C9 2-1 Rise
14-12
7-13
13-0
100T
C9
100T
C9
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.61 1.82 1.41 | 345 360 331 | 30 16 14 | / 21 9 12 / | 5 3 2 | +9 +7 +2 | 85% 92% 77% | 227 253 201 | 22% 22% 23% | 7 3 4 | 3 0 3 | +4 +3 +1 | |
|
1.30 1.40 1.21 | 217 247 189 | 20 12 8 | / 15 7 8 / | 7 2 5 | +5 +5 0 | 77% 85% 69% | 154 161 147 | 19% 22% 16% | 2 2 0 | 3 2 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.02 0.77 1.27 | 229 213 246 | 20 10 10 | / 21 11 10 / | 6 3 3 | -1 -1 0 | 73% 69% 77% | 153 123 183 | 20% 14% 25% | 1 1 0 | 4 2 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.95 0.73 1.16 | 164 177 152 | 15 8 7 | / 16 10 6 / | 5 3 2 | -1 -2 +1 | 65% 62% 69% | 101 98 103 | 23% 21% 27% | 2 1 1 | 2 2 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.65 0.72 0.57 | 130 116 146 | 12 6 6 | / 20 8 12 / | 12 6 6 | -8 -2 -6 | 73% 77% 69% | 94 76 112 | 28% 29% 27% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.29 0.93 1.66 | 257 178 337 | 20 8 12 | / 17 8 9 / | 11 2 9 | +3 0 +3 | 77% 69% 85% | 180 121 239 | 20% 32% 16% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.22 0.96 1.48 | 227 138 316 | 20 6 14 | / 17 7 10 / | 13 6 7 | +3 -1 +4 | 77% 77% 77% | 153 105 200 | 22% 20% 23% | 2 0 2 | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.10 1.24 0.97 | 280 321 239 | 26 15 11 | / 20 11 9 / | 7 4 3 | +6 +4 +2 | 81% 85% 77% | 189 221 158 | 23% 27% 19% | 4 2 2 | 2 0 2 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
0.71 0.85 0.57 | 162 195 129 | 14 9 5 | / 18 8 10 / | 5 4 1 | -4 +1 -5 | 69% 85% 54% | 107 110 105 | 18% 17% 18% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.37 0.71 0.04 | 144 227 62 | 13 10 3 | / 25 12 13 / | 3 2 1 | -12 -2 -10 | 58% 69% 46% | 99 155 43 | 22% 26% 9% | 5 5 0 | 7 4 3 | -2 +1 -3 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.32 1.34 1.33 | 284 276 298 | 62 26 36 | / 51 23 28 / | 17 9 8 | +11 +3 +8 | 79% 79% 78% | 191 193 190 | 19% 18% 19% | 12 6 6 | 9 2 7 | +3 +4 -1 | |
|
0.89 1.21 1.07 | 187 167 211 | 43 17 26 | / 43 22 21 / | 19 10 9 | 0 -5 +5 | 68% 76% 62% | 135 116 151 | 24% 23% 25% | 5 2 3 | 5 3 2 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.83 0.95 0.90 | 184 201 185 | 44 21 23 | / 52 24 28 / | 16 7 9 | -8 -3 -5 | 70% 76% 65% | 133 132 134 | 25% 17% 32% | 2 1 1 | 7 3 4 | -5 -2 -3 | |
|
0.75 0.81 0.79 | 150 182 125 | 34 18 16 | / 47 25 22 / | 12 7 5 | -13 -7 -6 | 58% 59% 57% | 95 113 81 | 22% 23% 20% | 4 2 2 | 8 4 4 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
0.68 0.66 0.67 | 162 152 164 | 35 17 18 | / 54 24 30 / | 25 10 15 | -19 -7 -12 | 68% 69% 68% | 119 110 126 | 32% 38% 28% | 4 1 3 | 10 5 5 | -6 -4 -2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.91 1.64 1.23 | 270 215 338 | 66 27 39 | / 45 27 18 / | 22 15 7 | +21 0 +21 | 82% 76% 90% | 178 153 210 | 21% 21% 21% | 9 3 6 | 2 0 2 | +7 +3 +4 | |
|
0.96 1.35 1.13 | 172 139 229 | 41 19 22 | / 36 20 16 / | 26 11 15 | +5 -1 +6 | 80% 76% 86% | 128 105 157 | 19% 23% 17% | 4 2 2 | 1 0 1 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
0.94 1.08 1.00 | 183 176 213 | 42 25 17 | / 43 23 20 / | 22 8 14 | -1 +2 -3 | 76% 70% 83% | 126 106 150 | 19% 21% 17% | 5 4 1 | 4 2 2 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
1.08 0.85 0.98 | 197 214 171 | 45 31 14 | / 42 21 21 / | 15 8 7 | +3 +10 -7 | 73% 76% 69% | 126 127 125 | 16% 17% 15% | 3 1 2 | 5 2 3 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
1.04 0.87 0.96 | 250 278 183 | 53 34 19 | / 52 29 23 / | 12 7 5 | +1 +5 -4 | 64% 70% 55% | 148 174 114 | 22% 25% 16% | 18 12 6 | 15 11 4 | +3 +1 +2 |
100T
C9
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.33 0.77 1.60 | 288 174 346 | 17 3 14 | / 14 5 9 / | 6 2 4 | +3 -2 +5 | 67% 50% 75% | 202 152 227 | 21% 27% 19% | 1 1 0 | 4 1 3 | -3 0 -3 | |
|
0.85 0.82 0.87 | 197 195 199 | 12 4 8 | / 15 5 10 / | 4 1 3 | -3 -1 -2 | 61% 67% 58% | 145 159 138 | 42% 43% 41% | 2 0 2 | 2 1 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.74 0.67 0.78 | 159 175 151 | 9 3 6 | / 14 6 8 / | 4 3 1 | -5 -3 -2 | 56% 83% 42% | 105 127 94 | 22% 21% 23% | 2 1 1 | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.72 0.24 0.96 | 142 119 155 | 9 3 6 | / 14 7 7 / | 3 1 2 | -5 -4 -1 | 56% 67% 50% | 111 89 122 | 32% 33% 31% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.39 0.57 0.30 | 100 156 72 | 6 4 2 | / 15 5 10 / | 4 1 3 | -9 -1 -8 | 61% 83% 50% | 66 78 59 | 31% 29% 33% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.72 0.96 3.24 | 298 179 536 | 21 7 14 | / 9 7 2 / | 10 9 1 | +12 0 +12 | 83% 75% 100% | 196 131 326 | 23% 14% 33% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.67 1.91 1.18 | 383 448 254 | 23 18 5 | / 13 8 5 / | 5 2 3 | +10 +10 0 | 72% 83% 50% | 235 269 166 | 24% 26% 17% | 7 5 2 | 2 1 1 | +5 +4 +1 | |
|
1.07 1.01 1.19 | 204 195 225 | 14 9 5 | / 11 7 4 / | 3 1 2 | +3 +2 +1 | 72% 67% 83% | 136 118 172 | 16% 14% 18% | 1 1 0 | 2 2 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.96 0.87 1.12 | 119 114 132 | 7 5 2 | / 8 6 2 / | 4 2 2 | -1 -1 0 | 78% 67% 100% | 99 101 94 | 29% 29% 27% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.61 0.71 0.41 | 112 136 65 | 7 6 1 | / 12 8 4 / | 5 3 2 | -5 -2 -3 | 78% 75% 83% | 63 73 44 | 11% 17% 0% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 |
100T
C9
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.17 1.07 1.25 | 222 212 231 | 18 7 11 | / 16 8 8 / | 6 3 3 | +2 -1 +3 | 73% 80% 67% | 164 175 155 | 28% 18% 42% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.09 0.63 1.47 | 201 92 293 | 14 2 12 | / 14 8 6 / | 9 7 2 | 0 -6 +6 | 68% 70% 67% | 133 73 183 | 28% 17% 30% | 2 0 2 | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.99 0.99 0.99 | 220 228 215 | 15 7 8 | / 16 9 7 / | 6 4 2 | -1 -2 +1 | 82% 80% 83% | 140 140 141 | 11% 9% 14% | 4 2 2 | 2 1 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.64 0.82 0.48 | 126 194 70 | 10 7 3 | / 17 9 8 / | 3 1 2 | -7 -2 -5 | 50% 40% 58% | 80 125 43 | 21% 29% 13% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.54 0.54 0.55 | 158 172 148 | 11 7 4 | / 19 11 8 / | 9 3 6 | -8 -4 -4 | 68% 60% 75% | 127 126 129 | 28% 44% 19% | 2 1 1 | 6 4 2 | -4 -3 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.21 1.38 1.02 | 226 256 191 | 17 13 4 | / 13 6 7 / | 7 3 4 | +4 +7 -3 | 77% 75% 80% | 140 154 123 | 16% 18% 12% | 1 0 1 | 3 0 3 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
1.17 1.04 1.32 | 170 166 176 | 14 8 6 | / 11 7 4 / | 9 3 6 | +3 +1 +2 | 86% 83% 90% | 123 110 139 | 13% 19% 10% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.09 0.53 1.75 | 222 161 296 | 17 6 11 | / 14 9 5 / | 4 3 1 | +3 -3 +6 | 64% 58% 70% | 135 101 175 | 19% 19% 18% | 6 2 4 | 6 6 0 | 0 -4 +4 | |
|
0.99 0.52 1.56 | 232 137 347 | 19 5 14 | / 16 9 7 / | 5 2 3 | +3 -4 +7 | 82% 67% 100% | 151 103 208 | 17% 22% 15% | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
0.97 1.18 0.72 | 179 214 139 | 15 11 4 | / 14 7 7 / | 6 3 3 | +1 +4 -3 | 73% 67% 80% | 113 124 100 | 18% 13% 28% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 |
Stop hacking the universe pls. Second time today you’ve actually been right
Man I think C9B got this - coming in off a high. Vanity feeling himself. Strats look clean. Shots looking crisp.
100T 1 - 2 C9B
nitr0 and Ethan were the underpeformers today. Even if b0i did do bad today he doesn’t deserve the hate.
IGL DIFF? HAHAHAHAHA u know we are talking about nitr0 who was the IGL of arguably the best NA CSGO team of all time lmao
"NA skill issue" but C9 still won a major with NA skills lmfao. and funnily enough TL had better players then major winning C9 team. IGL diff it is
Almost like hes IGLing a completely different game now, weird how it doesnt fully translate. And Liquid never won tournaments cause of insane leading they won cause of player skill and dominating individually, they played VERY loose CS
C9 literally just gotta shut down Asuna and they win the round
Easier said than done though...
Everyone hating on b0i while he had better acs playing viper than nitr0 who was playing jett
b0i kinda poppin wtf, this game getting really fucking interesting. excited to see last map #C9WIN
rise is definitely a very solid team but good luck to c9! if they win they deserve it 100%
tbh 100t should build around asuna ethan nitro now, the new 16 year old sub sevvn could fill that jett role and actually trialing a 5th to fill the holes would be better than just adding an analyst. Hiko needs to change playstyle its too easy to read. Will be a top team again in 2022
This is actually what twitch refers to as "silver chat" lmao cutting hiko is a huge mistake
well ok if they want a baiting sova one trick their entire existence then by all means go ahead, just think they need some more variety and a second real duelist player.
Hiko is a baiting bot who can only play 1 agent, 100t need to sign a real sova who can frag like Cloud or Shao, all good NA sovas are already taken so maybe it's the time for 100t scouts to explore cis market because the team itself is getting carried by a ukrainian anyways kekw
They won't cut Hiko, for his role he does well enough and he's a very disciplined player. What it came down to most, was that 100T is completely incompetent on Breeze. I think the majority of the top 10 NA teams could take down 100T on Breeze.
It all comes down to playstyle vs playstyle on that map tbh, they didn't adapt well to c9s style. Personally i've always disliked Hiko's playstyle and think it is way too one dimensional.
thing is tho
100T is the asymptotic curve and qualifying for champion is the axis, always super close but never reach it
the most fucking wild game ever.
So like after this surely boi back to being an analyst move nitro back to smokes and sign a cracked out jett kid.
ethan and Nitro choked.
This has nothing to do with Boi. he played well.
No ethan no win.
Also yeah they choked, but they Ethan is still a top talent and nitro not trying to igl on jett is probably best for the long term for both his igl decisions and play making
Nothing against boi, I think his had a solid tournament given how late he came in. I just don't think he's the long term fit
Probably that like seven kid they have as a sub. I'm just going to assume his a true g fuel snorting, head clicking wonder kid but I'll be honest don't know much about him
Your are right but breeze was 100t's key map when steel was there and they would have never lost breeze if steel was there
They def still would have lost, wasnt even close and steel isnt motivated to play professionally atm
Removing steel just before LCQ was a terrible idea in itself. They could have made it to champions if steel was there. They lost breeze to Geng and now to c9.
Could have played LCQ with steel and they would have one month to sort out the miscommunications or whatever before champions. Why steel was so terrible especially when you have above average performance in master's Berlin ? Bonkers
Steel wasnt benched cause he was poor he was benched cause he didnt have motivation to play and wasnt feeling the game. You cant force someone to play
respect to whoever is scripting cus this was a great match