0

NA vs EU

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
Neeraj

Looking at the recent performance of NA and EU teams at Challengers , its quite clear that NA teams are improving at a very fast pace
c9 is still at the top , but sharing its spot with V1 and Guards (arguably) , maybe even Optic
While EU on the other hand looks very shaky
Liquid trash comps , Gambit unfortunate scenario , G2 struggling and acend losing maps to teams like G2
Fnatic new lineup etc etc

What are your takes on EU vs NA in Masters 1?

#2
Arisqq
9
Frags
+

EU wins ez NA at evrey game KEKW

#3
ukitlol
1
Frags
+

At masters I predict that NA gets through groups easily and EU struggles but gets through eventually, But then in playoffs EU wakes up and we see a repeat of champs.

#4
Carthage_Er_Pola
0
Frags
+

Honestly the whole russia ukraine thing severely nerfed EU

#5
nikoko07
19
Frags
+

winning emea challengers is harder than winning worlds lmao

#6
Acro_
14
Frags
+

So if weak NA teams are now competing with strong NA teams theyre considered "improving", but if weak EU teams are now competing with strong EU teams the strong teams are considered shaky? not even a nice try tbh 0/8

#7
TuNyyy
0
Frags
+

NA puts a better fight, EU still win

#8
ConsistentCycles
3
Frags
+

EU usually tries alot of stuff out regionally. teams like gambit look shaky in groups but then show up when it matters and liquid will use terrible comps and then pull out the real stuff internationally. but in this case with the russia ukraine stuff emea is going to be heavily nerfed

#9
Kiklop
7
Frags
+
ukitlol [#3]

At masters I predict that NA gets through groups easily and EU struggles but gets through eventually, But then in playoffs EU wakes up and we see a repeat of champs.

Somehow i missed that on camps NA got trought groups easly KEKW

#10
BoF7ooM
4
Frags
+

It is the same thing dude 💀. EU teams are also imrpoving and competing with the best. Infact using your same sentence I can make one for NA and maybe youll understand how dumb this take was:
Looking at the recent performance of NA and EU teams at Challengers , its quite clear that EU teams are improving at a very fast pace
Acend is still at the top , but sharing its spot with Gambit and Guild (arguably) , maybe even FPX
While NA on the other hand looks very shaky
100t trash comps , 100t unfortunate scenario , Optic struggling and sentinels losing maps to teams like Optic
Guard new lineup etc etc
Lol

#11
Neeraj
0
Frags
+
nikoko07 [#5]

winning emea challengers is harder than winning worlds lmao

maybe

#12
diegoteh
0
Frags
+

valorant is a fps, so basically na has no chance

#13
WiseGorbachev
0
Frags
+

"Dropping maps to teams like g2"

Delusional NA fan thinking that G2 who aren't even top 5 EU wouldn't 13-0 any top 5 na team, we did the same NA>EU thing before champs and EU ended up winning every game

When the time comes we'll see the real gap between EU and NA teams, it'll be like CS soon

#14
kristof
0
Frags
+

NA t1 is so bad that the t2 teams actually look legit now

#15
ciro
0
Frags
+

Why do yall think teams like NAVI, FPX G2 and and all arent good
Honestly if EMEA sent Navi, G2 and FPX to Iceland, im sure all of them would make top 6, 2 of them would almost certainly make finals and 1 of them is surely winning the tournament

#16
number1_ScreaM_fan
1
Frags
+

Bro NAVI looks better than c9 or v1 imo

#17
Yeetus
1
Frags
+
Arisqq [#2]

EU wins ez NA at evrey game KEKW

TSM won siege invitational

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment