I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH
completed
... 349 more matches
Saturday, March 5th
4:00 PM EST
Patch 4.02
Misc updates
C9 ban Fracture; LG ban Ascent; C9 pick Haven; LG pick Bind; C9 ban Breeze; LG ban Split; Icebox remains
Maps/Stats
All Kills
First Kills
Op Kills
xeta
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
vanity
C9
|
leaf
C9
|
|
bdog
LG
|
5
8
-3
|
6
3
+3
|
7
5
+2
|
3
5
-2
|
5
7
-2
|
|
mada
LG
|
7
2
+5
|
6
9
-3
|
5
8
-3
|
8
4
+4
|
5
11
-6
|
|
dazzLe
LG
|
6
4
+2
|
3
5
-2
|
5
3
+2
|
6
9
-3
|
5
9
-4
|
|
moose
LG
|
2
5
-3
|
6
4
+2
|
6
9
-3
|
6
6
+0
|
4
8
-4
|
|
TiGG
LG
|
1
5
-4
|
4
5
-1
|
9
7
+2
|
4
7
-3
|
10
9
+1
|
|
xeta
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
vanity
C9
|
leaf
C9
|
|
|
bdog
LG
|
0
3
-3
|
2
0
+2
|
0
2
-2
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
mada
LG
|
2
0
+2
|
2
3
-1
|
0
2
-2
|
0
1
-1
|
2
3
-1
|
|
dazzLe
LG
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
1
1
+0
|
|
moose
LG
|
|
1
1
+0
|
0
1
-1
|
1
2
-1
|
1
1
+0
|
|
TiGG
LG
|
0
1
-1
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
3
2
+1
|
|
xeta
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
vanity
C9
|
leaf
C9
|
|
|
bdog
LG
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
mada
LG
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
dazzLe
LG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
moose
LG
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
TiGG
LG
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TiGG
LG
|
|
5
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
4
|
0
|
|
bdog
LG
|
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
0
|
0
|
|
dazzLe
LG
|
|
6
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
2
|
2
|
|
mada
LG
|
|
9
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
2
|
0
|
|
moose
LG
|
|
3
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
2
|
0
|
|
xeta
C9
|
|
4
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
2
|
|
|
|
51
|
4
|
2
|
|
mitch
C9
|
|
6
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
3
|
1
|
|
vanity
C9
|
|
6
|
2
|
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
43
|
7
|
1
|
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
0
|
0
|
|
leaf
C9
|
|
8
|
4
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
3
|
0
|
|
xeta
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
vanity
C9
|
leaf
C9
|
|
|
bdog
LG
|
1
5
-4
|
0
2
-2
|
1
2
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
1
4
-3
|
|
mada
LG
|
1
1
+0
|
1
2
-1
|
1
4
-3
|
2
3
-1
|
1
4
-3
|
|
dazzLe
LG
|
2
1
+1
|
0
3
-3
|
1
2
-1
|
2
4
-2
|
2
3
-1
|
|
moose
LG
|
1
1
+0
|
2
3
-1
|
2
4
-2
|
0
2
-2
|
3
3
+0
|
|
TiGG
LG
|
1
3
-2
|
2
3
-1
|
5
1
+4
|
1
4
-3
|
2
4
-2
|
|
xeta
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
vanity
C9
|
leaf
C9
|
|
|
bdog
LG
|
0
2
-2
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
mada
LG
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
0
2
-2
|
|
dazzLe
LG
|
|
|
|
|
1
1
+0
|
|
moose
LG
|
|
1
1
+0
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
TiGG
LG
|
0
1
-1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
xeta
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
vanity
C9
|
leaf
C9
|
|
|
bdog
LG
|
|
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
mada
LG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dazzLe
LG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
moose
LG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TiGG
LG
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TiGG
LG
|
|
1
Round 3
leaf Xeppaa |
|
1
Round 14
vanity mitch leaf Xeppaa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
0
|
0
|
|
bdog
LG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
0
|
0
|
|
dazzLe
LG
|
|
3
Round 3
vanity xeta
Round 4
vanity Xeppaa
Round 9
leaf xeta |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
0
|
0
|
|
mada
LG
|
|
2
Round 11
mitch vanity mada
Round 13
vanity xeta |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
1
|
0
|
|
moose
LG
|
|
1
Round 13
mitch leaf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
0
|
0
|
|
xeta
C9
|
|
3
Round 4
bdog TiGG
Round 5
dazzLe moose
Round 12
mada bdog |
|
|
|
1
Round 11
mada |
|
|
|
|
69
|
4
|
0
|
|
mitch
C9
|
|
3
Round 5
mada bdog
Round 11
moose TiGG
Round 15
mada dazzLe |
1
Round 9
bdog TiGG moose |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
2
|
0
|
|
vanity
C9
|
|
2
Round 9
mada dazzLe
Round 11
dazzLe bdog |
1
Round 2
TiGG moose dazzLe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
1
|
0
|
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
|
2
Round 7
moose mada
Round 10
TiGG dazzLe |
|
1
Round 16
bdog mada dazzLe moose |
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
0
|
0
|
|
leaf
C9
|
|
5
Round 4
mada dazzLe
Round 10
moose mada
Round 12
dazzLe TiGG
Round 13
bdog TiGG
Round 15
moose TiGG |
|
1
Round 1
mada moose bdog dazzLe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
2
|
0
|
|
xeta
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
vanity
C9
|
leaf
C9
|
|
|
bdog
LG
|
4
3
+1
|
6
1
+5
|
6
3
+3
|
3
4
-1
|
4
3
+1
|
|
mada
LG
|
6
1
+5
|
5
7
-2
|
4
4
+0
|
6
1
+5
|
4
7
-3
|
|
dazzLe
LG
|
4
3
+1
|
3
2
+1
|
4
1
+3
|
4
5
-1
|
3
6
-3
|
|
moose
LG
|
1
4
-3
|
4
1
+3
|
4
5
-1
|
6
4
+2
|
1
5
-4
|
|
TiGG
LG
|
0
2
-2
|
2
2
+0
|
4
6
-2
|
3
3
+0
|
8
5
+3
|
|
xeta
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
vanity
C9
|
leaf
C9
|
|
|
bdog
LG
|
0
1
-1
|
2
0
+2
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
mada
LG
|
2
0
+2
|
2
2
+0
|
0
2
-2
|
|
2
1
+1
|
|
dazzLe
LG
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
|
moose
LG
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
2
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
TiGG
LG
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
3
2
+1
|
|
xeta
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
vanity
C9
|
leaf
C9
|
|
|
bdog
LG
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
|
mada
LG
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
dazzLe
LG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
moose
LG
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
TiGG
LG
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TiGG
LG
|
|
4
Round 11
 leaf  mitch
Round 17
 Xeppaa vanity
Round 22
Xeppaa leaf
Round 26
leaf mitch |
|
|
|
1
Round 11
mitch |
|
|
|
|
37
|
4
|
0
|
|
bdog
LG
|
|
3
Round 2
leaf xeta
Round 5
xeta vanity
Round 9
mitch xeta |
2
Round 14
mitch leaf Xeppaa
Round 20
mitch Xeppaa leaf |
1
Round 23
mitch Xeppaa leaf vanity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
0
|
0
|
|
dazzLe
LG
|
|
3
Round 12
Xeppaa xeta
Round 22
xeta vanity
Round 24
leaf vanity |
1
Round 13
Xeppaa mitch xeta |
|
|
1
Round 22
vanity |
|
|
|
|
42
|
2
|
2
|
|
mada
LG
|
|
7
Round 1
leaf xeta
Round 4
xeta mitch
Round 5
mitch Xeppaa
Round 14
vanity xeta
Round 19
leaf xeta
Round 21
xeta Xeppaa
Round 26
Xeppaa vanity |
1
Round 9
leaf vanity Xeppaa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
1
|
0
|
|
moose
LG
|
|
2
Round 21
vanity mitch
Round 24
Xeppaa mitch |
1
Round 11
vanity Xeppaa xeta |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
2
|
0
|
|
xeta
C9
|
|
1
Round 15
bdog dazzLe |
1
Round 24
bdog dazzLe moose |
|
|
1
Round 17
TiGG |
2
Round 23
moose bdog
Round 24
dazzLe moose |
|
|
|
32
|
0
|
2
|
|
mitch
C9
|
|
3
Round 8
TiGG mada
Round 21
dazzLe mada
Round 28
mada TiGG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
1
|
1
|
|
vanity
C9
|
|
4
Round 8
moose dazzLe
Round 17
dazzLe bdog
Round 27
dazzLe bdog
Round 28
moose dazzLe |
1
Round 22
moose bdog TiGG |
|
|
1
Round 12
dazzLe |
1
Round 5
TiGG bdog |
|
|
|
37
|
6
|
1
|
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
|
2
Round 12
TiGG bdog
Round 15
moose mada |
2
Round 3
moose bdog TiGG
Round 10
bdog TiGG moose |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
0
|
0
|
|
leaf
C9
|
|
3
Round 6
TiGG mada
Round 17
mada moose
Round 23
mada dazzLe |
4
Round 7
moose bdog dazzLe
Round 11
bdog dazzLe mada
Round 18
TiGG dazzLe mada
Round 25
moose dazzLe TiGG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
1
|
0
|
Stats from this map are not available yet
Head-to-head
Past Matches
Fire737 [#5]C9 destroy lg so 100T can qualify
Not going to happen sadly :( lg won the head to head so even if 100t gets the last 2 wins, lg would qualify ahead
Kep1er22b [#7]Not going to happen sadly :( lg won the head to head so even if 100t gets the last 2 wins, lg would qualify ahead
Can you explain ?
So lg has already qualified?
Kep1er22b [#7]Not going to happen sadly :( lg won the head to head so even if 100t gets the last 2 wins, lg would qualify ahead
Actually your wrong
Lg loss here is beneficial for 100T
Kep1er22b [#7]Not going to happen sadly :( lg won the head to head so even if 100t gets the last 2 wins, lg would qualify ahead
its based off round differential so if LG get stomped, their diff is gonna get fucked making it slightly possible 100t qual over them
Delusional_Mitch_Fan [#1]I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH
exactly. mitch diff swift 2-0
plas [#10]its based off round differential so if LG get stomped, their diff is gonna get fucked making it slightly possible 100t qual over them
thats not what vanity or tarik said lmao
even if lg loses the rest and 100t win the rest
lg beat 100t in a head on head, making lg qualify over 100t
Fire737 [#9]Actually your wrong
Lg loss here is beneficial for 100T
nope, because they'll both end at 2 wins
LG won the head on head vs 100t
LG will qualify over 100t
Kep1er22b [#17]thats not what vanity or tarik said lmao
even if lg loses the rest and 100t win the rest
lg beat 100t in a head on head, making lg qualify over 100t
With this stupid logic lg has already qualified
Fire737 [#19]With this stupid logic lg has already qualified
well yea :| it'd be kinda stupid if it went by rounds instead of head to heads
Delusional_Mitch_Fan [#1]I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH
Diffy in the Mitchy C9 2-0
LoganThePredictor [#24]Will any of the matches left in the group stage be played on the new patch?
the final week
Kep1er22b [#17]thats not what vanity or tarik said lmao
even if lg loses the rest and 100t win the rest
lg beat 100t in a head on head, making lg qualify over 100t
100T can qualify if they beat XSET
vanityxz [#21]#LGLoyal 2-0
THE MOOSE IS LOOSE
can u ask ur team to stop shitting on lg please?
oh, you already did?
Lets go map 2 and 3 is in the bag.
Kep1er22b [#18]nope, because they'll both end at 2 wins
LG won the head on head vs 100tLG will qualify over 100t
It goes by rounds. So if 100T gets 2-3 and they have a better W/L by rounds played they advance. The 13-0 really hurt them. But I don’t think I’ve ever seen a tournament format that tracks round spread go off a head to head. Because then the event would be considered over by now. There’s no way they’re going to continue to play games that don’t even matter
Discord