0

The more I think about it

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
nooomy

the more 100Ts issue is coaching.

This is a huge reach, and is purely based off of the fact that they don't change comps/stats/how they speak in interviews.

But I think that their main philosophy is to prioritse playing together and taking big messy teamfights, and while it sounds counterintuitive, I think that prioritising playing well together makes them play worse together.

I'm willing to guess that 100T has the least prep for each map out of any team in Americas (other than the bottom feeders). I'm guessing this for 3 reasons:

  1. Their retakes and post plants are consistently amongst the worst in the league
  2. their comps rarely change, even with a week in between games
  3. bang said in an interview that SEN had more of a winners mentality than 100T, which I guess means they don't get as much work done in a day, explaining the two above

This affects guys like Boostio and Zander because with no prep, they are forced to improvise ways to enable guys like Cryo or Asuna rather than having prepped strats.

This philosophy directly works against a guy like Boostio. He himself has said he is more of an instinctive caller, and forcing him to be a mini FNS, micromanaging his players more, takes away from his ability to play his own game. On EG, he had Potter, Zikz and a whole reserve roster, so I'd imagine he'd go into games with a great understanding of how the enemy team was going to play, then use guys like c0m and ethan to midround while he tapped heads or Oped.

Before 100Ts bind got figured out, it was so strong on the attack side because of the telegraphed execs. If you gave them B long, or A short, then they took site for free because they would util dump + Asunas pathing was optimal, then they would have rechargeable Gekko utility to help them keep the site.

Compare that to this year, and 100T have way less pre-coordinated rounds than last year, which means that they rely on their individual brilliance a lot more than winning because they outplayed their opponent. Im going to blame this on Mikes leaving, because I remember an sgares quote where he said that Mike was "the only guy who could make an esports player show up on time" and he really made their defence rounds better when on the team.

This being said, I really think a coaching change is needed for 100T. I dont know if that means that Zikz goes, or moves to AC, but I really think that they would be so stupid to not try for Bonkar, given that so many pros name him specifically as a really impactful, high level coach

TLDR: 100T bonkar

#2
Wezzaa
-1
Frags
+

Hello m4

#4
nooomy
0
Frags
+

A couple months ago, Zikz and 100T put out an open call for coaching.

https://100thieves.com/pages/100-thieves-valorant-open-enrollment-coaching-staff?srsltid=AfmBOoozUultxiPf82KRBYeB0Ullzjt8SPw0CW67s-ijq_JndFNmygPt

I spent 2 weeks putting a tremendous amount of time and effort to create these two analysis reports:

100T Icebox
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zYRtRbyClNjJXx-vbA2X6s64IlaVGfhV/view?usp=drive_link

FNC Haven
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kE90FXjCtj_qaXCOp-j0pInVEdqL1KEz/view?usp=drive_link

Despite the effort, despite reaching out to Zikz two weeks after the deadline for any word, I was ghosted. Only to find out that your average VCT scouting/analysis report is 1/200th the size.

The reason I'm bringing this up is because I'm tired of seeing Nadeshot and 100 Thieves continue the narrative that they are trying everything they can. They simply are not. They are just continuing the one thing that has plagued esports, cronyism. The normal size of an analysis report in VCT is 1-2 pages. For a game that is supposed to be "TACTICAL" ... how do you fit a scouting report into one page?

How does Nadeshot and the 100T organization pay for such mediocracy when people put real effort into their applications? Esports needs to stop being a revolving door.

#3
DBStudios
0
Frags
+

No, everytime Zikz called a timeout on Pearl it usually led to a win the next round, yet they still threw that map it's entirely on the players.

#5
nooomy
-1
Frags
+

1 map =/= their whole split

#7
DBStudios
0
Frags
+

That one map decided that entire split for them

#10
nooomy
-1
Frags
+

but these are issues that stayed with them the whole split, and will stop them from getting better for the future

#12
DBStudios
0
Frags
+

Zikz's timeouts are still really good, I would say at least 7/10 of the time when he calls one the next round is a 100T win. Now you're blaming the coach when Cryo can't play entry duelist and has to play sage, Asuna overheats after a single kill, Boostio can't even kill, and Zander has one life game then goes back to sleep. There are much more pressing matters at hand.

#14
nooomy
-1
Frags
+

Cryo doesnt need to play sage tho, they could copy Mibrs comp and put him on jett or have him play omen/astra. Its the coaches responsibility to make comp decisions

Asuna overheating? man, im sure a good coach would be able to get that tendency out of him, sgares managed it well.

Boostio and Zander? read the post man I explained why I think they might be underperforming.

Calling a few timeouts is cute and all but you only get two so unless you wanna get 13-2'd every game its really not as important as building a good system

#16
DBStudios
0
Frags
+

Asuna overheating? man, im sure a good coach would be able to get that tendency out of him, sgares managed it well.

That's just not even right lmao he was overheating even with sgares which is why they got knocked out at champs

Boostio and Zander? read the post man I explained why I think they might be underperforming.

Boostio was already underperforming during Shanghai which was 100T best performance ever and if you even watch the games zander has horrible decision making 60% of the time which leads to him dying early, also his aim hasn't been as good as his M80 days. A coach is not responsible if a player's aim is dog shit that is something they need to practice on their own.

#6
aquaa018s_alterego
0
Frags
+

They need more strats and help from the coaching staff like you said. They need to stop thinking about implementing strats not only with their current comps, but with different comps like maybe putting cryo on chamber on split. Im no coach so idk if that would be good or not. But they need to start thinking more. Like with sen and g2, Kaplan and JoshRT saw the navi comp, and well they both did pretty good on it

#9
nooomy
-1
Frags
+

I think a big issue for them is an unwillingness to copy other teams comps. Idk if it's because they dont watch other teams or are too stubborn to change their comps, but there's no way where a competent coaching team doesnt copy Mibr's split comp, SENs pearl comp or any breach/tejo comp on haven. It would save them so much time too, as they could fill out half a playbook by vod reviewing another team's map and taking some of their strats while adding their own

#8
Ripbozo2
0
Frags
+

bruh just drop boostio its not that hard i've been begging

#11
nooomy
0
Frags
+

and then what? Just get rid of your igl and vibes guy and call it a day?

#13
Ripbozo2
0
Frags
+

there's no vibes guy all I see is dead vibes lol, he's +0.01 kd better than FNS it's not a good look bro

#15
nooomy
0
Frags
+

bruh dropping your igl midseason when there are coaching issues is braindead asf tho, just change coaching systems and drop him at the end of the year when half of vct are free agents

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment