
i see a lot of people say his mvp at bangkok was fraudulent but genuinely who else should've earned it then? leaf?
Izu. Overall best player of t1 for the whole event. But ig riot just gives mvp to the best player of finals nowadays.
Meteor deserved Shanghai mvp but texture got it for finals. So it's fine that meteor got Bangkok mvp for that.
nowadays 🥀🥀they only given 1 other mvp (to Kk) and it was also based on the final
I mean texture was Shanghai mvp over meteor too. Meteor was geng best player throughout that event and even in finals he was as good as texture but somehow he didn't get the mvp.
I know that but I saw many claim texture as mvp at that time so I thought there was some unofficial title given. Ig I am wrong.
For sure. If edg won Bangkok chichoo would clearly be the mvp unless kk got like 120 kills in finals. Chichoo was insane in Bangkok.
izu would've been my second pick but idk if i'm crazy for weighing that split game too highly
Well it's the same situation as chichoo or kk mvp in champs. Chichoo was better player overall in champs but kk was just too insane in finals so he got the mvp. But in Bangkok tbh at finals stax was as impactful as meteor.
Anyway why even care at this point. It's already past. Just watch the ucl. What a crazy game.