read the title
Faraday [#2]not wanting to have a partnered team that at any point could get into controversy because their CEO has a history of starting controversy is cancel culture. If companies trying to maximise profit is cancel culture then cancel culture has always existed and always will
still cancel culture like feminist
yamigamidark [#3]still cancel culture like feminist
sure bud, and we all know how feminist of a history riot has had
yamigamidark [#3]still cancel culture like feminist
yes because riot has totally historically been on the side of feminism
yamigamidark [#3]still cancel culture like feminist
awww look at the little guy trying to be controversial
Ppl actually blaming riot for this is brain dead lol. It's literally the only choice the company has especially since it's a their newly partnered franchise league. Why the hell would they want to take a brand risk and controversy org like G2 to sponsors. Like imagine any big sponsor want to get into valorant franchise league and read that g2 ceo is associated with Andrew Tate, rip any chance the franchise has of making money. It also is a new esports franchise, would reflect badly on esports as a whole. It's all about understanding how business works.
Olofboost [#10]Org listens to twitter and reddit users more than to anyone else
What do you expect
It's not that simple lol. Orgs that don't know g2 or Carlos that want to sponsor the valorant franchise league would not want to because of this controversy had g2 made it in. It's all about business, you can't blame riot for doing literally the only right thing in this situation.