3

"Best ascension players getting pouched isn't fair

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
gold2peak

Is this the worst take ever? Imagine you're by far the best player on an ascension winner (kaajak), tier 1 teams are lining up to give you a much bigger contract on a team that could compete for titles but instead you get rewarded with being stuck on a bad team with small salary and no chances of winning anything.

#2
9wntr
2
Frags
+

true
kaajak on apeks woulda been a waste

#3
dikkelul3bier
1
Frags
+

Yeah but this screwed over Apeks a lot, the whole synergy of the team is just gone because they have to trial a new team without their best player. Still think they wouldn’t have made it far but still is unfair for the t2 team.

#5
9wntr
1
Frags
+

i get both sides of the argument ngl

#6
dikkelul3bier
1
Frags
+

yeah me too, you also can’t force t2 players to stay with their team, but that’s why I like the new format more for vct

#4
Zerphyr1
0
Frags
+

a lot of ascension teams aren't bad, its legit only the case in emea where they have done nothing so far

#7
jack-of-all-trades
0
Frags
+

They're pretty bad compared to t1 teams. I don't know any ascension team that wouldn't be at the bottom of the league

#8
Zerphyr1
1
Frags
+

bbl pcific look quite good and would be your average emea team i feel like.

also its always hard to say since we never see these teams compete with t1 teams (saying this for all regions).

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment