2

Reason why NA are the best

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
Noyn

American teams are proving in this tournament that it is more valuable to pay attention to basic FPS fundamentals like Clutch, Trade, Positioning, and communication, than to know 1000 different tactics and skill lineups, they play very well default and despite not having the best players mechanically are always well positioned around the map and rotate at the right time.

What do you guys think?

#2
Sam_2
-5
Frags
+

lmfao "Not having the best players mechanically"
you talking bout your god mwzera who can't even qual for anything?
we got TenZ Yay Vic Asuna and u clinging on to a player who's proven nothing

#3
edelhose1337
0
Frags
+

100t and gambit are better than sentinels and acend in tactical aspects.
But sentinels and acend are more skilled than them

#4
Sam_2
-1
Frags
+

Like please don't come in here with backhanded compliments

#5
HackNaija
0
Frags
+
Sam_2 [#2]

lmfao "Not having the best players mechanically"
you talking bout your god mwzera who can't even qual for anything?
we got TenZ Yay Vic Asuna and u clinging on to a player who's proven nothing

are you high?

#6
patuj
5
Frags
+

I think their biggest advantage is their prior experience. EMEA teams for example are full of young players with minimal experience. While NA has bunch of players with tier 1-2 CSGO background.

#7
Sam_2
-2
Frags
+
HackNaija [#5]

are you high?

Nah I'm low

#8
Noyn
0
Frags
+
Sam_2 [#2]

lmfao "Not having the best players mechanically"
you talking bout your god mwzera who can't even qual for anything?
we got TenZ Yay Vic Asuna and u clinging on to a player who's proven nothing

I didn't mean about them, if you were smarter you would know how to interpret my text

#9
Sam_2
-5
Frags
+
Noyn [#8]

I didn't mean about them, if you were smarter you would know how to interpret my text

nah bro you come in here and even with a compliment you still wanna diss NA
at that point just don't say anything is what I'm saying
"if you were smarter" stfu

#10
Noyn
3
Frags
+
patuj [#6]

I think their biggest advantage is their prior experience. EMEA teams for example are full of young players with minimal experience. While NA has bunch of players with tier 1-2 CSGO background.

True, most NA players are LAN rats.

#11
Noyn
0
Frags
+
Sam_2 [#9]

nah bro you come in here and even with a compliment you still wanna diss NA
at that point just don't say anything is what I'm saying
"if you were smarter" stfu

So FNS>Nats, Marved>Avova?

#12
Sam_2
-3
Frags
+
Noyn [#11]

So FNS>Nats, Marved>Avova?

Pujan prolly not but Jimmy is definitely better

#13
HLTVtoxic
1
Frags
+
edelhose1337 [#3]

100t and gambit are better than sentinels and acend in tactical aspects.
But sentinels and acend are more skilled than them

random question, but do u think gambit's lack of lan experience played a part in their recent loss?

#14
Noyn
2
Frags
+
Sam_2 [#12]

Pujan prolly not but Jimmy is definitely better

LMAO

#15
edelhose1337
2
Frags
+
HLTVtoxic [#13]

random question, but do u think gambit's lack of lan experience played a part in their recent loss?

a lot. there were a big mental breakdown after they losed to many rounds on icebox defense.

#16
Sunot
1
Frags
+

Just give other regions time, they will catch up and they have to switch agmes(again) lol

#17
Noyn
1
Frags
+
Sunot [#16]

Just give other regions time, they will catch up and they have to switch agmes(again) lol

I love Forsaken mf

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment