KEEP SHOOTING BODIES FRAUD
Bring s0m back
Vyantic [#2]He was just tilted, they got ran down with all due respect lol
he's getting paid too much money to throw away chances to win because he's tilted.
ipok6 [#5]he's getting paid too much money to throw away chances to win because he's tilted.
idk man he looked like the only one trying to win from where im sitting, only dude that didnt go negative, only one with a positive rating, one of 2 with positive fl/fd, i dont think hes the problem
ipok6 [#5]he's getting paid too much money to throw away chances to win because he's tilted.
Were you born upside down? His team got demolished and he didn’t even get the chance to rotate
ugi53BFhfS [#11]Were you born upside down? His team got demolished and he didn’t even get the chance to rotate
what the fuck are you talking about? he had already rotated. he was sitting in CT, he had a recall to pick up a rifle and play the 1v3 out. instead he chose to waste time spamming bodies.
HIMNIJ [#10]idk man he looked like the only one trying to win from where im sitting, only dude that didnt go negative, only one with a positive rating, one of 2 with positive fl/fd, i dont think hes the problem
are you a baboon of some kind? how exactly does 'not going negative' mean you didn't throw away a chance to win the game? is there a secret mechanism i'm unaware of where the game minuses 50 from your kill score when you throw a round?
ipok6 [#12]what the fuck are you talking about? he had already rotated. he was sitting in CT, he had a recall to pick up a rifle and play the 1v3 out. instead he chose to waste time spamming bodies.
there was a negative percentage chance of him winning that 1v3.
ipok6 [#13]are you a baboon of some kind? how exactly does 'not going negative' mean you didn't throw away a chance to win the game? is there a secret mechanism i'm unaware of where the game minuses 50 from your kill score when you throw a round?
he's the only one that was really shooting back in map 1
askrial [#14]there was a negative percentage chance of him winning that 1v3.
wrong. it was a low, but absolutely positive, percentage. especially given how G2 were absolutely salivating at the chance to give him free 1v1s. see: the fight Jawgemo gave him not 5 seconds earlier.
Semen-1 [#17]he's the only one that was really shooting back in map 1
hey fuckwit, we teach reading in Australian schools, were you homeschooled or something? I ask again, does "shooting back in map 1" mean you didn't throw away a chance to win in map 2?
ipok6 [#18]wrong. it was a low, but absolutely positive, percentage. especially given how G2 were absolutely salivating at the chance to give him free 1v1s. see: the fight Jawgemo gave him not 5 seconds earlier.
askrial [#20]
- viper's pit
- 2 people holding
- he had a judge, and had a low percent chance to grab the gun, due to spam
- shit mental
- g2 were feeling it
- idk, you're just being dense
you know negative percentages don't fucking EXIST, right? you can list a million things counting against him and NOTHING will change the fact that he had a small chance to save his team and willingly chose not to take it.
ipok6 [#19]hey fuckwit, we teach reading in Australian schools, were you homeschooled or something? I ask again, does "shooting back in map 1" mean you didn't throw away a chance to win in map 2?
bricks for brains, ironically doesn't that mean his team sold him map 1?
Ur looking at the last 2 rounds where he shot some bodies and raging over that. If anything his astra provided the most impact in split maybe apart from brawks clutches. Watch the whole game with ur eyes next time
ipok6 [#21]you know negative percentages don't fucking EXIST, right? you can list a million things counting against him and NOTHING will change the fact that he had a small chance to save his team and willingly chose not to take it.
tf u one -ve percentage does exist thats how loss is depicted ?
ipok6 [#21]you know negative percentages don't fucking EXIST, right? you can list a million things counting against him and NOTHING will change the fact that he had a small chance to save his team and willingly chose not to take it.
allat
ugi53BFhfS [#11]Were you born upside down? His team got demolished and he didn’t even get the chance to rotate
Misogynistic chud saying this btw.
ipok6 [#21]you know negative percentages don't fucking EXIST, right? you can list a million things counting against him and NOTHING will change the fact that he had a small chance to save his team and willingly chose not to take it.
hy·per·bo·le
/hīˈpərbəlē/
noun
exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally.
MachiDesu [#26]Guess who’s back on the market? TENZEDZOMBIE
Tenz is not joining NRG
ipok6 [#19]hey fuckwit, we teach reading in Australian schools, were you homeschooled or something? I ask again, does "shooting back in map 1" mean you didn't throw away a chance to win in map 2?
do they also teach you to cuss when proving a point while others are being polite?
Moreover, do you even know how the game works? He heard the neon solo pushing and knew the others' weren't close or low on hp. The only argument could be that he could've taken the slimmest chances and done what he did without shooting the bodies, giving him the advantage of a fraction of a second.
ipok6 [#13]are you a baboon of some kind? how exactly does 'not going negative' mean you didn't throw away a chance to win the game? is there a secret mechanism i'm unaware of where the game minuses 50 from your kill score when you throw a round?
a game of valorant is made up of literally thousands of decisions over the course of a series, honing in on singular mistakes is a dumb fuck way of deciding whether a player had a positive or negative impact on the game, and no one wants to analyse every single round down to the exact rotation timings to figure out a players impact either, thats why we use these beautiful things called STATS, that let you see how that players impacted the game
HIMNIJ [#32]a game of valorant is made up of literally thousands of decisions over the course of a series, honing in on singular mistakes is a dumb fuck way of deciding whether a player had a positive or negative impact on the game, and no one wants to analyse every single round down to the exact rotation timings to figure out a players impact either, thats why we use these beautiful things called STATS, that let you see how that players impacted the game
yeah which is why i never said he had a negative impact on the game. ALL i said was that he threw in that round, and he is being paid too much to do so just because he's tilted. it can be said that he still had a positive impact on the game despite that. in fact it's pretty easy, considering the chance he threw away was pretty small anyway.
ipok6 [#33]yeah which is why i never said he had a negative impact on the game. ALL i said was that he threw in that round, and he is being paid too much to do so just because he's tilted. it can be said that he still had a positive impact on the game despite that. in fact it's pretty easy, considering the chance he threw away was pretty small anyway.
inactive for months just to come back and spew bs
Semen-1 [#34]inactive for months just to come back and spew bs
stalking my replies just to not read them
ipok6 [#35]stalking my replies just to not read them
what is there to read?
your baby tantrum at keiko 'throwing'
Araise [#4]how do you wear the nrg banner
He is not the best player lmao
Keiko came and now NRG is worse
He is a fraud we don't need a player tilting
spacemangg [#38]we'll take em back on TL
NO revisionist bs but that team liquid roster with trexx actually had some magic that couldve been tourney winning, change a few rounds throughout the year and they wouldve made 3 international playoffs and had the same calibre of year as g2
ipok6 [#5]he's getting paid too much money to throw away chances to win because he's tilted.
uneducated, miserable or ragebait. cant tell