tantanzin [#25]
No, we should not. Brazil has talent to field 4 or 5 competitive teams our orgs just sucks on doing that. we want as many spots as we can get and the m80 part does not make sense, a team weaker than 2g would have been better for the tier 1 in general? Acting like any team with 5 americans would be better than all of the non NA teams in VTC and the other regions dont have enough talent is just extreme bias. if a SA team win ascension they deserve it.
My comment about being sore loses was not just about you but about NA fans in general all of you say the same shit about that ascension and i'm 100% sure that if any non NA team win this ascension the same narrative will start again. Have a nice day.
eh, i hope you're right and eventually the orgs pick better rosters. they're letting down the whole image of brazil if so, because me and many others believe brazil shouldn't have as many spots, and i'll be waiting for proof otherwise
i suppose since roster changes exist, i'm saying that an na team would have been better for the balance than 2g, even if they won ascension. and if you are using one match to determine who deserves to be in t1, wouldn't the furia substitute roster be a better choice over 2g? but you raise a good point, especially with performing at clutch moments and all that, 2g deserved to make it for sure. have a nice day as well