^title
I wouldn't call it a fluke, they were similar strength teams in kickoff and the loser wins rematches like 2/3 of the time in tier 1, I picked MIBR to win that at the time of it happening (i was high on furia so my pickems don't show that bc i had furia beating mibr).
G2 looked pretty good vs 100T, got 8 rounds on both maps.(more than i expected) Maybe I'm a bit high on 100T compared to the average person though.
I've just lost complete faith in redgar, until he proves something to me i'm going to assume GiantX will continue to flounder
G2 looked solid vs 100T (who is debatably top 11 ITW), ignore the EG game altogether except in relation to C9 (G2 > C9)
I was high on GiantX, but i've lost complete faith in redgar as an igl and player. There's been no good signs for them, the map they won vs FNC was FNC losing, not GiantX winning
Mibr didn't fall off, Kru is just that good
Koi vs Furia is a 50-50 game
u can rank C9 lower, still. the #1 and #2 are objectively americas teams.
Boaster said FNC always lose their map picks or something along those lines, GiantX won on FNC's map pick because FNC looked shit, FNC looked substantially better on the other 2 maps while GiantX only looked slightly worse.
Koi definitely works more coordinated, but furia has more firepower. It just depends
G2 looked competent against a very good 100T (maybe ur lower on 100T than I am), i'm not judging kickoff because they had 2 role switches (duelist Leaf -> icy, sentinel Net -> leaf) and vs EG is whatever, its EG, but they looked much better vs EG than C9 did
me when being delusion:
https://www.vlr.gg/247078/kr-esports-vs-giants-gaming-valorant-champions-2023-group-stage-elim-a