SEN vs 100T grand finals (watch SEN are gonna get knocked to the lower brackets again)
vanity
V1
|
effys
V1
|
wippie
V1
|
Zellsis
V1
|
penny
V1
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
9
10
-1
|
10
9
+1
|
15
8
+7
|
9
6
+3
|
10
8
+2
|
dapr
SEN
|
9
9
+0
|
6
9
-3
|
11
5
+6
|
12
2
+10
|
13
11
+2
|
zombs
SEN
|
12
7
+5
|
13
3
+10
|
3
6
-3
|
12
6
+6
|
8
15
-7
|
TenZ
SEN
|
10
8
+2
|
12
10
+2
|
15
4
+11
|
14
12
+2
|
10
10
+0
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
11
2
+9
|
9
7
+2
|
9
7
+2
|
11
9
+2
|
10
12
-2
|
vanity
V1
|
effys
V1
|
wippie
V1
|
Zellsis
V1
|
penny
V1
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
2
1
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
1
4
-3
|
1
0
+1
|
4
2
+2
|
dapr
SEN
|
2
1
+1
|
|
1
1
+0
|
5
0
+5
|
2
1
+1
|
zombs
SEN
|
1
1
+0
|
1
0
+1
|
|
4
0
+4
|
2
2
+0
|
TenZ
SEN
|
3
1
+2
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
4
3
+1
|
5
2
+3
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
2
0
+2
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
vanity
V1
|
effys
V1
|
wippie
V1
|
Zellsis
V1
|
penny
V1
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
TenZ
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
|
3
0
+3
|
2
0
+2
|
2
2
+0
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
7
|
8
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
0
|
0
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
6
|
5
|
1
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
56
|
8
|
2
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
6
|
2
|
1
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
56
|
3
|
0
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
8
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
49
|
8
|
1
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
10
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
8
|
0
|
effys
V1
|
|
8
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
4
|
1
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
5
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
2
|
0
|
wippie
V1
|
|
2
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
2
|
1
|
penny
V1
|
|
7
|
6
|
2
|
|
2
|
|
|
1
|
|
59
|
2
|
4
|
vanity
V1
|
|
6
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
|
|
40
|
3
|
1
|
vanity
V1
|
effys
V1
|
wippie
V1
|
Zellsis
V1
|
penny
V1
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
4
1
+3
|
3
3
+0
|
7
5
+2
|
3
1
+2
|
2
1
+1
|
dapr
SEN
|
5
5
+0
|
3
2
+1
|
5
1
+4
|
3
1
+2
|
5
2
+3
|
zombs
SEN
|
2
2
+0
|
5
1
+4
|
0
1
-1
|
6
3
+3
|
5
5
+0
|
TenZ
SEN
|
3
1
+2
|
3
5
-2
|
5
2
+3
|
4
2
+2
|
3
2
+1
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
2
0
+2
|
3
2
+1
|
0
4
-4
|
1
5
-4
|
1
1
+0
|
vanity
V1
|
effys
V1
|
wippie
V1
|
Zellsis
V1
|
penny
V1
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
1
4
-3
|
|
0
1
-1
|
dapr
SEN
|
2
0
+2
|
|
|
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
TenZ
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
2
1
+1
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
vanity
V1
|
effys
V1
|
wippie
V1
|
Zellsis
V1
|
penny
V1
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
3
Round 7
vanity
wippie
Round 15
effys
vanity
Round 21
Zellsis
wippie
|
|
1
Round 13
vanity
effys
wippie
Zellsis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
0
|
0
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
3
Round 1
effys
Zellsis
Round 14
effys
wippie
Round 16
wippie
vanity
|
1
Round 17
vanity
Zellsis
wippie
|
1
Round 20
Zellsis
wippie
vanity
penny
|
|
|
1
Round 20
penny
vanity
|
|
|
|
63
|
3
|
1
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
1
Round 18
vanity
effys
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
1
|
0
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
3
Round 2
penny
effys
Round 10
vanity
Zellsis
Round 16
effys
Zellsis
|
1
Round 11
vanity
Zellsis
effys
|
|
|
|
1
Round 10
Zellsis
vanity
|
|
|
|
50
|
2
|
0
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
4
Round 4
vanity
effys
Round 6
wippie
penny
Round 12
vanity
Zellsis
Round 14
vanity
penny
|
2
Round 2
vanity
wippie
Zellsis
Round 7
penny
effys
Zellsis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
3
|
0
|
effys
V1
|
|
4
Round 3
TenZ
ShahZaM
Round 10
TenZ
SicK
Round 18
zombs
TenZ
Round 19
dapr
SicK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
0
|
1
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
1
Round 6
TenZ
ShahZaM
|
1
Round 4
zombs
SicK
dapr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
1
|
0
|
wippie
V1
|
|
|
1
Round 9
SicK
dapr
TenZ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
0
|
0
|
penny
V1
|
|
1
Round 12
zombs
dapr
|
1
Round 11
TenZ
dapr
zombs
|
|
|
1
Round 11
zombs
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
0
|
3
|
vanity
V1
|
|
1
Round 19
zombs
TenZ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
0
|
0
|
vanity
V1
|
effys
V1
|
wippie
V1
|
Zellsis
V1
|
penny
V1
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
3
4
-1
|
4
5
-1
|
6
1
+5
|
4
2
+2
|
5
4
+1
|
dapr
SEN
|
2
2
+0
|
3
4
-1
|
3
2
+1
|
8
0
+8
|
5
4
+1
|
zombs
SEN
|
6
1
+5
|
4
1
+3
|
2
3
-1
|
2
2
+0
|
1
5
-4
|
TenZ
SEN
|
4
4
+0
|
5
2
+3
|
4
1
+3
|
3
4
-1
|
5
2
+3
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
2
1
+1
|
2
3
-1
|
3
1
+2
|
3
2
+1
|
2
6
-4
|
vanity
V1
|
effys
V1
|
wippie
V1
|
Zellsis
V1
|
penny
V1
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
|
2
1
+1
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
5
0
+5
|
1
1
+0
|
zombs
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
TenZ
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
2
1
+1
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
|
|
vanity
V1
|
effys
V1
|
wippie
V1
|
Zellsis
V1
|
penny
V1
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
TenZ
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
0
2
-2
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
1
Round 16
effys
vanity
TenZ
|
4
Round 3
wippie
effys
penny
Round 9
penny
effys
wippie
Round 13
penny
Zellsis
effys
TenZ
Round 18
penny
wippie
vanity
|
1
Round 17
penny
Zellsis
effys
vanity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
0
|
0
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
3
Round 2
wippie
penny
Round 6
penny
wippie
Round 8
effys
vanity
SicK
|
3
Round 5
Zellsis
effys
penny
Round 10
vanity
wippie
effys
Round 22
wippie
Zellsis
effys
|
|
|
1
Round 22
effys
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
3
|
1
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
2
Round 5
vanity
wippie
Round 21
effys
Zellsis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
0
|
0
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
4
Round 4
vanity
effys
Round 6
effys
vanity
Round 11
vanity
wippie
Round 18
Zellsis
effys
|
|
|
|
|
1
Round 15
effys
vanity
|
|
|
|
45
|
5
|
0
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
5
Round 1
effys
penny
Round 2
Zellsis
effys
Round 8
Zellsis
penny
Round 9
Zellsis
vanity
Round 10
penny
Zellsis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
2
|
0
|
effys
V1
|
|
2
Round 5
dapr
TenZ
Round 20
dapr
ShahZaM
|
|
1
Round 14
SicK
ShahZaM
zombs
TenZ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
2
|
0
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
3
Round 15
TenZ
ShahZaM
Round 19
SicK
TenZ
Round 22
zombs
ShahZaM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
1
|
0
|
wippie
V1
|
|
2
Round 3
dapr
ShahZaM
Round 20
zombs
TenZ
|
|
|
|
1
Round 13
TenZ
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
2
|
1
|
penny
V1
|
|
4
Round 3
SicK
zombs
Round 4
ShahZaM
zombs
Round 11
SicK
ShahZaM
Round 13
dapr
ShahZaM
|
1
Round 7
zombs
ShahZaM
dapr
|
1
Round 12
dapr
zombs
TenZ
ShahZaM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
1
|
0
|
vanity
V1
|
|
1
Round 4
TenZ
SicK
|
1
Round 19
dapr
ShahZaM
zombs
|
|
|
1
Round 3
TenZ
|
2
Round 16
dapr
TenZ
Round 19
ShahZaM
zombs
|
|
|
|
44
|
0
|
1
|
vanity
V1
|
effys
V1
|
wippie
V1
|
Zellsis
V1
|
penny
V1
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
2
5
-3
|
3
1
+2
|
2
2
+0
|
2
3
-1
|
3
3
+0
|
dapr
SEN
|
2
2
+0
|
0
3
-3
|
3
2
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
3
5
-2
|
zombs
SEN
|
4
4
+0
|
4
1
+3
|
1
2
-1
|
4
1
+3
|
2
5
-3
|
TenZ
SEN
|
3
3
+0
|
4
3
+1
|
6
1
+5
|
7
6
+1
|
2
6
-4
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
7
1
+6
|
4
2
+2
|
6
2
+4
|
7
2
+5
|
7
5
+2
|
vanity
V1
|
effys
V1
|
wippie
V1
|
Zellsis
V1
|
penny
V1
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
2
0
+2
|
dapr
SEN
|
0
1
-1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
zombs
SEN
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
2
0
+2
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
1
1
+0
|
|
1
0
+1
|
2
3
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
vanity
V1
|
effys
V1
|
wippie
V1
|
Zellsis
V1
|
penny
V1
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
|
3
0
+3
|
2
0
+2
|
2
0
+2
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
3
Round 13
Zellsis
penny
Round 14
Zellsis
wippie
Round 22
wippie
Zellsis
|
4
Round 3
penny
effys
Zellsis
Round 5
vanity
Zellsis
wippie
Round 11
Zellsis
wippie
effys
Round 18
wippie
vanity
Zellsis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
0
|
0
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
1
Round 20
Zellsis
wippie
effys
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
2
|
0
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
3
Round 8
Zellsis
wippie
Round 19
wippie
Zellsis
Round 20
vanity
penny
|
2
Round 12
wippie
Zellsis
vanity
Round 14
effys
penny
vanity
|
1
Round 15
vanity
Zellsis
effys
wippie
|
|
1
Round 15
wippie
|
1
Round 21
penny
wippie
|
|
|
|
90
|
2
|
0
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
1
Round 16
Zellsis
effys
|
2
Round 1
vanity
penny
wippie
Round 21
Zellsis
effys
vanity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
1
|
1
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
1
Round 22
vanity
penny
|
1
Round 10
vanity
wippie
Zellsis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
3
|
0
|
effys
V1
|
|
2
Round 5
ShahZaM
TenZ
Round 13
dapr
TenZ
|
|
|
|
1
Round 1
zombs
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
2
|
0
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
1
Round 19
TenZ
dapr
|
1
Round 4
zombs
SicK
ShahZaM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
0
|
0
|
wippie
V1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
0
|
0
|
penny
V1
|
|
2
Round 1
TenZ
ShahZaM
Round 9
SicK
ShahZaM
|
4
Round 7
dapr
ShahZaM
TenZ
Round 8
TenZ
zombs
ShahZaM
Round 19
SicK
ShahZaM
zombs
Round 21
dapr
zombs
TenZ
|
1
Round 18
zombs
TenZ
dapr
SicK
|
|
1
Round 7
TenZ
|
|
|
1
Round 18
dapr
SicK
zombs
TenZ
|
|
80
|
1
|
1
|
vanity
V1
|
|
4
Round 2
zombs
ShahZaM
Round 9
dapr
zombs
Round 14
TenZ
SicK
Round 17
TenZ
zombs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
3
|
0
|
Rizvi [#2]This match would actually be useless, both teams would already be qualified and there is actually no seeding required
m
Rizvi [#2]This match would actually be useless, both teams would already be qualified and there is actually no seeding required
u get 40k opposed to getting 20k if in second place
Rizvi [#2]This match would actually be useless, both teams would already be qualified and there is actually no seeding required
1st gets 40k second gets 20k not bad
Rizvi [#2]This match would actually be useless, both teams would already be qualified and there is actually no seeding required
"money is money who cares about seeding" -Dapr
GodOfPog [#6]"money is money who cares about seeding" -Dapr
fr tho seeding is not that important I mean andbox got the 8th seed and defeated sen in a 2-0 fashion
Styx [#13]SEN 3-2 100T
Both are very strong teams but I feel like SEN wants it more, to prove that they still are the best team in NA after Masters 1.
After not making challengers 1 and losing to ABX in challengers 2 I feel like 100T are more solid than SEN. I could be wrong tho
alexzoid [#15]After not making challengers 1 and losing to ABX in challengers 2 I feel like 100T are more solid than SEN. I could be wrong tho
I feel like losing to ABX in R1 and not making challengers 1 has given them more to fight for. They are using their losses as energy and they keep fighting back. Look how they were against T1, they were down horribly but came back to win 2 back to back games. It proves they still have the fight that they had in Masters. 100T has a better track record in previous games, but SEN can change how a match is and find drive when it seems like they've lost.
Styx [#16]I feel like losing to ABX in R1 and not making challengers 1 has given them more to fight for. They are using their losses as energy and they keep fighting back. Look how they were against T1, they were down horribly but came back to win 2 back to back games. It proves they still have the fight that they had in Masters. 100T has a better track record in previous games, but SEN can change how a match is and find drive when it seems like they've lost.
I agree with this but not really. SEN will definitely have the motivation to make a comeback after they struggled previously this stage, but I feel like it also makes them a little shaky and more inconsistent. 100T have been steadily consistent and have only shown improvement imo. If we see SEN lock in and fix their struggles, then they could take this tournament. Otherwise, 100T takes this with dominance.
Rizvi [#2]This match would actually be useless, both teams would already be qualified and there is actually no seeding required
what about like... idk, PRIZE MONEY
alexzoid [#21]I agree with this but not really. SEN will definitely have the motivation to make a comeback after they struggled previously this stage, but I feel like it also makes them a little shaky and more inconsistent. 100T have been steadily consistent and have only shown improvement imo. If we see SEN lock in and fix their struggles, then they could take this tournament. Otherwise, 100T takes this with dominance.
Well after losing R1 to ABX they went close to flawless the rest of the tourney and they 3-0 a promising looking C9 Blue (weird to say c9 blue looks promising). They have the drive and they put up a solid performance through the lower bracket. Both teams are solid going into finals with solid rosters and performances. Its a tough choice, but SEN's run from a R1 loss has shown me more drive than 100T which makes me think they are more solid.
Rizvi [#2]This match would actually be useless, both teams would already be qualified and there is actually no seeding required
nt
Styx [#25]Well after losing R1 to ABX they went close to flawless the rest of the tourney and they 3-0 a promising looking C9 Blue (weird to say c9 blue looks promising). They have the drive and they put up a solid performance through the lower bracket. Both teams are solid going into finals with solid rosters and performances. Its a tough choice, but SEN's run from a R1 loss has shown me more drive than 100T which makes me think they are more solid.
close to flawless? they should've lost to T1 but T1 threw 2 maps, and IMT also threw haven. It wasn't flawless, the other teams just threw harder.
Psion [#27]close to flawless? they should've lost to T1 but T1 threw 2 maps, and IMT also threw haven. It wasn't flawless, the other teams just threw harder.
That's why I said close to flawless, they still won the match even with being down. Also, why would these teams want to throw?? They all want to make it to finals/masters. It makes no sense for them to throw.
Styx [#29]That's why I said close to flawless, they still won the match even with being down. Also, why would these teams want to throw?? They all want to make it to finals/masters. It makes no sense for them to throw.
almost losing twice is not close to flawless XD. They didn't purposely throw, they just made all the wrong moves and decisions.
Psion [#30]almost losing twice is not close to flawless XD. They didn't purposely throw, they just made all the wrong moves and decisions.
They almost lost but didnt.... that is why it was close to flawless, they won 2-1 in 2/5 series. That is less than 50% and close to flawless.
PG_newt [#22]what about like... idk, PRIZE MONEY
yeah just like he said no one cares about seeding in terms of placements but seeding in MONEY is heck of a lot
Rizvi [#2]This match would actually be useless, both teams would already be qualified and there is actually no seeding required
this match is just for the prize money, first place gets double the amount of money as second place
Bobstar [#1]SEN vs 100T grand finals (watch SEN are gonna get knocked to the lower brackets again)
Oh no
Bobstar [#1]SEN vs 100T grand finals (watch SEN are gonna get knocked to the lower brackets again)
Who's gonna tell him?
C9 vs NV C9 wins 3-1
I hope c9 does well in iceland. They're on their honeymoon period and it's probably not gonna last till iceland. Hope they figure something out to represent NA well ^^ NV on the other hand should do good. FNS has loads of experience and has represented NA multiple times in international LANs.
greedeetv [#48]What I want... C9 vs V1. What I think... SEN vs C9.
if version 1 qualifies for Iceland Sentinels doesnt...i am gonna be so pissed.
Shush [#47]C9 vs NV C9 wins 3-1
I hope c9 does well in iceland. They're on their honeymoon period and it's probably not gonna last till iceland. Hope they figure something out to represent NA well ^^ NV on the other hand should do good. FNS has loads of experience and has represented NA multiple times in international LANs.
What am I getting down voted for, c9 honeymoon period? Lol
ErenJaeger [#58]SEN vs C9 getting boring
I wanna see Sen vs NV
c9 need to get their revenge at some point tho
HaSanity [#65]Does winning give you seeding or is it just money? So basically this match doesn’t matter?
Winners get seeded in group A (most probably group A gets to ban/pick maps first in semis)
HaSanity [#65]Does winning give you seeding or is it just money? So basically this match doesn’t matter?
-
ranker11 [#66]Winners get seeded in group A (most probably group A gets to ban/pick maps first in semis)
how do u know?
raka_gg [#63]Wooooohoooo
Can't wait to watch 5 maps of teams saving strats and just running around
doubt they still have strats to save. Both teams have given their all during their previous matches. So, it doesn't make sense to not give their all again for an extra 20k, maybe with less pressure for sure.
ihsazal [#70]SEN deserves it more than any team
yeah they deserve to win but who knows who's gonna win this last match
sarahjames [#52]now at this point just imagine these two teams are SEN and C9... and the question is will C9 let SEN get TenZ on loan for LAN?? what you guys think
It is confirmed that tenz will represent sentinels at iceland too
sarahjames [#52]now at this point just imagine these two teams are SEN and C9... and the question is will C9 let SEN get TenZ on loan for LAN?? what you guys think
sen gets tenz till iceland, jack already said that
ac130 [#76]if either of these teams troll to save strats im gonna be so disappointed
Fnatic - TL did troll last bo5 and u expect NA teams will not? Especially a team with dapr? LuL
plas [#77]they will
Actually if u take a look at sen final record, they rarely troll even if it doesn't matter. They try to make a point. Last finals C9 trolled but I doubt vanity would. So maybe we get a decent match not a high quality one but fun : )
Bobstar [#1]SEN vs 100T grand finals (watch SEN are gonna get knocked to the lower brackets again)
should we tell him? or let him find out?
Novaura [#7]The winner of 100t vs Andbox and NV will be making rejavik
yes ....you are 100% correct.. sry xD
plas [#77]they will
SEN wont be in hard focus mode like back when they were down against T1 in challengers 2 trying to qualify or any of the matches before this cause there's not as much on the line, but they definitely wont be trolling
Insyte [#85]SEN wont be in hard focus mode like back when they were down against T1 in challengers 2 trying to qualify or any of the matches before this cause there's not as much on the line, but they definitely wont be trolling
well yeah thats what i meant, obviously not trolling but not trying as hard
viper699mw [#87]I'd not mind if this BO5 is a troll game, not because teams want to save strats or anything. This is a good moment to try some agent combos which you can't in intense games. Personally, I'd like to see some Yorus and some more Vipers.
I agree, but I don't know what planet you've been living on if you still think viper is an agent you can't play in intense games lmao
FordTom [#88]I agree, but I don't know what planet you've been living on if you still think viper is an agent you can't play in intense games lmao
viper is a fucking must in this meta lmfao
viper699mw [#87]I'd not mind if this BO5 is a troll game, not because teams want to save strats or anything. This is a good moment to try some agent combos which you can't in intense games. Personally, I'd like to see some Yorus and some more Vipers.
na has no strat. they just molly somewhere with lineups
Origin [#95]Actually making a prediction -_-
Coming back after all the matches and replying to all the wrong predictions ( ͡ᵔ ‿ ͡ᵔ)
Ikr
raka_gg [#97]if V1 cared they would win this 3-1, since they don't give a fuck SEN wins 3-1
Another bad take from you??
gradualhorizon [#101]I predict that SEN or V1 will win this match, something tells me.
Thank you for your wisdom, oh wise one
VALoka [#4]u get 40k opposed to getting 20k if in second place
Don't they also play for circuit points in this too? If they do then its important for V1 as they started out this event with no pts.
ArgieGR8ArgieB8ArgieM8 [#111]SicK's preaim is out of this world tbh
fr sick in the running for the best player in na
salty [#104]Don't they also play for circuit points in this too? If they do then its important for V1 as they started out this event with no pts.
no their circuit points come from how they place in iceland
kyLeria_ [#116]Did you see penny's peek there when it was real important clutch moment? Spike planted and you peek even before hearing a defuse .. This is the biggest problem of NA.
i think penny just want to caught sicK off guard
alexzoid [#21]I agree with this but not really. SEN will definitely have the motivation to make a comeback after they struggled previously this stage, but I feel like it also makes them a little shaky and more inconsistent. 100T have been steadily consistent and have only shown improvement imo. If we see SEN lock in and fix their struggles, then they could take this tournament. Otherwise, 100T takes this with dominance.
imagine doubting sentinels
cryyBAE [#107]Let's see V1 true potential
would be stupid of them to go all out on a match with no consequences. If they have any brain they would save their true stuff in Iceland, not in a game where it doesnt matter
plas [#114]SEN is just better. simple
Bind is V1's worst map and they had everyone on new agents....
Snev [#123]Bind is V1's worst map and they had everyone on new agents....
okay? SEN is still better in other maps
Snev [#123]Bind is V1's worst map and they had everyone on new agents....
Isn't Bind like Sentinels worst map too? Lmao
STRAWHAT [#127]From being down one map down 3-9 at half in lower bracket of the 2nd closed qualifier against T1 to this........
I mean even if you are a SEN hater you have to be glad that they will represent us in Iceland. Their mental is untouchable.
and in most of their series' on the way to the final they lost a map like 13-1 or 13-0
STRAWHAT [#127]From being down one map down 3-9 at half in lower bracket of the 2nd closed qualifier against T1 to this........
I mean even if you are a SEN hater you have to be glad that they will represent us in Iceland. Their mental is untouchable.
Also if you are a SEN fan, you better be thanking Riot for blessing challengers 2 with double elimination.
STRAWHAT [#127]From being down one map down 3-9 at half in lower bracket of the 2nd closed qualifier against T1 to this........
I mean even if you are a SEN hater you have to be glad that they will represent us in Iceland. Their mental is untouchable.
correct me If i'm wrong but It was T1 not ABX didn't it? they got 1 map lead against ABX but against T1 they down 1 map and lose so bad in split first half
Sogou [#131]correct me If i'm wrong but It was T1 not ABX didn't it? they got 1 map lead against ABX but against T1 they down 1 map and lose so bad in split first half
it was indeed T1 thanks for correction !
Kibitz [#129]another boring finals tf, why it always going 3 0 geez
because SEN just rekts every NA team when it matters. Its really sad that how it is.
ArgieGR8ArgieB8ArgieM8 [#130]Also if you are a SEN fan, you better be thanking Riot for blessing challengers 2 with double elimination.
Its like G2 league of legends with losers bracket, ty riot
ArgieGR8ArgieB8ArgieM8 [#133]I'm watching Shroud's restream and they're talking about AR gaming for bidets where the objective is to clean shit from other people's asses like it's aimlab. Is this normal?
I really like the costreams because people can just chill and say stupid shit, there are the hype costreams and the chill ones
Kibitz [#129]another boring finals tf, why it always going 3 0 geez
Because Sentinels are simply much better than every other NA teams
capita1 [#136]I really like the costreams because people can just chill and say stupid shit, there are the hype costreams and the chill ones
yeah it’s way more entertaining imo
hilo0829 [#139]would not have made it here with sinatraa
atleast we got 1 team that can do well in iceland
no hope for V1 lul
how do you know they wouldnt have? you literally dont know that
SHotgun6969 [#64]I think this should be an easy win for Sentinels but really disappointed to see 100T and C9B knocked out so for now, I am looking forward to Sentinels and Version 1 compete in Reykjavik.
Hot take: C9 Blue will be 10 times better in Stage 3 compared to now. More time to practice with Floppy, get more familiar with Viper, Xeppa also playing in Challengers 1 instead of Poiz. As the team have said multiple times, it's only up from here
turkey [#118]no their circuit points come from how they place in iceland
Yeah, but wherever they place in Iceland, they are guaranteed 150 circuit points at the least, which takes sen to 250. they can easily make it to champions IMO
JCBrute [#144]Yeah, but wherever they place in Iceland, they are guaranteed 150 circuit points at the least, which takes sen to 250. they can easily make it to champions IMO
yeah i think their ticket is already punched to champions i think they’ll do well in stage 3 too
Styx [#31]They almost lost but didnt.... that is why it was close to flawless, they won 2-1 in 2/5 series. That is less than 50% and close to flawless.
you ended up being smarter than me
hilo0829 [#139]would not have made it here with sinatraa
atleast we got 1 team that can do well in iceland
no hope for V1 lul
They were better with sinatraa though...