Wait... last masters they lost to prx and optic... surely that means they weren't as bad as they seemed
Wait... last masters they lost to prx and optic... surely that means they weren't as bad as they seemed
༼ つ ◕◕ ༽つ PRX take my energy ༼ つ ◕◕ ༽つ༼ つ ◕◕ ༽つ PRX take my energy ༼ つ ◕◕ ༽つ༼ つ ◕◕ ༽つ PRX take my energy ༼ つ ◕◕ ༽つ༼ つ ◕◕ ༽つ PRX take my energy ༼ つ ◕◕ ༽つ༼ つ ◕◕ ༽つ PRX take my energy ༼ つ ◕◕ ༽つ༼ つ ◕◕ ༽つ PRX take my energy ༼ つ ◕◕ ༽つ༼ つ ◕◕ ༽つ PRX take my energy ༼ つ ◕◕ ༽つ༼ つ ◕◕ ༽つ PRX take my energy ༼ つ ◕◕ ༽つ
I think they did better than XSHIT :)). They had close game againts Optic also
That's a fact except another fact says they lost to tier 2 teams and win 1 game only at group stage
It was their first lan for a lot of the players so that definitely was a factor. They wrre very good but they tried to adapt to the current meta which kinda screwed them this stage
Your argument equates PRX's current from to their previous from in Iceland, which is an assumption that is not true because patches and player's performance change over time. Hence, your argument is false