2-0 ACE
ACE
NAVI
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.47 0.84 2.41 | 295 180 468 | 22 8 14 | / 10 7 3 / | 0 0 0 | +12 +1 +11 | 75% 58% 100% | 162 100 256 | 26% 38% 19% | 6 1 5 | 2 2 0 | +4 -1 +5 | |
|
1.25 0.96 1.68 | 217 166 294 | 16 7 9 | / 10 7 3 / | 6 3 3 | +6 0 +6 | 85% 83% 88% | 136 118 163 | 23% 23% 22% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.93 0.92 0.95 | 177 208 133 | 12 8 4 | / 12 9 3 / | 4 3 1 | 0 -1 +1 | 80% 75% 88% | 121 141 92 | 32% 25% 50% | 4 4 0 | 0 0 0 | +4 +4 0 | |
|
0.78 0.87 0.65 | 157 195 102 | 10 7 3 | / 13 9 4 / | 3 3 0 | -3 -2 -1 | 70% 75% 63% | 110 132 78 | 19% 16% 25% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.71 0.69 0.75 | 168 113 252 | 13 5 8 | / 13 7 6 / | 4 3 1 | 0 -2 +2 | 60% 58% 63% | 86 70 109 | 19% 23% 16% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.97 0.67 1.17 | 155 123 177 | 11 3 8 | / 12 8 4 / | 3 2 1 | -1 -5 +4 | 60% 50% 67% | 99 97 101 | 30% 42% 20% | 2 0 2 | 3 2 1 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.96 0.72 1.11 | 209 190 222 | 13 5 8 | / 16 7 9 / | 6 0 6 | -3 -2 -1 | 65% 63% 67% | 131 114 143 | 30% 45% 25% | 1 0 1 | 4 3 1 | -3 -3 0 | |
|
0.93 0.76 1.05 | 171 145 189 | 10 3 7 | / 15 9 6 / | 6 3 3 | -5 -6 +1 | 65% 75% 58% | 142 108 164 | 24% 17% 27% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.83 0.42 1.10 | 165 175 159 | 10 4 6 | / 13 8 5 / | 3 1 2 | -3 -4 +1 | 60% 38% 75% | 103 87 114 | 17% 23% 14% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.71 0.41 0.90 | 177 109 223 | 14 4 10 | / 17 9 8 / | 5 3 2 | -3 -5 +2 | 60% 50% 67% | 101 43 139 | 27% 10% 33% | 1 1 0 | 6 2 4 | -5 -1 -4 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.98 1.66 1.30 | 273 229 314 | 50 23 27 | / 32 19 13 / | 7 3 4 | +18 +4 +14 | 71% 54% 92% | 153 134 176 | 21% 22% 20% | 9 2 7 | 6 5 1 | +3 -3 +6 | |
|
0.76 1.43 1.07 | 222 179 274 | 39 16 23 | / 36 22 14 / | 13 7 6 | +3 -6 +9 | 75% 75% 75% | 140 126 157 | 21% 19% 22% | 5 1 4 | 7 6 1 | -2 -5 +3 | |
|
1.09 0.93 1.02 | 203 228 186 | 37 20 17 | / 37 20 17 / | 14 10 4 | 0 0 0 | 75% 71% 79% | 143 166 115 | 31% 30% 31% | 8 5 3 | 3 1 2 | +5 +4 +1 | |
|
1.12 0.91 1.02 | 206 214 216 | 43 25 18 | / 34 16 18 / | 8 6 2 | +9 +9 0 | 69% 71% 67% | 118 123 112 | 27% 34% 21% | 3 2 1 | 6 2 4 | -3 0 -3 | |
|
0.98 0.61 0.81 | 170 217 122 | 29 20 9 | / 36 20 16 / | 11 4 7 | -7 0 -7 | 65% 68% 63% | 121 151 86 | 27% 25% 30% | 1 1 0 | 4 3 1 | -3 -2 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.09 1.23 1.17 | 218 222 242 | 41 18 23 | / 35 18 17 / | 17 10 7 | +6 0 +6 | 75% 75% 75% | 160 152 167 | 36% 33% 40% | 4 0 4 | 3 2 1 | +1 -2 +3 | |
|
0.85 1.16 1.02 | 242 232 265 | 43 19 24 | / 44 20 24 / | 10 1 9 | -1 -1 0 | 65% 58% 71% | 152 137 166 | 27% 34% 22% | 15 7 8 | 11 8 3 | +4 -1 +5 | |
|
0.66 1.13 0.91 | 159 112 195 | 29 9 20 | / 35 19 16 / | 9 5 4 | -6 -10 +4 | 63% 67% 61% | 113 73 147 | 22% 18% 25% | 2 0 2 | 3 1 2 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.62 0.83 0.73 | 173 169 180 | 27 12 15 | / 41 20 21 / | 13 5 8 | -14 -8 -6 | 60% 50% 68% | 120 108 131 | 10% 9% 11% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.91 0.57 0.73 | 175 207 148 | 35 20 15 | / 43 21 22 / | 12 8 4 | -8 -1 -7 | 60% 63% 57% | 106 118 95 | 19% 11% 33% | 4 2 2 | 9 4 5 | -5 -2 -3 |
ACE
NAVI
ACE
NAVI
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.22 1.45 0.98 | 243 289 198 | 30 20 10 | / 21 9 12 / | 4 3 1 | +9 +11 -2 | 75% 81% 69% | 138 163 113 | 32% 38% 24% | 1 1 0 | 4 1 3 | -3 0 -3 | |
|
1.19 1.08 1.29 | 251 266 236 | 28 15 13 | / 22 12 10 / | 7 3 4 | +6 +3 +3 | 69% 50% 88% | 148 159 136 | 18% 16% 20% | 3 1 2 | 4 3 1 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
1.07 1.22 0.93 | 228 244 213 | 25 12 13 | / 25 11 14 / | 10 7 3 | 0 +1 -1 | 72% 69% 75% | 156 185 127 | 30% 33% 26% | 4 1 3 | 3 1 2 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.96 0.61 1.30 | 226 188 264 | 23 9 14 | / 26 15 11 / | 7 4 3 | -3 -6 +3 | 69% 69% 69% | 143 131 155 | 20% 18% 22% | 3 0 3 | 7 6 1 | -4 -6 +2 | |
|
0.83 1.07 0.60 | 182 234 131 | 19 13 6 | / 23 11 12 / | 8 1 7 | -4 +2 -6 | 63% 63% 63% | 128 165 91 | 33% 33% 33% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.29 1.31 1.28 | 281 272 291 | 30 15 15 | / 23 10 13 / | 14 8 6 | +7 +5 +2 | 84% 88% 81% | 198 180 217 | 39% 29% 50% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.06 0.92 1.19 | 274 253 296 | 30 14 16 | / 28 13 15 / | 4 1 3 | +2 +1 +1 | 66% 56% 75% | 166 148 183 | 25% 31% 20% | 14 7 7 | 7 5 2 | +7 +2 +5 | |
|
0.90 0.62 1.19 | 146 95 199 | 19 6 13 | / 20 10 10 / | 3 2 1 | -1 -4 +3 | 63% 63% 63% | 95 56 134 | 22% 19% 23% | 2 0 2 | 1 1 0 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.75 1.17 0.33 | 173 256 92 | 21 16 5 | / 26 12 14 / | 7 5 2 | -5 +4 -9 | 59% 69% 50% | 109 156 62 | 15% 11% 31% | 3 1 2 | 3 2 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.67 0.72 0.62 | 180 165 195 | 17 8 9 | / 28 12 16 / | 10 4 6 | -11 -4 -7 | 59% 56% 63% | 131 118 143 | 7% 5% 9% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 |
Probably Acend vs TL, I think Acend win 2-0
EDIT: Was an obvious prediction, never expected that upset. But Acend still win with Cned going nuts
i can see liquid maybe winning if they pull out some random comp like they did vs fpx
Liquid 2-0 Acend or Acend 2-1 Liquid
CNED has an off day Liquid will stomp them if they play the same way they play against Giants and now they have +10 days to practice with Jamppi as IGL he just switched I expect a high improvement + they all switched to comfort picks that's a bonus in the mental .
I might be wrong but this my take
acend is not just cned
we hve starxo we have zeek
we have bonecold and kiles
every single one of them is a beast on a good day
"we"
Don't take it so personal lmao. That's what leads to fanaticism.
If they all go to different teams are you still "we"?
How do you beat liquid when you can't even beat the gambit? A newer team I don't think they can beat the top teams for now
TL 2-0 ACE, Acend players just hit bullets, they really dont understand the game, maybe they can win the most of the clutches but in team play there is too much difference
how is a noname the best valorant player in EU? how come this guy never played in a tier 1 game in a team before? meanwhile csgo legends suck at csgo while the best valorant player sucked at csgo so hard he played a cringe custom cs ripoff game called "ZULA". how tf is a noname so good in this game and cs legends who should be dominating since they have 10 years of experience with this mechanics already suck so hard? im calling it, cned is a cheater and also his teammates are nonames and have no real background and know every shit. yea makes sense! just google for smartphone hacks. i predict this guy has some hacks and hes hiding it by not using a cam!
Some people had to be replaced by new people, are you waiting for cs professionals to come and be the best here? Besides, what kind of career can he have at the age of 19?
It is very weird, I would like you to ascend classify and that I can see them in LAN
What this shitty team? Valorant is irrelevant to me but I only come to see the navi games, I guess he loses this from what I see
Navi is like the worst team out all the qualified ones but they managed to upset Choquid
I see, there is nothing else to do here, although they beat liquid, it is a bit of merit for a new team I guess
I don't think we know enough about Navi to say they're the "worst team out all the qualified ones," tbh. You're basing your statement on very little information to make a silly joke about "Choquid."
"Choquid" is a "joke" that has been running for years, I didn't invent it and if there was a time to use it, yesterday was it.
You don't know my info so I think that's the only baseless assumption here. NaVi alongside ForZe were the weakest teams on PR and OS. I think we have more than sufficient info out there. Also not that it matters but these guys have been pretty known since the Beta and they already faced each other.
Have a good one
Navi did big surprize for me by beating liquid. But Acend is different so I think Acend is going to win 2-0 ez
Ok, NaVi beat Liquid, but it was a close game. What's stopping Acend from slapping a team, that is closely matched with Liquid?
I don't think rock paper scissors logic really applies to this game xD
But yeah Acend should demolish NaVi
I'm asking you what's the symmetry breaker. Not saying, that matchups follow logically.
Grand final will be Acend vs FPX or Acend vs Gambit. As a result, Acend will demolish NaVi for sure.
it depends on how good the lurker is on t side, otherwise its mostly ct sided
Same thing goes for FF aswell lol xd
its about experience and timing at some point.
and i didnt see navi trying tactics on t side they went one by one
Did the casters just said in OT that the res come through to bring that weapon with them? I like it. :D
both teams play great, GGWP.
people should put some respect on NaVi. especially ssk and Cloud